• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对残疾学生的机构问责制:呼吁医学教育联络委员会采取行动。

Institutional Accountability for Students With Disabilities: A Call for Liaison Committee on Medical Education Action.

作者信息

Meeks Lisa M, Stergiopoulos Erene, Petersen Kristina H

机构信息

L.M. Meeks is adjunct assistant professor of family medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, researcher, Center for a Diverse Healthcare Workforce, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, and associate professor of psychiatry, University of Colorado Medical School, Aurora, Colorado; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3647-3657 .

E. Stergiopoulos is a third-year resident, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8039-872X .

出版信息

Acad Med. 2022 Mar 1;97(3):341-345. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004471.

DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000004471
PMID:34670236
Abstract

Medical educators and leaders have called for greater diversity among the physician workforce, including those with disabilities. However, many students with disabilities are precluded from entering and completing medical training due to historically restrictive technical standards and poor internal practices to protect student privacy. This limits the possibilities for growing this part of the workforce and making progress toward the ultimate goal of having a physician workforce that better represents the patients it serves. To achieve diversity among the physician workforce, medical education must create environments that allow students with disabilities to apply to, flourish in, and feel well supported in medical school. Recent additions to Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements have helped to catalyze work in the area of disability inclusion by incorporating disability-focused mandates into graduate medical education accreditation standards. However, similar mandates for undergraduate medical education have not yet materialized. In this article, the authors call for the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) to elevate disability as a valued part of medical school diversity in its accreditation standards and to include protections for disabled students. The authors propose that the LCME can take 5 actions to promote institutional accountability toward students with disabilities: (1) define disability as diversity, (2) mandate disability support, (3) protect from conflicts of interest, (4) protect privacy, and (5) verify schools' technical standards comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. By adopting these recommendations, the LCME would send the powerful message that students with disabilities bring welcome expertise and value to the medical community.

摘要

医学教育工作者和领导者呼吁医生队伍实现更大的多样性,包括接纳残疾人士。然而,由于历史上严格的技术标准以及保护学生隐私方面的内部做法不佳,许多残疾学生被排除在医学培训之外,无法入学并完成学业。这限制了扩大这部分劳动力队伍的可能性,也阻碍了朝着建立一支能更好地代表其所服务患者的医生队伍这一最终目标迈进。为了实现医生队伍的多样性,医学教育必须营造环境,让残疾学生能够申请医学院、在医学院蓬勃发展并获得有力支持。研究生医学教育认证委员会(Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education)要求的最新补充内容,通过将以残疾为重点的规定纳入研究生医学教育认证标准,有助于推动在残疾包容领域的工作。然而,本科医学教育的类似规定尚未实现。在本文中,作者呼吁医学教育联络委员会(Liaison Committee on Medical Education,LCME)在其认证标准中将残疾提升为医学院多样性的重要组成部分,并纳入对残疾学生的保护措施。作者建议LCME可以采取五项行动来促进机构对残疾学生的问责:(1)将残疾定义为多样性;(2)强制提供残疾支持;(3)防止利益冲突;(4)保护隐私;(5)核实学校的技术标准符合《美国残疾人法案》。通过采纳这些建议,LCME将发出一个强有力的信息,即残疾学生为医学界带来了受欢迎的专业知识和价值。

相似文献

1
Institutional Accountability for Students With Disabilities: A Call for Liaison Committee on Medical Education Action.对残疾学生的机构问责制:呼吁医学教育联络委员会采取行动。
Acad Med. 2022 Mar 1;97(3):341-345. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004471.
2
Encouraging workforce diversity- supporting medical students with mobility and sensory disabilities.鼓励员工多样化——为有行动和感官障碍的医学生提供支持。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 May;46(9):1916-1920. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2201511. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
3
Bringing Needed Change to Medical Student Well-Being: A Call to Expand Accreditation Requirements.为医学生的幸福带来必要的改变:呼吁扩大认证要求。
Teach Learn Med. 2023 Jan-Mar;35(1):101-107. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2021.2020121. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
4
What Is the Role of Accreditation in Achieving Medical School Diversity?认证在实现医学院多元化方面发挥着什么作用?
AMA J Ethics. 2021 Dec 1;23(12):E946-952. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.946.
5
Technical Standards and Deaf and Hard of Hearing Medical School Applicants and Students: Interrogating Sensory Capacity and Practice Capacity.技术标准与失聪及听力障碍医学院申请者和学生:审视感官能力与实践能力
AMA J Ethics. 2016 Oct 1;18(10):1050-1059. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.10.sect1-1610.
6
Medical Schools' Willingness to Accommodate Medical Students with Sensory and Physical Disabilities: Ethical Foundations of a Functional Challenge to "Organic" Technical Standards.医学院校接纳有感官和身体残疾的医学生的意愿:对“器质性”技术标准功能挑战的伦理基础
AMA J Ethics. 2016 Oct 1;18(10):993-1002. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.10.medu1-1610.
7
Call to Action: Eliminate Barriers Faced by Medical Students With Disabilities.行动呼吁:消除残疾医学生面临的障碍。
Ann Fam Med. 2022 Jul-Aug;20(4):376-378. doi: 10.1370/afm.2824.
8
Impact of the Liaison Committee on Medical Education requirements for emergency medicine education at U.S. schools of medicine.联络委员会对美国医学院校急诊医学教育要求的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Oct;12(10):1003-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.05.029.
9
North American medical schools' experience with and approaches to the needs of students with physical and sensory disabilities.北美医学院在身体和感官残疾学生需求方面的经验和方法。
Acad Med. 2012 May;87(5):567-73. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31824dd129.
10
The meaning and application of medical accreditation standards.医学认证标准的意义与应用。
Acad Med. 1997 Sep;72(9):808-18. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199709000-00019.

引用本文的文献

1
"The Forgotten Minority": Perpetuation of Ableism in Medical Education.“被遗忘的少数群体”:医学教育中对残障歧视的延续
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May;40(6):1378-1386. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09308-2. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
2
Effects of Department Type and Disability Status on Medical School Faculty Wellbeing.科室类型和残疾状况对医学院教师幸福感的影响。
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 9;8(1):e70317. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70317. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Disability competency training in medical education.医学教育中的残疾能力培训。
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2207773. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2207773.
4
Impact of USMLE Step-1 accommodation denial on US medical schools: A national survey.美国医师执照考试第一步拒考对美国医学院的影响:全国性调查。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 14;17(4):e0266685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266685. eCollection 2022.
5
Dismantle Ableism, Accept Disability: Making the Case for Anti-Ableism in Medical Education.消除对残障者的歧视,接纳残障:论证医学教育中反残障歧视的必要性。
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2022 Feb 2;9:23821205221076660. doi: 10.1177/23821205221076660. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
6
Technical Standards from Newly Established Medical Schools: A Review of Disability Inclusive Practices.新建医学院校的技术标准:对包容性残疾实践的综述
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2022 Jan 10;9:23821205211072763. doi: 10.1177/23821205211072763. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.