Haraldsson B
Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1986;553:1-40.
Studies of the transcapillary exchange of fluid and solutes have provided experimental evidence for the following description of the capillary wall: Transport can be adequately described by passive phenomena such as filtration and diffusion across the permeable structures of the capillary barrier. Hydrophilic solutes are progressively restricted in their transcapillary passage with increasing molecular radius in a bimodal manner. The simplest membrane model compatible with these properties is the two-pore model (Grotte 1956), for which there now is massive documentation (Taylor & Granger 1984). Thus, small hydrophilic solutes (radius less than 30A) are transported mainly by diffusion through small equivalent pores (40-65A), which also represent almost 90% of the hydraulic conductivity. Moreover, larger solutes pass mainly through large equivalent pores (250-350A) by convection. Hence, diffusion is of minor importance for macromolecular transport also during conditions of no net fluid flux across the capillary walls, when there is a circulation of fluid between small and large pores and a net filtration of macromolecules at the large pores. The functional small pores are most probably identical to the interendothelial junctions, while the large pore system is more difficult to define. In addition, solutes are subjected to electrostatic charge interactions at the capillary wall. Thus, there is overwhelming evidence of the presence of high densities of negative charges at the capillary endothelium (glycocalyx), the basement membrane and in the interstitium. This suggests the presence of a negative capillary charge barrier restricting anionic solutes, which also could be experimentally verified (study I & II), but the importance of this barrier is not yet fully clear. A simplistic theoretical two-pore model including effects of charge (Munch et al. 1979) was found to describe our experimental data. According to this model, the charge effect will be most important for solutes with molecular radii of 20-40 A, while charges probably are of no importance for the transport of larger solutes. For anionic macromolecules, e.g. albumin, the effective pore radius will be 40-45A, but the steric small pore radius (i.e. for neutral solutes) will be around 65A. Hereby, the area of diffusion calculated from CFC and the small pore radius (64A) will be lower and it will actually approach the values determined by indicator dilution technique (cf. Haraldsson & Rippe 1986).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
关于液体和溶质跨毛细血管交换的研究,为毛细血管壁的以下描述提供了实验证据:运输过程可以通过诸如过滤和跨毛细血管屏障可渗透结构的扩散等被动现象来充分描述。亲水性溶质在跨毛细血管转运过程中,随着分子半径的增加,以双峰方式逐渐受到限制。与这些特性相符的最简单膜模型是双孔模型(格罗特,1956年),目前已有大量文献记载(泰勒和格兰杰,1984年)。因此,小的亲水性溶质(半径小于30埃)主要通过小等效孔(40 - 65埃)扩散进行运输,这些小等效孔几乎占水力传导率的90%。此外,较大的溶质主要通过大等效孔(250 - 350埃)对流运输。因此,在毛细血管壁无净液体通量的情况下,当小孔和大孔之间存在液体循环且大分子在大孔处有净滤过时,扩散对大分子运输的重要性较小。功能性小孔很可能与内皮细胞间连接相同,而大孔系统则更难定义。此外,溶质在毛细血管壁会受到静电荷相互作用的影响。因此,有大量证据表明在毛细血管内皮(糖萼)、基底膜和间质中存在高密度的负电荷。这表明存在一个限制阴离子溶质的负性毛细血管电荷屏障,这一点也能通过实验验证(研究I和II),但其重要性尚未完全明确。一个包含电荷效应的简化理论双孔模型(蒙克等人,1979年)被发现可以描述我们的实验数据。根据这个模型,电荷效应对于分子半径为20 - 40埃的溶质最为重要,而电荷对较大溶质的运输可能并不重要。对于阴离子大分子,例如白蛋白,有效孔半径将为40 - 45埃,但空间小孔半径(即对于中性溶质而言)将约为65埃。由此,根据氯氟碳法和小孔半径(64埃)计算出的扩散面积会更低,实际上它将接近通过指示剂稀释技术测定的值(参见哈拉尔德松和里佩,1986年)。(摘要截取自400字)