Senior Fellow, BIDMC Disaster Medicine Fellowship; Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MassachusettsUSA.
Assistant Professor of Criminology, Department of Behavioral Sciences, Flagler College, Saint Augustine, FloridaUSA.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2021 Dec;36(6):664-668. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X21001151. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
While suicide bombings in the context of warfare have existed throughout history, there was an exponential rise in such attacks in the decade following the initiation of the War on Terror. The health care implications of such attacks are a growing concern across the emergency response sector, and this study is an epidemiological examination of all terrorism-related bombings sustained from 1970-2019, comparing the rates of fatal injuries (FI) and non-fatal injuries (NFI) between suicide bombing attacks (SBA) versus non-suicide bombing attacks (NSBA).
Data collection was performed using a retrospective database search through the Global Terrorism Database (GTD). The GTD database was downloaded and searched using the internal database search functions for all events that occurred from January 1, 1970 - December 31, 2019. Bombing/explosion as a primary "attack type" and explosives as a primary "weapon type" were selected for the purpose of this study, and events were further sub-classified as either "suicide attack" or "non-suicide attack." Results were exported into an Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft Corp.; Redmond, Washington USA) for analysis.
There were 82,217 bombing/explosion terrorist attacks using explosives documented during the study period with 135,807 fatalities and 352,500 NFI.A total of 5,416 events (6.59% of all events) were sub-classified as SBA causing 52,317 FI (38.52% of all FI) and 107,062 NFI (30.37% of all NFI).Mean SBA FI was 9.66 per event and mean SBA NFI was 19.77 per event compared to a mean NSBA FI of 1.09 per event and mean NSBA NFI of 3.20 per event.
Suicide bombing attacks are a unique terrorist methodology that can inflict wide-spread psychological damage as well as significantly higher death and injury tolls when compared to more traditional NSBA. They have been increasing in popularity amongst terrorist organizations and groups, and Counter-Terrorism Medicine (CTM) specialists need to be aware of the unique injury patterns and potential risk mitigation strategies associated with SBA depending on the target type, location, and gender of the perpetrator.
虽然战争背景下的自杀式爆炸袭击在历史上一直存在,但在反恐战争开始后的十年里,此类袭击呈指数级上升。此类袭击对医疗保健的影响是应急响应部门日益关注的问题,本研究对 1970 年至 2019 年期间所有与恐怖主义相关的爆炸事件进行了流行病学检查,比较了自杀式爆炸袭击(SBA)与非自杀式爆炸袭击(NSBA)之间致命伤(FI)和非致命伤(NFI)的发生率。
使用通过全球恐怖主义数据库(GTD)进行的回顾性数据库搜索进行数据收集。下载 GTD 数据库并使用内部数据库搜索功能搜索 1970 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间发生的所有事件。选择“爆炸/爆炸”作为主要的“袭击类型”和“爆炸物”作为主要的“武器类型”进行本研究,并且事件进一步细分为“自杀袭击”或“非自杀袭击”。结果导出到 Excel 电子表格(Microsoft Corp.;美国华盛顿州雷德蒙德)进行分析。
在研究期间,使用爆炸物记录了 82,217 起爆炸/爆炸恐怖袭击事件,造成 135,807 人死亡,352,500 人非致命伤。共有 5,416 起事件(所有事件的 6.59%)被细分为 SBA,造成 52,317 人 FI(所有 FI 的 38.52%)和 107,062 人 NFI(所有 NFI 的 30.37%)。SBA 的平均 FI 为每个事件 9.66,SBA 的平均 NFI 为每个事件 19.77,而 NSBA 的平均 FI 为每个事件 1.09,NSBA 的平均 NFI 为每个事件 3.20。
自杀式爆炸袭击是一种独特的恐怖主义手段,与更传统的 NSBA 相比,它不仅会造成广泛的心理伤害,还会造成更高的死亡和伤害人数。它们在恐怖组织和团体中的受欢迎程度不断提高,反恐医学(CTM)专家需要根据目标类型、位置和犯罪者的性别,了解与 SBA 相关的独特伤害模式和潜在的风险缓解策略。