Villa Giulia, Pennestrì Federico, Rosa Debora, Giannetta Noemi, Sala Roberta, Mordacci Roberto, Manara Duilio Fiorenzo
Center for Nursing Research and Innovation, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Faculty of Philosophy, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Sep 30;9(10):1307. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9101307.
Moral distress has frequently been investigated in single healthcare settings and concerning a single type of professional. This study aimed to describe the experience of moral distress in all the types of professionals providing daily care to elderly patients and residents. The Grounded Theory approach, developed by Corbin and Strauss, was used. This study included participants from hospital and nursing homes of northern Italy. Purposive and theoretical sampling was used. Between December 2020 and April 2021, semi-structured interviews were conducted. Thirteen participants were included in the study. Four categories were derived from the data: talking and listening, care provider wellbeing, decision making, protective factors, and potential solutions. The core category identified was "sharing daily". Interviewees confirm how hard it may be to communicate to the elderly, but at the same time, how adequate communication with the leader is a protective factor of moral distress. They also confirm how communication is key to managing or downsizing misunderstandings at all levels. Findings highlight the scarcity of operators as a fundamental trigger of moral distress. Many determinants of this phenomenon lie behind the direct control of professionals, but education can help them learn how to prevent, manage, or downsize the consequences.
道德困扰经常在单一的医疗环境中针对单一类型的专业人员进行研究。本研究旨在描述为老年患者和居民提供日常护理的各类专业人员的道德困扰经历。采用了由科尔宾和施特劳斯开发的扎根理论方法。本研究纳入了意大利北部医院和养老院的参与者。采用了目的抽样和理论抽样。在2020年12月至2021年4月期间进行了半结构化访谈。13名参与者被纳入研究。从数据中得出了四个类别:交谈与倾听、护理提供者的福祉、决策、保护因素和潜在解决方案。确定的核心类别是“日常分享”。受访者证实了与老年人沟通可能有多困难,但同时,与领导者进行充分沟通是道德困扰的一个保护因素。他们还证实了沟通是在各级管理或减少误解的关键。研究结果强调人员短缺是道德困扰的一个根本触发因素。这一现象的许多决定因素都在于专业人员的直接控制,但教育可以帮助他们学习如何预防、管理或减少后果。