Jeon Ji Yoon, Kim Cheol-Soon, Kim Jung-Suk, Choi Sung-Hwan
Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul 03722, Korea.
Private Clinic, Seongnam-si 13615, Korea.
Children (Basel). 2021 Oct 13;8(10):910. doi: 10.3390/children8100910.
This retrospective observational study aimed to examine the correlation and correspondence between skeletal maturation indicators (SMI), cervical vertebral maturation indicators (CVMI), and radius-ulna-short bones (RUS) skeletal maturity scores in Korean adolescents, and to determine whether easily obtainable SMI or CVMI can replace the RUS skeletal maturity score. A total of 1017 participants were included with both hand-wrist radiograph and lateral cephalogram acquired concurrently. From the lateral cephalogram, CVMI was determined; through the hand-wrist radiograph, SMI was categorized, and the RUS skeletal maturity score was evaluated as well. Associations were examined using the Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman's rank-order correlation analysis, and multiple correspondence analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in chronological age between males and females; however, the SMI, CVMI, and RUS skeletal maturity scores were significantly higher in females. The SMI, CVMI, and RUS skeletal maturity scores showed a statistically significant strong degree of both positive correlation and correspondence. However, a precisely corresponding RUS skeletal maturity score was difficult to obtain for a specific CVMI and SMI stage, implying the absence of a quantitative correlation. In conclusion, detailed evaluation should be conducted using the RUS skeletal maturity score, preferably in cases that require bone age determination or residual growth estimation.
这项回顾性观察性研究旨在探讨韩国青少年骨骼成熟指标(SMI)、颈椎成熟指标(CVMI)与桡尺短骨(RUS)骨骼成熟评分之间的相关性和对应性,并确定易于获取的SMI或CVMI是否可以替代RUS骨骼成熟评分。共有1017名参与者同时获得了手腕部X光片和头颅侧位片。从头颅侧位片中确定CVMI;通过手腕部X光片对SMI进行分类,并评估RUS骨骼成熟评分。使用曼-惠特尼U检验、斯皮尔曼等级相关分析和多重对应分析来检验相关性。男性和女性的实际年龄没有统计学上的显著差异;然而,女性的SMI、CVMI和RUS骨骼成熟评分显著更高。SMI、CVMI和RUS骨骼成熟评分在统计学上显示出显著的强正相关和对应程度。然而,对于特定的CVMI和SMI阶段,很难获得精确对应的RUS骨骼成熟评分,这意味着不存在定量相关性。总之,应使用RUS骨骼成熟评分进行详细评估,最好是在需要确定骨龄或估计剩余生长的情况下。