Suppr超能文献

烧伤患者的远程医疗:可靠性和患者偏好。

Telemedicine in burn patients: reliability and patient preference.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Burn Center, Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey.

Department of General Surgery, Burn Center, Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey.

出版信息

Burns. 2021 Dec;47(8):1873-1877. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.11.015. Epub 2020 Dec 3.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Burn care is demanding and time intensive. After initial evaluation and treatment, remote follow-up of suitable patients might reduce the on-site workload and efficiency. In this study, the reliability of telemedicine assessment of burn patients and preference of patients to use telemedicine was investigated.

METHODS

The study was designed as cross-sectional, and included 100 acute burn patients admitted to our burn service between 1 December 2018 and 31 May 2019. Informed consent was obtained from the patients for imaging of the burn wound. Burn wounds were evaluated in the outpatient clinic by an experienced burn specialist, and lesion images that were sent using WhatsApp were evaluated by another. Patients were offered telemedicine follow-up using WhatsApp communication without being present. The data of assessments, demographic and epidemiological data, and reasons for preference of follow-up via telemedicine were examined.

RESULTS

The mean age of our patients was 21.21 ± 21.7 years. The percentage of burned total body surface area was 3.66 ± 3.4 on examination and 3.44 ± 3.2 on WhatsApp and the level of concordance was very high (ICC = 0.993). The inter-rater reliability values for the face-to-face examination and telemedicine groups in terms of "burn depth" and "decision of hospitalization" was congruent. Of the patients, 61% did not choose follow up with telemedicine. Demand of face-to-face assessment by burn expert was the most common reason (60.7%). In 26 patients who chose to be followed up with telemedicine, the most common reason was "living distance from the burn center" (92.3%). The remaining 13 patients indicated they did not have a preference.

CONCLUSIONS

In the assessment of burn wounds, telemedicine and face-to-face examination resulted in agreement in terms of burn depth, decision of hospitalization and percentage of total body surface area. Although WhatsApp is a reliable method, the majority of patients preferred a face-to-face follow-up. WhatsApp application can be used in remote follow up of eligible burn patients after giving brief information about the procedure.

摘要

简介

烧伤治疗既要求高又耗费时间。在完成初始评估和治疗后,对合适的患者进行远程随访可能会减少现场工作量和提高效率。本研究旨在调查远程医疗评估烧伤患者的可靠性以及患者对远程医疗的偏好。

方法

本研究为横断面研究,纳入了 2018 年 12 月 1 日至 2019 年 5 月 31 日期间在我院烧伤科就诊的 100 例急性烧伤患者。对患者进行了知情同意,以便对烧伤创面进行成像。由一名经验丰富的烧伤专家在门诊对烧伤创面进行评估,并由另一名专家通过 WhatsApp 评估发送的病变图像。为患者提供了通过 WhatsApp 通信进行远程医疗随访的选择,但患者无需到场。检查了评估数据、人口统计学和流行病学数据以及通过远程医疗进行随访的偏好原因。

结果

患者的平均年龄为 21.21 ± 21.7 岁。检查时的烧伤总面积百分比为 3.66 ± 3.4%,通过 WhatsApp 为 3.44 ± 3.2%,一致性非常高(ICC = 0.993)。面对面检查和远程医疗组在“烧伤深度”和“住院决策”方面的组内相关系数值一致。在 61%的患者中,不选择通过远程医疗进行随访。要求烧伤专家进行面对面评估是最常见的原因(60.7%)。在选择通过远程医疗进行随访的 26 例患者中,最常见的原因是“距离烧伤中心的距离”(92.3%)。其余 13 名患者表示没有偏好。

结论

在烧伤创面评估中,远程医疗和面对面检查在烧伤深度、住院决策和全身表面积百分比方面结果一致。尽管 WhatsApp 是一种可靠的方法,但大多数患者更喜欢面对面随访。在向患者简要介绍程序后,可将 WhatsApp 应用于合格烧伤患者的远程随访。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验