Murray Nicholas G, Moran Ryan, Islas Arthur, Pavilionis Phillip, Szekely Brian, Alphonsa Sushma, Howell David, Buckley Thomas, Cipriani Daniel
School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno. 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno NV 89557, P:(775) 682-8347.
Department of Health Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa. 2103 Capital Hall, Box 870325.
J Clin Transl Res. 2021 Jul 16;7(4):443-449. eCollection 2021 Aug 26.
It is currently unknown what specific neuronal deficits influence postural instability following SRC; however, the modulation of postural control relies heavily on the appropriate integration of sensory information from the visual, vestibular, and somatosensory system. It is possible symptom provocation of vestibular or ocular function is related to unsteady gait patterns during tandem gait.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences in temporal and center of pressure (CoP) metrics during discrete events of instrumented tandem gait (iTG) among those with sport-related concussion (SRC) compared to healthy controls. Secondarily, this study attempted to evaluate the relationship between iTG CoP metrics and the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) Exam.
30 collegiate athletes with SRC and 30 healthy controls completed three single task (ST) iTG trials on an instrumented walkway and the VOMS. All individuals with SRC were assessed within 24-48 h post-injury while all controls were measured during pre-participation physicals. CoP metrics in the anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) directions and time to completion were evaluated during the first, turn and second pass of iTG between groups. VOMS score was correlated to the CoP metrics across the discrete events.
Athletes with SRC took longer to complete tandem gait (<0.001) along with the first pass, second pass but not the turn when compared to the control group. SRC had slower velocity in the AP direction during both the first (<0.001) and second pass (<0.001) with increased postural sway in the ML direction during the first pass (=0.014). During the turn, athletes with SRC had postural sway in the ML direction (=0.008). Finally, VOMS score was weakly negatively related to CoP velocity in the AP direction during first (=-0.39) and second (r=-0.36) pass while being weakly positively related to postural sway during the turn (=-0.30).
Athletes with SRC adopted a more conservative walking pattern and the presence of vestibular and/or ocular symptoms influence the ability to perform heel-to-toe walking.
Individuals with SRC will walk slower during heel-to-toe walking and move more in the ML direction with great movement in the ML direction while en pointe turning. This may increase given the total amount of vestibular or vision symptoms following the SRC.
目前尚不清楚哪些特定的神经元缺陷会影响脑震荡后(SRC)的姿势不稳;然而,姿势控制的调节严重依赖于来自视觉、前庭和体感系统的感觉信息的适当整合。前庭或眼功能的症状激发可能与串联步态期间不稳定的步态模式有关。
本研究的目的是评估与健康对照组相比,与运动相关脑震荡(SRC)患者在仪器化串联步态(iTG)离散事件期间的时间和压力中心(CoP)指标的差异。其次,本研究试图评估iTG CoP指标与前庭/眼动筛查(VOMS)检查之间的关系。
30名患有SRC的大学运动员和30名健康对照在仪器化人行道上完成了三项单任务(ST)iTG试验以及VOMS检查。所有患有SRC的个体在受伤后24-48小时内进行评估,而所有对照在赛前体检期间进行测量。在iTG的第一次、转弯和第二次通过期间,评估前后(AP)和内外侧(ML)方向的CoP指标以及完成时间。VOMS评分与离散事件中的CoP指标相关。
与对照组相比,患有SRC的运动员完成串联步态的时间更长(<0.001),包括第一次、第二次通过,但转弯时没有差异。SRC在第一次(<0.001)和第二次通过(<0.001)期间AP方向的速度较慢,在第一次通过期间ML方向的姿势摆动增加(=0.014)。在转弯期间,患有SRC的运动员在ML方向有姿势摆动(=0.008)。最后,VOMS评分在第一次(=-0.39)和第二次(r=-0.36)通过期间与AP方向的CoP速度呈弱负相关,而在转弯期间与姿势摆动呈弱正相关(=-0.30)。
患有SRC的运动员采用了更保守的行走模式,前庭和/或眼部症状的存在会影响脚跟到脚尖行走的能力。
患有SRC的个体在脚跟到脚尖行走时会走得更慢,在ML方向移动更多,在脚尖转弯时在ML方向有更大的移动。考虑到SRC后前庭或视觉症状的总量,这种情况可能会增加。