Wurm Markus, Zyskowski Michael, Pesch Sebastian, Biberthaler Peter, Kirchhoff Chlodwig, Beirer Marc
Department of Trauma Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 13;10(20):4685. doi: 10.3390/jcm10204685.
Operative therapy for unstable lateral clavicle fractures is necessary to reduce the risk of bony non-union. Irritation and restriction during sportive activities due to the implanted materials are a common reason for impaired function and implant removal. The aim of this study was to gain information on functional outcome and time until return to sport (RTS) after surgical treatment of unstable lateral clavicle fractures, comparing two coracoclavicular button techniques.
A retrospective chart review of patients who were consecutively treated for unstable lateral clavicle fractures at our level one trauma center from 2014 to 2018 was conducted. Two different surgical techniques were evaluated and compared. Group 1 was treated using a locking compression plate and knotted DogBone™ Button, while group 2 received an LCP and knotless DogBone™ Button. Functional outcome (ASES (American Shoulder and Elbow Score), Constant-Score, DASH (Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand), MSQ (Munich Shoulder Questionnaire) and SPADI (Shoulder Pain and Disability Index) and time until RTS were investigated and compared between both groups, 1 year postoperatively.
A total of 56 patients ( = 35 group 1, = 21 group 2) with a mean age of 45.1 ± 14.6 years met the inclusion criteria. Functional outcome reached good to excellent results (ASES 94.7 ± 9.8, Constant Score 85.1 ± 8.1, DASH 5.5 ± 8.4, MSQ 90.9 ± 7.2, SPADI 96.1 ± 5.7). Implant removal rates were higher in group 1 (48.3% vs. 35.3%) yet without statistical significance ( = 0.122). All patients returned to sports postoperatively with a mean time period until return to sport of 4.6 (3-9) months.
Locking compression plating and coracoclavicular fixation using a knotless Dogbone™ technique provides good to excellent functional outcomes, a high and fast rate of return to sport and lower irritation rates compared to the knotted DogBone™ technique.
对于不稳定型锁骨外侧端骨折,手术治疗对于降低骨不连风险是必要的。植入材料在体育活动中引起的刺激和限制是功能受损及取出植入物的常见原因。本研究的目的是获取关于不稳定型锁骨外侧端骨折手术治疗后功能结果及恢复运动(RTS)所需时间的信息,比较两种喙锁纽扣技术。
对2014年至2018年在我们的一级创伤中心连续接受不稳定型锁骨外侧端骨折治疗的患者进行回顾性病历审查。评估并比较了两种不同的手术技术。第1组采用锁定加压钢板和打结的DogBone™纽扣进行治疗,而第2组接受锁定加压钢板和无结DogBone™纽扣。术后1年,对两组的功能结果(美国肩肘评分(ASES)、Constant评分、上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍评分(DASH)、慕尼黑肩部问卷(MSQ)和肩部疼痛与功能障碍指数(SPADI))以及恢复运动所需时间进行调查和比较。
共有56例患者(第1组35例,第2组21例)符合纳入标准,平均年龄为45.1±14.6岁。功能结果达到良好至优秀水平(ASES 94.7±9.8,Constant评分85.1±8.1,DASH 5.5±8.4,MSQ 9 + 90.9±7.2,SPADI 96.1±5.7)。第1组的植入物取出率较高(48.3%对35.3%),但无统计学意义(P = 0.122)。所有患者术后均恢复运动,恢复运动的平均时间为4.6(3 - 9)个月。
与打结的DogBone™技术相比,使用无结DogBone™技术进行锁定加压钢板固定和喙锁固定可提供良好至优秀的功能结果、较高且快速的恢复运动率以及较低的刺激率。