San Diego Mesa College, San Diego, California, USA.
Child Dev. 2021 Nov;92(6):2595-2602. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13701. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
This study examined the effects of spanking on externalizing on a within-subject level, while excluding causally irrelevant between-subject variance. Results from two longitudinal studies which used participants from the Child Development Project (n = 585) were reanalyzed with a random-intercept cross-lagged panel model using yearly measurements over ages 6-8. After removing between-subject variance, there were no significant effects of general spanking on externalizing (β = .06, .07). However, when done without objects and at a rate of about once per month or less, spanking showed beneficial effects (β = -.17, -.21). Results suggest that previous findings may be due to a failure to separate between-subject and within-subject variance. Additionally, results illustrate the need to examine limited spanking separately from more general forms of physical punishment.
本研究在排除被试间无关的方差的前提下,从个体内水平上考察了打屁股对外化问题的影响。本研究重新分析了两项纵向研究的数据,这些研究使用了儿童发展项目的参与者(n=585),使用了随机截距交叉滞后面板模型,对 6-8 岁时每年的测量数据进行了分析。在排除被试间方差后,一般打屁股对外化问题没有显著影响(β=0.06,0.07)。然而,当打屁股不用物体、每月一次或更少时,打屁股显示出有益的效果(β=−0.17,−0.21)。结果表明,先前的发现可能是由于未能区分被试间和被试内方差。此外,结果表明有必要分别考察有限的打屁股与更普遍的体罚形式。