Institute for Frontier Areas of Psychology and Mental Health, Freiburg, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 21;16(10):e0258667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258667. eCollection 2021.
Current theories about visual perception assume that our perceptual system weights the a priori incomplete, noisy and ambiguous sensory information with previous, memorized perceptual experiences in order to construct stable and reliable percepts. These theories are supported by numerous experimental findings. Theories about precognition have an opposite point of view. They assume that information from the future can have influence on perception, thoughts, and behavior. Several experimental studies provide evidence for precognition effects, other studies found no such effects. One problem may be that the vast majority of precognition paradigms did not systematically control for potential effects from the perceptual history. In the present study, we presented ambiguous Necker cube stimuli and disambiguated cube variants and systematically tested in two separate experiments whether perception of a currently observed ambiguous Necker cube stimulus can be influenced by a disambiguated cube variant, presented in the immediate perceptual past (perceptual history effects) and/or in the immediate perceptual future (precognition effects). We found perceptual history effects, which partly depended on the length of the perceptual history trace but were independent of the perceptual future. Results from some individual participants suggest on the first glance a precognition pattern, but results from our second experiment make a perceptual history explanation more probable. On the group level, no precognition effects were statistically indicated. The perceptual history effects found in the present study are in confirmation with related studies from the literature. The precognition analysis revealed some interesting individual patterns, which however did not allow for general conclusions. Overall, the present study demonstrates that any future experiment about sensory or extrasensory perception urgently needs to control for potential perceptual history effects and that temporal aspects of stimulus presentation are of high relevance.
当前关于视觉感知的理论假设,我们的感知系统会权衡先前记忆中的感知经验与先前记忆中的感知经验,以构建稳定可靠的感知。这些理论得到了大量实验结果的支持。预知理论则持相反的观点。它们假设来自未来的信息可以对感知、思想和行为产生影响。一些实验研究提供了预知效应的证据,而其他研究则没有发现这种效应。一个问题可能是,绝大多数预知范式没有系统地控制来自感知历史的潜在影响。在本研究中,我们呈现了模糊的内克尔立方体刺激和去模糊的立方体变体,并在两个独立的实验中系统地测试了当前观察到的模糊内克尔立方体刺激的感知是否可以受到即时感知过去(感知历史效应)和/或即时感知未来(预知效应)中呈现的去模糊的立方体变体的影响。我们发现了感知历史效应,它部分取决于感知历史痕迹的长度,但与感知未来无关。一些个体参与者的结果乍一看表明存在预知模式,但我们第二个实验的结果更倾向于感知历史解释。从群体水平来看,没有统计上的预知效应。本研究中发现的感知历史效应与文献中的相关研究一致。预知分析揭示了一些有趣的个体模式,但不允许得出一般性结论。总体而言,本研究表明,任何关于感官或超感官感知的未来实验都迫切需要控制潜在的感知历史效应,并且刺激呈现的时间方面具有重要意义。