• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分叉冠状动脉支架置入术的原理、设计及意义:来自印度分叉支架置入术(IBIS)注册研究的见解

Rationale, Design, and Implications of Bifurcation Coronary Stenting: Insight from the Indian Bifurcation Stenting (IBIS) Registry.

作者信息

A Jabir, Malviya Amit, Thomas Joby, S Vijaykumar, Mandalay Ashishkumar, Joseph Jo, Mathew Rony

机构信息

Cardiology, Lisie Hospital, Kochi, IND.

Cardiology, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health And Medical Sciences, Shillong, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2021 Sep 16;13(9):e18027. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18027. eCollection 2021 Sep.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.18027
PMID:34671518
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8520440/
Abstract

Background Bifurcation coronary stenting (BCS) has unique therapeutic challenges. Several BCS strategies are prescribed for treatment, with conflicting data, and which is the best strategy for optimal short- and long-term outcomes remains a matter of debate. There is no systematic data from an Indian perspective in regard to patterns of BCS and its outcomes. Methods and analysis The Indian Bifurcation Stenting (IBIS) registry is a prospective, nationwide, endpoint-driven, investigator-initiated, multi-center, observational registry to compare the different bifurcation stent strategies, the effect of adjuvant techniques, and bifurcation anatomical differences in predicting short- and long-term clinical outcomes of bifurcation coronary interventions in India. A total of 1,000 patients from 20 clinical sites across the country will be enrolled in this study from September 2020 to August 2023. The primary endpoint will be the composite endpoint of major adverse cardiac events including cardiac death, target lesion myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization at the end of two years. The secondary endpoints include all causes of death, MI, target vessel revascularization, in-stent restenosis, stroke, and predefined procedural parameters. The safety endpoint is the occurrence of definite or probable stent thrombosis. Conclusion The aim of this prospective observational registry is to assess the practice patterns and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing coronary bifurcation lesion angioplasty in India. This will be extremely useful to provide an evidence-based insight as well as guidance to bifurcation angioplasty in India.

摘要

背景 冠状动脉分叉病变支架置入术(BCS)具有独特的治疗挑战。目前针对该疾病规定了几种治疗策略,但相关数据存在冲突,哪种策略能实现最佳的短期和长期疗效仍是一个有争议的问题。从印度的角度来看,目前尚无关于BCS模式及其结果的系统性数据。

方法与分析 印度分叉病变支架置入术(IBIS)注册研究是一项前瞻性、全国性、终点驱动、研究者发起的多中心观察性注册研究,旨在比较不同的分叉病变支架策略、辅助技术的效果以及分叉病变解剖结构差异对印度冠状动脉分叉病变介入治疗短期和长期临床结果的预测作用。2020年9月至2023年8月期间,将从全国20个临床地点招募1000名患者参与本研究。主要终点为两年末包括心源性死亡、靶病变心肌梗死(MI)和缺血驱动的靶病变血运重建在内的主要不良心脏事件复合终点。次要终点包括各种原因导致的死亡、MI、靶血管血运重建、支架内再狭窄、中风以及预设的手术参数。安全终点为明确或可能的支架血栓形成事件。

结论 这项前瞻性观察性注册研究的目的是评估印度接受冠状动脉分叉病变血管成形术患者的治疗模式和临床结果。这对于为印度的分叉病变血管成形术提供基于证据的见解和指导将极为有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceea/8520440/6f2c0844f33e/cureus-0013-00000018027-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceea/8520440/6f2c0844f33e/cureus-0013-00000018027-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceea/8520440/6f2c0844f33e/cureus-0013-00000018027-i01.jpg

相似文献

1
Rationale, Design, and Implications of Bifurcation Coronary Stenting: Insight from the Indian Bifurcation Stenting (IBIS) Registry.分叉冠状动脉支架置入术的原理、设计及意义:来自印度分叉支架置入术(IBIS)注册研究的见解
Cureus. 2021 Sep 16;13(9):e18027. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18027. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
Modified double-stent strategy may be an optimal choice for coronary bifurcation lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.改良双支架策略可能是冠状动脉分叉病变的最佳选择:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(48):e13377. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013377.
3
Treatment effects of systematic two-stent and provisional stenting techniques in patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions: rationale and design of a prospective, randomised and multicentre DEFINITION II trial.系统双支架和临时支架技术治疗复杂冠状动脉分叉病变患者的疗效:一项前瞻性、随机、多中心DEFINITION II试验的原理与设计
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 6;8(3):e020019. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020019.
4
Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting for Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions: DKCRUSH-V Randomized Trial.双对吻挤压术与预扩张支架术治疗左主干远端分叉病变的随机对照研究(DKCRUSH-V 研究)
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Nov 28;70(21):2605-2617. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1066. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
5
Twelve-month clinical outcomes of "nano-crush technique" for the treatment of bifurcation lesions using ultra-thin (60 µm) sirolimus-eluting coronary stents.使用超薄(60微米)西罗莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架的“纳米挤压技术”治疗分叉病变的12个月临床结果。
Minerva Cardiol Angiol. 2023 Feb;71(1):51-60. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5683.21.05875-0. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
6
Cardiovascular outcomes associated with crush versus provisional stenting techniques for bifurcation lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.分叉病变中挤压与临时支架技术相关的心血管结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Apr 23;19(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1070-y.
7
Clinical Outcomes Following Coronary Bifurcation PCI Techniques: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Comprising 5,711 Patients.冠状动脉分叉病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗技术的临床结局:包含 5711 例患者的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 22;13(12):1432-1444. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.054.
8
Randomized Comparison of FFR-Guided and Angiography-Guided Provisional Stenting of True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: The DKCRUSH-VI Trial (Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions VI).随机比较血流储备分数指导下和血管造影指导下的真性冠状动脉分叉病变的临时支架置入术:DKCRUSH-VI 试验(双对吻挤压术与分叉病变治疗中临时支架置入术的 VI 代技术)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr 20;8(4):536-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.12.221. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
9
Stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis demonstrates superiority of double-kissing crush in complex lesions.冠状动脉分叉病变的支架置入技术:系统评价和网络荟萃分析显示,在复杂病变中,双对吻挤压术优于其他技术。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2022 Jul;111(7):761-775. doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01979-9. Epub 2021 Dec 4.
10
Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions).冠状动脉分叉病变双吻挤压术与临时支架置入术的临床结局:多中心随机DKCRUSH-II研究(冠状动脉分叉病变双吻挤压技术与临时支架置入技术的随机研究)的5年随访结果
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb;10(2):e004497. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004497.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of 2-Stenting Strategies Depending on Sequence or Technique for Bifurcation Lesions in the Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Era - Analysis From the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) III Registry.第二代药物洗脱支架时代分叉病变 2 种支架策略(根据序贯或技术)的比较——来自 COBIS(冠状动脉分叉病变支架)III 注册研究的分析。
Circ J. 2021 Oct 25;85(11):1944-1955. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0999. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
2
National interventional council data for the year 2018-India.2018 年印度国家介入理事会数据。
Indian Heart J. 2020 Sep-Oct;72(5):351-355. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.07.018. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
3
Provisional stenting or not provisional stenting: seven critical points for bifurcations treatment with a glimpse on left main bifurcation stenting.
预扩张支架置入或不预扩张支架置入:分叉病变处理的七个关键点——左主干分叉病变支架置入一瞥
Minerva Cardiol Angiol. 2021 Jun;69(3):322-330. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5683.20.05294-9. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
4
Clinical Outcomes Following Coronary Bifurcation PCI Techniques: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Comprising 5,711 Patients.冠状动脉分叉病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗技术的临床结局:包含 5711 例患者的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 22;13(12):1432-1444. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.054.
5
3-Year Outcomes of the DKCRUSH-V Trial Comparing DK Crush With Provisional Stenting for Left Main Bifurcation Lesions.比较DK Crush与临时支架置入术治疗左主干分叉病变的DKCRUSH-V试验的3年结果
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct 14;12(19):1927-1937. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.056. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
6
One Versus 2-stent Strategy for the Treatment of Bifurcation Lesions in the Context of a Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion. A Multicenter Registry.
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2018 Jun;71(6):432-439. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
7
Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting for Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions: DKCRUSH-V Randomized Trial.双对吻挤压术与预扩张支架术治疗左主干远端分叉病变的随机对照研究(DKCRUSH-V 研究)
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Nov 28;70(21):2605-2617. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1066. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
8
Long-Term Outcomes After Stent Implantation for Left Main Coronary Artery (from the Multicenter Assessing Optimal Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Artery Stenting Registry).左主干冠状动脉支架植入后的长期预后(来自多中心评估左主干冠状动脉支架置入术最佳经皮冠状动脉介入治疗注册研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Feb 1;119(3):355-364. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.10.033. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
9
Comparison Between 1- and 2-Stent Strategies in Unprotected Distal Left Main Disease: The Milan and New-Tokyo Registry.无保护左主干远端病变单支架与双支架策略的比较:米兰和新东京注册研究
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov;9(11). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.003359.
10
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Bifurcation: How Can We Outperform the Provisional Strategy?经皮冠状动脉介入治疗分叉病变:我们如何超越临时策略?
Clin Cardiol. 2016 Nov;39(11):684-691. doi: 10.1002/clc.22581. Epub 2016 Aug 24.