• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较护士主导与医生主导的糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)治疗方案的疗效。

Comparing the Efficacy of a Nurse-Driven and a Physician-Driven Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA) Treatment Protocol.

作者信息

Anis Takla R, Boudreau Marybeth, Thornton Tyson

机构信息

Pharmacy Department, Northern Light Eastern Maine Medical Center, Bangor, ME, USA.

Pharmacy Department, Northern Light Sebasticook Valley Hospital, Pittsfield, ME, USA.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Oct 7;13:197-202. doi: 10.2147/CPAA.S334119. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.2147/CPAA.S334119
PMID:34675693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8504870/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Standardized DKA treatment could result in better overall safety and efficacy outcomes. The primary objective of this study is to validate the efficacy of an adapted nurse-driven DKA protocol compared to a physician-driven DKA protocol across the continuum of three hospital settings: the University of Colorado upon which the physician-driven protocol is based, Northern Light Eastern Maine Medical Center (NLEMMC), and Northern Light Sebasticook Valley Hospital (NLSVH). The secondary objective is to assess the safety of the adapted nurse-driven DKA protocol adapted at NLEMMC and NLSVH through determining the incidence of hypoglycemia and anion gap reopening.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, IRB-approved, multi-center study that included: patients 18 years or older who were treated with the DKA protocol at NLEMMC or NLSVH, and admitted to the emergency department between July 2015 and October 2020 with a primary diagnosis of DKA and an elevated anion gap greater than or equal to 13 mEq/L.

RESULTS

A total of 90 patients from NLEMMC and 64 patients from NLSVH were included and compared to 111 patients from the University of Colorado who were included in the post protocol implementation group. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome, time to anion gap closure, between the original University of Colorado study (10.3 hours) and the NLEMMC (10.9 hours, = 0.420) and NLSVH (8.8 hours, = 0.115) results presented in this study.

CONCLUSION

The standardized nurse-driven DKA treatment protocol at NLEMMC and NLSVH showed no statistical difference in time to anion gap closure compared to the University of Colorado study upon which it was based. This finding is particularly relevant to hospitals such as NLEMMC and NLSVH that lack provider resources and teams of endocrinologists required for the physician-driven DKA protocol.

摘要

背景

标准化的糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)治疗可带来更好的总体安全性和疗效结果。本研究的主要目的是在三个医院环境的连续过程中,验证与医生主导的DKA方案相比,调整后的护士主导的DKA方案的疗效:医生主导方案所基于的科罗拉多大学、缅因州东部医疗中心(NLEMMC)和塞巴斯蒂库克谷医院(NLSVH)。次要目的是通过确定低血糖发生率和阴离子间隙重新打开的情况,评估在NLEMMC和NLSVH调整后的护士主导的DKA方案的安全性。

患者和方法

这是一项经机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的回顾性多中心研究,包括:18岁及以上在NLEMMC或NLSVH接受DKA方案治疗的患者,于2015年7月至2020年10月间因初步诊断为DKA且阴离子间隙升高大于或等于13 mEq/L而入住急诊科。

结果

共纳入了来自NLEMMC的90例患者和来自NLSVH的64例患者,并与科罗拉多大学纳入方案实施后组的111例患者进行比较。本研究中,原始的科罗拉多大学研究(10.3小时)与NLEMMC(10.9小时,P = 0.420)和NLSVH(8.8小时,P = 0.115)结果之间,主要结局即阴离子间隙闭合时间无统计学显著差异。

结论

与所基于的科罗拉多大学研究相比,NLEMMC和NLSVH的标准化护士主导的DKA治疗方案在阴离子间隙闭合时间上无统计学差异。这一发现对于像NLEMMC和NLSVH这样缺乏医生主导的DKA方案所需的医疗资源和内分泌专家团队的医院尤为重要。

相似文献

1
Comparing the Efficacy of a Nurse-Driven and a Physician-Driven Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA) Treatment Protocol.比较护士主导与医生主导的糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)治疗方案的疗效。
Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Oct 7;13:197-202. doi: 10.2147/CPAA.S334119. eCollection 2021.
2
Impact on Diabetic Ketoacidosis Resolution After Implementation of a 2-Bag Fluid Order Set.实施两袋液体医嘱集对糖尿病酮症酸中毒缓解的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2023 Dec;57(12):1361-1366. doi: 10.1177/10600280231163838. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
3
Development and Implementation of a Diabetic Ketoacidosis Protocol for Adults With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes at a Tertiary Care Multicampus Hospital.成人 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病酮症酸中毒方案的制定与实施:一家三级多院区医院的经验
Can J Diabetes. 2019 Jun;43(4):256-260.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2018.08.192. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
4
Safety of an Initial Insulin Bolus in the Treatment of Diabetic Ketoacidosis.初始胰岛素推注治疗糖尿病酮症酸中毒的安全性。
J Pharm Pract. 2024 Jun;37(3):690-695. doi: 10.1177/08971900231175705. Epub 2023 May 10.
5
Success of Insulin Infusion Transitions in Moderate to Severe Diabetic Ketoacidosis With Transition Anion Gap of Less Than or Equal to 12 mEq/L Versus Greater Than 12 mEq/L.胰岛素输注转换在中度至重度糖尿病酮症酸中毒中的成功率:转换时阴离子间隙小于或等于12 mEq/L与大于12 mEq/L的比较
Hosp Pharm. 2024 Jun;59(3):334-340. doi: 10.1177/00185787231218935. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
6
Clinical Effects of Balanced Crystalloids vs Saline in Adults With Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A Subgroup Analysis of Cluster Randomized Clinical Trials.糖尿病酮症酸中毒成人中平衡晶体液与生理盐水的临床效果:集群随机临床试验的亚组分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2024596. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24596.
7
Reducing Diabetic Ketoacidosis Intensive Care Unit Admissions Through an Electronic Health Record-Driven, Standardized Care Pathway.通过电子健康记录驱动的标准化护理路径降低糖尿病酮症酸中毒重症监护病房入院率。
J Healthc Qual. 2020 Sep/Oct;42(5):e66-e74. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000247.
8
Analysis of the 2-Bag Method for the Management of Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A Retrospective before and after Study.糖尿病酮症酸中毒管理的双袋法分析:一项前后回顾性研究。
J Pharm Pract. 2025 Feb;38(1):21-27. doi: 10.1177/08971900241262383. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
9
Comparison of a 'two-bag system' versus conventional treatment protocol ('one-bag system') in the management of diabetic ketoacidosis.“双袋系统”与传统治疗方案(“单袋系统”)在糖尿病酮症酸中毒管理中的比较。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017 Aug 11;5(1):e000395. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000395. eCollection 2017.
10
Impact of a Nurse-Driven Diabetic Ketoacidosis Insulin Infusion Calculator on the Rate of Hypoglycemia.护士驱动的糖尿病酮症酸中毒胰岛素输注计算器对低血糖发生率的影响。
J Patient Saf. 2020 Dec;16(4):e255-e259. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000647.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a Protocol for Management of Euglycemic Diabetic Ketoacidosis.制定正常血糖性糖尿病酮症酸中毒的管理方案。
Curr Diab Rep. 2025 Sep 3;25(1):48. doi: 10.1007/s11892-025-01604-3.
2
Nurse-led insulin protocol efficacy for control of hyperglycemia in critically Ill patients.护士主导的胰岛素方案对危重症患者高血糖控制的疗效
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 15;24(1):924. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03553-4.
3
Heterogeneity in the management of diabetic ketoacidosis in Australia: a national survey.澳大利亚糖尿病酮症酸中毒管理的异质性:一项全国性调查。
Intern Med J. 2025 May;55(5):728-733. doi: 10.1111/imj.70024. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
4
16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.16. 医院中的糖尿病护理:2025年糖尿病护理标准
Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan 1;48(Supplement_1):S321-S334. doi: 10.2337/dc25-S016.
5
Hyperglycemic Crises in Adults With Diabetes: A Consensus Report.成人糖尿病高血糖危象:共识报告。
Diabetes Care. 2024 Aug 1;47(8):1257-1275. doi: 10.2337/dci24-0032.
6
Hyperglycaemic crises in adults with diabetes: a consensus report.成人糖尿病高血糖危象:共识报告。
Diabetologia. 2024 Aug;67(8):1455-1479. doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06183-8. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
7
16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.16. 医院中的糖尿病护理:2024 年糖尿病护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(Suppl 1):S295-S306. doi: 10.2337/dc24-S016.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of COVID-19 on the clinical course of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.新型冠状病毒肺炎对1型和2型糖尿病患者糖尿病酮症酸中毒临床病程的影响。
Endocr Connect. 2021 Apr;10(4):371-377. doi: 10.1530/EC-20-0567.
2
Initial management of diabetic ketoacidosis and prognosis according to diabetes type: a French multicentre observational retrospective study.根据糖尿病类型对糖尿病酮症酸中毒的初始管理及预后:一项法国多中心观察性回顾性研究
Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Aug 15;9(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0567-y.
3
ADDRESSING PITFALLS IN MANAGEMENT OF DIABETIC KETOACIDOSIS WITH A STANDARDIZED PROTOCOL.采用标准化方案处理糖尿病酮症酸中毒管理中的难点。
Endocr Pract. 2019 May;25(5):407-412. doi: 10.4158/EP-2018-0398. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
4
Guidelines and controversies in the management of diabetic ketoacidosis - A mini-review.糖尿病酮症酸中毒管理中的指南与争议——一篇综述
World J Diabetes. 2018 Dec 15;9(12):226-229. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v9.i12.226.
5
Hyperglycemic crises in adult patients with diabetes.成年糖尿病患者的高血糖危象
Diabetes Care. 2009 Jul;32(7):1335-43. doi: 10.2337/dc09-9032.
6
Treatment practices of diabetic ketoacidosis at a large teaching hospital.一家大型教学医院的糖尿病酮症酸中毒治疗实践
J Nurs Care Qual. 2008 Apr-Jun;23(2):147-54. doi: 10.1097/01.NCQ.0000313764.64149.6d.
7
Burden of hospitalizations primarily due to uncontrolled diabetes: implications of inadequate primary health care in the United States.主要由未控制的糖尿病导致的住院负担:美国初级卫生保健不足的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2007 May;30(5):1281-2. doi: 10.2337/dc06-2070. Epub 2007 Feb 8.
8
Mandatory protocol for treating adult patients with diabetic ketoacidosis decreases intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay: results of a nonrandomized trial.治疗成年糖尿病酮症酸中毒患者的强制性方案可缩短重症监护病房住院时间和医院住院总时长:一项非随机试验的结果
Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):41-6. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000249825.18677.D2.
9
American College of Endocrinology and American Diabetes Association Consensus statement on inpatient diabetes and glycemic control.美国内分泌学会和美国糖尿病协会关于住院患者糖尿病及血糖控制的共识声明。
Diabetes Care. 2006 Aug;29(8):1955-62. doi: 10.2337/dc06-9913.