University of Pennsylvania.
NYU Langone Health.
Am J Bioeth. 2021 Dec;21(12):4-19. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1974975. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
After witnessing extraordinary scientific and regulatory efforts to speed development of and access to new COVID-19 interventions, patients facing other serious diseases have begun to ask "where's our Operation Warp Speed?" and "why isn't Emergency Use Authorization an option for our health crises?" Although this pandemic bears a number of unique features, the response to COVID-19 offers translatable lessons, in both its successes and failures, for non-pandemic diseases. These include the importance of collaborating across sectors, supporting the highest-priority research efforts, adopting rigorous and innovative trial designs, and sharing reliable information quickly. In addition, the regulatory response to the pandemic demonstrates that lowering standards for marketing authorization can result in increased safety concerns, missed opportunities for research and treatment, and delays in determining what works. Accordingly, policymakers and patient advocates seeking to build on the COVID-19 experience for non-pandemic diseases with unmet treatment needs should focus their efforts on promoting robust and efficient research designs, improving access to clinical trials, and facilitating use of the Food and Drug Administration's existing Expanded Access pathway.
在见证了非凡的科学和监管努力以加速开发和获得新的 COVID-19 干预措施之后,面临其他严重疾病的患者开始问道:“我们的‘ warp speed 行动’在哪里?”和“为什么紧急使用授权不是我们卫生危机的选择?”虽然这次大流行具有许多独特的特征,但 COVID-19 的应对措施为非大流行疾病提供了可借鉴的经验教训,包括在跨部门合作、支持优先级最高的研究工作、采用严格和创新的试验设计以及快速分享可靠信息方面。此外,大流行的监管应对措施表明,降低营销授权标准可能会导致更多的安全问题、错失研究和治疗机会,以及延迟确定有效的治疗方法。因此,寻求在有未满足治疗需求的非大流行疾病方面借鉴 COVID-19 经验的政策制定者和患者倡导者,应该集中精力推动强有力和高效的研究设计,改善临床试验的可及性,并促进利用食品和药物管理局现有的扩大准入途径。