• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

监管干预对西班牙阿戈美拉汀使用的影响:一项全国性电子医疗记录数据库中的多项干预时间序列分析。

Effect of regulatory interventions on agomelatine use in Spain: A multiple intervention time-series analysis in a nationwide electronic healthcare record database.

机构信息

Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance Division, Medicines for Human Use Department, Spanish Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS), Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022 Mar;31(3):294-301. doi: 10.1002/pds.5374. Epub 2021 Nov 8.

DOI:10.1002/pds.5374
PMID:34676940
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Liver injury is an important identified risk for agomelatine and several measures were put in place to prevent and minimize such risk. The study aims to assess the impact of four interventions on the incidence of agomelatine use, particularly among patients aged ≥75 in Spain between 2011 and 2018.

METHODS

Quasi-experimental interrupted time-series analysis to examine data from a nationwide electronic healthcare record database (BIFAP). Quarterly cumulative incidence of agomelatine use per 100 000 patients was calculated and the impact of four regulatory interventions was quantified.

RESULTS

The incidence of agomelatine use decreased by 85% and 87% from first quarter 2011 to last quarter 2018 in patients below and above 75 years old, respectively. Regulatory actions taken were not associated with an immediate and significant falling level of use or slope. The incidence was less than expected 6 months after the first and third intervention for patients below and above 75 years old, and more than expected after the second and fourth intervention for both populations, though these analyses were underpowered to observe significant results. The downward trend became less pronounced, reaching a residual level of use, which remained stable in the last segment of the study period.

CONCLUSION

New users of agomelatine decreased throughout the study period, starting before interventions took place. The effect of specific interventions might be masked by the progressive decrease tendency, constant over the study period. The effects of external factors that might overlap, unintended consequences, and issues concerning statistical modeling in situations where rates are already falling, should be considered when interpreting the results.

摘要

背景

肝损伤是阿戈美拉汀的一个重要确定风险,为此采取了多项措施来预防和尽量减少这种风险。本研究旨在评估四项干预措施对阿戈美拉汀使用发生率的影响,特别是在西班牙年龄≥75 岁的患者中。

方法

采用准实验性中断时间序列分析,对全国性电子医疗记录数据库(BIFAP)的数据进行分析。计算每 10 万名患者中阿戈美拉汀使用的季度累积发生率,并量化四项监管干预的影响。

结果

在年龄<75 岁和≥75 岁的患者中,阿戈美拉汀的使用发生率从 2011 年第一季度到 2018 年最后一个季度分别下降了 85%和 87%。采取的监管措施与使用水平的立即显著下降或斜率无关。在年龄<75 岁和≥75 岁的患者中,第一次和第三次干预后 6 个月内,发生率低于预期,而第二次和第四次干预后,两个年龄段的发生率均高于预期,但这些分析结果因样本量不足而无法观察到显著结果。下降趋势变得不那么明显,达到了一个剩余的使用水平,在研究后期保持稳定。

结论

在干预措施实施之前,新使用阿戈美拉汀的患者数量在整个研究期间持续减少。特定干预措施的效果可能被逐渐下降的趋势所掩盖,这种趋势在研究期间保持不变。在已经下降的情况下,应该考虑解释结果时应考虑外部因素的影响、意外后果以及与统计模型相关的问题。

相似文献

1
Effect of regulatory interventions on agomelatine use in Spain: A multiple intervention time-series analysis in a nationwide electronic healthcare record database.监管干预对西班牙阿戈美拉汀使用的影响:一项全国性电子医疗记录数据库中的多项干预时间序列分析。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022 Mar;31(3):294-301. doi: 10.1002/pds.5374. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
2
Melatonin and agomelatine for preventing seasonal affective disorder.褪黑素与阿戈美拉汀预防季节性情感障碍
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 17;6(6):CD011271. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011271.pub3.
3
Impact of Regulatory Interventions on Ulipristal Acetate 5 mg (Esmya) Use in Spain: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis.监管干预对西班牙屈螺酮 5mg(Esmya)使用的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2024 Sep;33(9):e70004. doi: 10.1002/pds.70004.
4
Melatonin and agomelatine for preventing seasonal affective disorder.褪黑素与阿戈美拉汀预防季节性情感障碍
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 11(11):CD011271. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011271.pub2.
5
Hepatotoxicity related to agomelatine and other new antidepressants: a case/noncase approach with information from the Portuguese, French, Spanish, and Italian pharmacovigilance systems.与阿戈美拉汀及其他新型抗抑郁药相关的肝毒性:采用病例/非病例方法并结合来自葡萄牙、法国、西班牙和意大利药物警戒系统的信息
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Jun;34(3):327-30. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000094.
6
Agomelatine Drug Utilisation Study in Selected European Countries: A Multinational, Observational Study to Assess Effectiveness of Risk-Minimisation Measures.欧洲部分国家阿戈美拉汀药物利用研究:一项评估风险最小化措施有效性的多国观察性研究。
Pharmaceut Med. 2019 Aug;33(4):311-319. doi: 10.1007/s40290-019-00291-2.
7
Agomelatine in Standard Medical Practice in Depressed Patients: Results of a 1-Year Multicentre Observational Study In France.在抑郁患者的标准医疗实践中使用阿戈美拉汀:法国多中心观察性研究的 1 年结果。
Clin Drug Investig. 2020 Nov;40(11):1009-1020. doi: 10.1007/s40261-020-00957-9.
8
Agomelatine prevents relapse in patients with major depressive disorder without evidence of a discontinuation syndrome: a 24-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.阿戈美拉汀可预防无停药综合征证据的重度抑郁症患者复发:一项为期24周的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Aug;70(8):1128-37. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04548. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
9
Efficacy of agomelatine in generalized anxiety disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.阿戈美拉汀治疗广泛性焦虑障碍的疗效:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Oct;28(5):561-6. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e318184ff5b.
10
Heart rate variability in major depressive disorder and after antidepressant treatment with agomelatine and paroxetine: Findings from the Taiwan Study of Depression and Anxiety (TAISDA).重度抑郁症及阿戈美拉汀与帕罗西汀抗抑郁治疗后的心率变异性:台湾抑郁与焦虑研究(TAISDA)的研究结果
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2016 Jan 4;64:60-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Mixed Impact of Direct Healthcare Professional Communications When Considering Proximal Outcomes and the Targeted Population: A Systematic Review.考虑近端结局和目标人群时直接医疗专业人员沟通的混合影响:一项系统评价
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2025 Mar;34(3):e70135. doi: 10.1002/pds.70135.