• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对自然视觉运动的神经反应在整个视野中具有空间选择性,不同脑区和任务的选择性不同。

Neural responses to natural visual motion are spatially selective across the visual field, with selectivity differing across brain areas and task.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of the City University of New York, New York, New York, USA.

U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Neurosci. 2021 Nov;54(10):7609-7625. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15503. Epub 2021 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1111/ejn.15503
PMID:34679237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9298375/
Abstract

It is well established that neural responses to visual stimuli are enhanced at select locations in the visual field. Although spatial selectivity and the effects of spatial attention are well understood for discrete tasks (e.g. visual cueing), little is known for naturalistic experience that involves continuous dynamic visual stimuli (e.g. driving). Here, we assess the strength of neural responses across the visual space during a kart-race game. Given the varying relevance of visual location in this task, we hypothesized that the strength of neural responses to movement will vary across the visual field, and it would differ between active play and passive viewing. To test this, we measure the correlation strength of scalp-evoked potentials with optical flow magnitude at individual locations on the screen. We find that neural responses are strongly correlated at task-relevant locations in visual space, extending beyond the focus of overt attention. Although the driver's gaze is directed upon the heading direction at the centre of the screen, neural responses were robust at the peripheral areas (e.g. roads and surrounding buildings). Importantly, neural responses to visual movement are broadly distributed across the scalp, with visual spatial selectivity differing across electrode locations. Moreover, during active gameplay, neural responses are enhanced at select locations in the visual space. Conventionally, spatial selectivity of neural response has been interpreted as an attentional gain mechanism. In the present study, the data suggest that different brain areas focus attention on different portions of the visual field that are task-relevant, beyond the focus of overt attention.

摘要

众所周知,在视觉场的特定位置,神经对视觉刺激的反应会增强。尽管对于离散任务(例如视觉提示),空间选择性和空间注意力的影响已经得到很好的理解,但对于涉及连续动态视觉刺激的自然体验(例如驾驶),知之甚少。在这里,我们评估了在赛车游戏过程中整个视觉空间的神经反应强度。鉴于在这项任务中视觉位置的变化相关性,我们假设对运动的神经反应强度将在整个视野中变化,并且在主动游戏和被动观看之间会有所不同。为了测试这一点,我们测量了头皮诱发电位与屏幕上各个位置的光流幅度之间的相关强度。我们发现,在视觉空间中与任务相关的位置,神经反应具有很强的相关性,这种相关性甚至超出了明显注意的焦点。尽管驾驶员的目光集中在屏幕中心的朝向方向,但在周边区域(例如道路和周围建筑物)也存在强大的神经反应。重要的是,视觉运动的神经反应在整个头皮上广泛分布,并且视觉空间选择性在电极位置之间有所不同。此外,在主动游戏期间,神经反应在视觉空间的特定位置增强。传统上,神经反应的空间选择性被解释为注意力增益机制。在本研究中,数据表明,不同的大脑区域将注意力集中在视觉场中与任务相关的不同部分,而这些部分超出了明显注意的焦点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ad1/9298375/fbd2309e279d/EJN-54-7609-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ad1/9298375/c2f1aae43836/EJN-54-7609-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ad1/9298375/096302f44753/EJN-54-7609-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ad1/9298375/4317d431c44c/EJN-54-7609-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ad1/9298375/bcdbb09506d4/EJN-54-7609-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ad1/9298375/bf16e6d92607/EJN-54-7609-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ad1/9298375/fbd2309e279d/EJN-54-7609-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ad1/9298375/c2f1aae43836/EJN-54-7609-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ad1/9298375/096302f44753/EJN-54-7609-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ad1/9298375/4317d431c44c/EJN-54-7609-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ad1/9298375/bcdbb09506d4/EJN-54-7609-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ad1/9298375/bf16e6d92607/EJN-54-7609-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ad1/9298375/fbd2309e279d/EJN-54-7609-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Neural responses to natural visual motion are spatially selective across the visual field, with selectivity differing across brain areas and task.对自然视觉运动的神经反应在整个视野中具有空间选择性,不同脑区和任务的选择性不同。
Eur J Neurosci. 2021 Nov;54(10):7609-7625. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15503. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
2
Visually evoked responses are enhanced when engaging in a video game.玩电子游戏时,视觉诱发反应会增强。
Eur J Neurosci. 2020 Dec;52(12):4695-4708. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14924. Epub 2020 Aug 30.
3
Spatial Scaling of the Profile of Selective Attention in the Visual Field.视野中选择性注意轮廓的空间尺度
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 8;11(9):e0162190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162190. eCollection 2016.
4
Changes in the distribution of sustained attention alter the perceived structure of visual space.持续注意力分布的变化会改变视觉空间的感知结构。
Vision Res. 2017 Feb;131:26-36. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
5
ERP correlates of anticipatory attention: spatial and non-spatial specificity and relation to subsequent selective attention.预期性注意的事件相关电位关联:空间和非空间特异性以及与后续选择性注意的关系
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Jun;188(1):45-62. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1338-4. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
6
Attention improves encoding of task-relevant features in the human visual cortex.注意提高了人类视觉皮层中与任务相关特征的编码。
J Neurosci. 2011 Jun 1;31(22):8210-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6153-09.2011.
7
From local inhibition to long-range integration: a functional dissociation of alpha-band synchronization across cortical scales in visuospatial attention.从局部抑制到长程整合:视空间注意中皮质尺度上 alpha 频段同步的功能分离。
Brain Res. 2009 Dec 15;1303:97-110. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.09.069. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
8
Attentional modulation of neural responses to illusory shapes: Evidence from steady-state and evoked visual potentials.注意对幻觉形状的神经反应的调制:稳态和诱发视觉电位的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Mar 4;125:70-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.01.017. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
9
Global feature-based attention to orientation.基于全局特征的方向注意力。
J Vis. 2011 Sep 15;11(10):8. doi: 10.1167/11.10.8.
10
Is that a belt or a snake? Object attentional selection affects the early stages of visual sensory processing.那是一条腰带还是一条蛇?物体注意选择会影响视觉感觉处理的早期阶段。
Behav Brain Funct. 2012 Feb 2;8:6. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-8-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Computational assessment of visual coding across mouse brain areas and behavioural states.跨小鼠脑区和行为状态的视觉编码的计算评估。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2023 Oct 13;17:1269019. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2023.1269019. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
During natural viewing, neural processing of visual targets continues throughout saccades.在自然观察过程中,视觉目标的神经处理在扫视期间持续进行。
J Vis. 2021 Sep 1;21(10):7. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.10.7.
2
The importance of peripheral vision when searching 3D real-world scenes: A gaze-contingent study in virtual reality.搜索三维真实场景时周边视觉的重要性:虚拟现实中的一项基于注视的研究。
J Vis. 2021 Jul 6;21(7):3. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.7.3.
3
Regression-based analysis of combined EEG and eye-tracking data: Theory and applications.基于回归的脑电图与眼动追踪数据联合分析:理论与应用
J Vis. 2021 Jan 4;21(1):3. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.1.3.
4
Establishing the separable contributions of spatial attention and saccade preparation across tasks with varying acuity demands.在具有不同敏锐度要求的任务中,确定空间注意和眼跳准备的可分离贡献。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Feb;47(2):172-188. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000881. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
5
Visually evoked responses are enhanced when engaging in a video game.玩电子游戏时,视觉诱发反应会增强。
Eur J Neurosci. 2020 Dec;52(12):4695-4708. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14924. Epub 2020 Aug 30.
6
Visual attention is not limited to the oculomotor range.视觉注意力不仅局限于眼球运动范围。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 May 7;116(19):9665-9670. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1813465116. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
7
EEG can predict speech intelligibility.脑电图可以预测言语可懂度。
J Neural Eng. 2019 Jun;16(3):036008. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab07fe. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
8
Electrophysiological Correlates of Semantic Dissimilarity Reflect the Comprehension of Natural, Narrative Speech.语义相似度的电生理相关性反映了对自然、叙事性言语的理解。
Curr Biol. 2018 Mar 5;28(5):803-809.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.080. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
9
Decoding the auditory brain with canonical component analysis.用典范成分分析解码听觉大脑。
Neuroimage. 2018 May 15;172:206-216. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.033. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
10
Encoding and Decoding Models in Cognitive Electrophysiology.认知神经电生理学中的编码与解码模型
Front Syst Neurosci. 2017 Sep 26;11:61. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2017.00061. eCollection 2017.