Xie Junqing, Strauss Victoria Y, Martinez-Laguna Daniel, Carbonell-Abella Cristina, Diez-Perez Adolfo, Nogues Xavier, Collins Gary S, Khalid Sara, Delmestri Antonella, Turkiewicz Aleksandra, Englund Martin, Tadrous Mina, Reyes Carlen, Prieto-Alhambra Daniel
Centre for Statistics in Medicine and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFes), Instituto Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
JAMA. 2021 Oct 19;326(15):1504-1515. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.15255.
Although tramadol is increasingly used to manage chronic noncancer pain, few safety studies have compared it with other opioids.
To assess the associations of tramadol, compared with codeine, with mortality and other adverse clinical outcomes as used in outpatient settings.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective, population-based, propensity score-matched cohort study using a primary care database with routinely collected medical records and pharmacy dispensations covering more than 80% of the population of Catalonia, Spain (≈6 million people). Patients 18 years or older with 1 or more year of available data and dispensation of tramadol or codeine (2007-2017) were included and followed up to December 31, 2017.
New prescription dispensation of tramadol or codeine (no dispensation in the previous year).
Outcomes studied were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, fractures, constipation, delirium, falls, opioid abuse/dependence, and sleep disorders within 1 year after the first dispensation. Absolute rate differences (ARDs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using cause-specific Cox models.
Of the 1 093 064 patients with a tramadol or codeine dispensation during the study period (326 921 for tramadol, 762 492 for codeine, 3651 for both drugs concomitantly), a total of 368 960 patients (184 480 propensity score-matched pairs) were included after study exclusions and propensity score matching (mean age, 53.1 [SD, 16.1] years; 57.3% women). Compared with codeine, tramadol dispensation was significantly associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (incidence, 13.00 vs 5.61 per 1000 person-years; HR, 2.31 [95% CI, 2.08-2.56]; ARD, 7.37 [95% CI, 6.09-8.78] per 1000 person-years), cardiovascular events (incidence, 10.03 vs 8.67 per 1000 person-years; HR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.05-1.27]; ARD, 1.36 [95% CI, 0.45-2.36] per 1000 person-years), and fractures (incidence, 12.26 vs 8.13 per 1000 person-years; HR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.37-1.65]; ARD, 4.10 [95% CI, 3.02-5.29] per 1000 person-years). No significant difference was observed for the risk of falls, delirium, constipation, opioid abuse/dependence, or sleep disorders.
In this population-based cohort study, a new prescription dispensation of tramadol, compared with codeine, was significantly associated with a higher risk of subsequent all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, and fractures, but there was no significant difference in the risk of constipation, delirium, falls, opioid abuse/dependence, or sleep disorders. The findings should be interpreted cautiously, given the potential for residual confounding.
尽管曲马多越来越多地用于管理慢性非癌性疼痛,但很少有安全性研究将其与其他阿片类药物进行比较。
评估在门诊环境中使用时,曲马多与可待因相比,与死亡率和其他不良临床结局之间的关联。
设计、设置和参与者:一项回顾性、基于人群的倾向评分匹配队列研究,使用一个初级保健数据库,该数据库包含常规收集的医疗记录和药房配药信息,覆盖西班牙加泰罗尼亚地区超过80%的人口(约600万人)。纳入年龄在18岁及以上、有1年或以上可用数据且有曲马多或可待因配药记录(2007 - 2017年)的患者,并随访至2017年12月31日。
曲马多或可待因的新处方配药(前一年无配药记录)。
研究的结局包括首次配药后1年内的全因死亡率、心血管事件、骨折、便秘、谵妄、跌倒、阿片类药物滥用/依赖和睡眠障碍。使用特定病因的Cox模型计算绝对率差(ARDs)和风险比(HRs)及其95%置信区间。
在研究期间有曲马多或可待因配药记录的1093064名患者中(曲马多326921名,可待因762492名,两种药物同时使用3651名),经过研究排除和倾向评分匹配后,共纳入368960名患者(184480对倾向评分匹配对)(平均年龄53.1[标准差,16.1]岁;57.3%为女性)。与可待因相比,曲马多配药与全因死亡率较高风险显著相关(发病率,每1000人年13.00对5.61;HR,2.31[95%置信区间,2.08 - 2.56];ARD,每1000人年7.37[95%置信区间,6.09 - 8.78])、心血管事件(发病率,每1000人年10.03对8.67;HR,1.15[95%置信区间,1.05 - 1.27];ARD,每1000人年1.36[95%置信区间,0.45 - 2.36])和骨折(发病率,每1000人年12.26对8.13;HR,1.50[95%置信区间,1.37 - 1.65];ARD,每1000人年4.10[95%置信区间,3.02 - 5.29])。在跌倒、谵妄、便秘、阿片类药物滥用/依赖或睡眠障碍风险方面未观察到显著差异。
在这项基于人群的队列研究中,与可待因相比,曲马多的新处方配药与随后全因死亡率、心血管事件和骨折较高风险显著相关,但在便秘、谵妄、跌倒、阿片类药物滥用/依赖或睡眠障碍风险方面无显著差异。鉴于存在残余混杂的可能性,这些发现应谨慎解读。