• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同种异体骨块增强胫距跟关节融合术的生物增强与高融合率相关。

Biologic Augmentation of Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With Allogeneic Bone Block Is Associated With High Rates of Fusion.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern Medicine Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

Department of Surgery (Plastic Surgery), Northwestern Medicine Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Int. 2022 Mar;43(3):353-362. doi: 10.1177/10711007211041336. Epub 2021 Oct 22.

DOI:10.1177/10711007211041336
PMID:34677103
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The orthopaedic conditions and systemic comorbidities that occur in patients who require bone block tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis have made this procedure associated with a higher-than-normal risk of nonunion, graft collapse, hardware failure, and amputation. Here, we present a novel approach to bone block TTC arthrodesis using adjunctive osteoinductive agents and a prolonged course of protected weightbearing to assess if we could improve on historical outcomes. We also evaluated the efficacy of a vascularized medial femoral condyle (MFC) free flap to augment TTC arthrodesis.

METHODS

Fourteen adult patients underwent bone block TTC arthrodesis biologically augmented with fresh-frozen femoral head allograft, bone marrow aspirate concentrate, and demineralized bone matrix cortical fibers. Three patients with soft tissue defects underwent vascularized reconstruction with an MFC free flap. Radiographic union, the Foot Function Index (FFI), and PROMIS pain interference (PI), and physical function (PF) scores were assessed at follow-up.

RESULTS

TTC fusion was documented on plain radiograph in 13 of 14 patients (92.9%) and CT in 10 of 11 patients (90.9%). Mean time to fusion was 183.2 ± 83.2 days. One patient (7.1%) experienced nonunion and persistent infection requiring amputation. Patients who underwent vascularized bone grafting had significantly shorter time to fusion (112.3 ± 31.7 days vs 204.4 ± 82.7 days, = .05). Patient-reported outcomes revealed mild to moderate pain and dysfunction after 1 year (mean FFI = 41.0% ± 23.1%, PROMIS PI = 58.3 ± 1.8, PROMIS PF = 39.0 ± 2.2).

CONCLUSION

In this relatively small series, the biologic augmentation of bone block TTC arthrodesis with osteoinductive agents and protective weightbearing resulted in excellent rates of fusion, modest pain, and preserved function of the lower extremity in almost all those treated. Osseous healing appears to be enhanced and accelerated with application of an MFC flap. We believe that this approach offers a viable salvage option for these challenging clinical problems.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

摘要

背景

需要进行骨块距下跟骰关节(TTC)融合术的患者常伴有骨科疾病和系统性合并症,这使得该手术的并发症发生率高于正常水平,包括不愈合、移植物塌陷、内固定失败和截肢。在这里,我们介绍一种使用辅助成骨剂和延长保护负重时间的新型骨块 TTC 融合术方法,以评估是否可以改善既往的结果。我们还评估了带血管的股骨内侧髁(MFC)游离皮瓣在增强 TTC 融合中的效果。

方法

14 名成年患者接受了使用新鲜冷冻股骨头同种异体骨、骨髓抽吸浓缩物和脱钙骨基质皮质纤维进行生物增强的骨块 TTC 融合术。3 名软组织缺损患者接受了带血管的 MFC 游离皮瓣重建。在随访时评估 TTC 融合的 X 线片、足部功能指数(FFI)、PROMIS 疼痛干扰(PI)和躯体功能(PF)评分。

结果

14 例患者中有 13 例(92.9%)在 X 线片上和 11 例患者中有 10 例(90.9%)在 CT 上显示 TTC 融合。平均融合时间为 183.2±83.2 天。1 例(7.1%)患者发生不愈合和持续性感染,需要截肢。接受带血管骨移植的患者融合时间明显缩短(112.3±31.7 天与 204.4±82.7 天,P=0.05)。患者报告的结果显示,1 年后疼痛和功能轻度至中度(平均 FFI=41.0%±23.1%,PROMIS PI=58.3±1.8,PROMIS PF=39.0±2.2)。

结论

在这个相对较小的系列中,使用成骨剂和保护性负重对骨块 TTC 融合进行生物增强,结果显示融合率高、疼痛适度且下肢功能保留良好。应用 MFC 皮瓣似乎可以增强和加速骨愈合。我们认为,这种方法为这些具有挑战性的临床问题提供了一种可行的挽救方案。

证据水平

IV 级,病例系列。

相似文献

1
Biologic Augmentation of Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With Allogeneic Bone Block Is Associated With High Rates of Fusion.同种异体骨块增强胫距跟关节融合术的生物增强与高融合率相关。
Foot Ankle Int. 2022 Mar;43(3):353-362. doi: 10.1177/10711007211041336. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
2
Applications of the medial femoral condyle free flap for foot and ankle reconstruction.股内侧髁游离皮瓣在足踝部重建中的应用。
Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Oct;34(10):1395-402. doi: 10.1177/1071100713491077. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
3
Medial Femoral Condyle Free Flap Reconstruction of Complex Foot and Ankle Pathology.股骨内侧髁游离皮瓣重建复杂足踝病变
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2019 Nov 7;4(4):2473011419884269. doi: 10.1177/2473011419884269. eCollection 2019 Oct.
4
Hindfoot Arthrodesis with the Blade Plate: Increased Risk of Complications and Nonunion in a Complex Patient Population.使用接骨板进行后足关节融合术:在复杂患者群体中并发症和骨不连风险增加
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2280-99. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4955-4. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
5
Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis with Structural Allograft for Management of Large Osseous Defects of the Hindfoot and Ankle: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.异体结构性植骨的跗骨与跟骨关节融合术治疗后足和踝关节大骨缺损:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Jul-Aug;61(4):900-906. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2022.01.003. Epub 2022 Jan 16.
6
Outcomes of Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Through a Posterior Achilles Tendon-Splitting Approach.经跟腱后入路胫距跟关节融合术的疗效
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Mar;37(3):312-9. doi: 10.1177/1071100715615398. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
7
Vascularized Pedicled Fibula Onlay Bone Graft Augmentation for Complicated Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With Retrograde Intramedullary Nail Fixation: A Case Series.带血管蒂腓骨嵌体骨移植联合逆行髓内钉固定治疗复杂胫距跟关节融合术:病例系列
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016 Jul-Aug;55(4):857-67. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.12.003. Epub 2016 Jan 23.
8
Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with bulk femoral head allograft for salvage of large defects in the ankle.带大量股骨头同种异体骨的胫距跟关节融合术治疗踝关节大缺损的保肢治疗。
Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Sep;34(9):1256-66. doi: 10.1177/1071100713488765. Epub 2013 May 6.
9
Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Using a Novel Retrograde Intramedullary Nail.应用新型逆行髓内钉行跗跖跟骨关节融合术
Foot Ankle Spec. 2020 Dec;13(6):463-469. doi: 10.1177/1938640019883138. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
10
Factors affecting the outcomes of tibiotalocalcaneal fusion.影响跟距舟关节融合术疗效的因素。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Mar;102-B(3):345-351. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B3.BJJ-2019-1325.R1.

引用本文的文献

1
Talar Allografts in Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis: A Salvage Approach for Complex Hindfoot Pathologies.距骨异体骨在胫距跟关节融合术中的应用:复杂后足病变的挽救性治疗方法
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 14;14(8):2683. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082683.
2
Complications and Early-Term Radiographic Analysis of a Novel Active Compression Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Nail With a Proximal Flexible Coil.一种新型近端柔性线圈主动加压胫距跟关节融合钉的并发症及早期影像学分析
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2025 Mar 18;10(1):24730114251323895. doi: 10.1177/24730114251323895. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Limited evidence to support demineralized bone matrix in foot and ankle surgical procedures: A systematic review.
支持脱矿骨基质用于足踝外科手术的证据有限:一项系统评价。
World J Orthop. 2025 Jan 18;16(1):97848. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i1.97848.
4
Free vascularized medial femoral condyle periosteal flaps in the ankle and foot region: A narrative review.游离股内侧髁骨膜瓣在踝关节和足部的应用:综述
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2024 Aug 14;35(3):574-582. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2024.1730.
5
Use of allograft bone matrix in clinical orthopedics.同种异体骨基质在临床骨科中的应用。
Regen Med. 2024 May 3;19(5):247-256. doi: 10.1080/17460751.2024.2353473. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
6
Comparison of different fibula procedures in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a retrograde intramedullary nail: a mid-term retrospective study.不同腓骨手术在逆行髓内钉固定距下跗关节融合术中的比较:一项中期回顾性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Nov 13;24(1):882. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-07025-1.
7
Outcomes of Arthroscopic Scaphoid Excision and Lunocapitate Fusion for Advanced Traumatic Arthritis of the Wrist.腕关节创伤性关节炎晚期行关节镜下舟骨切除和月骨融合的疗效。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2023 Apr;15(2):308-317. doi: 10.4055/cios22066. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
8
Clinical and Radiologic Outcome of First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis Using a Human Allogeneic Cortical Bone Screw.使用人同种异体皮质骨螺钉进行第一跖趾关节融合术的临床和放射学结果
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2022 Jul 29;7(3):24730114221112944. doi: 10.1177/24730114221112944. eCollection 2022 Jul.
9
Does Demineralized Bone Matrix Affect the Nonunion Rate in Arthroscopic Ankle Arthrodesis?脱矿骨基质会影响关节镜下踝关节融合术的骨不连发生率吗?
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 4;11(13):3893. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133893.