Suppr超能文献

采用不同分层技术应用的体外Ⅱ类直接树脂复合体修复体的粘结状态

Bonding States of In Vitro Class 2 Direct Resin Composite Restoration Applied by Various Incremental Techniques.

作者信息

Okada Misato, Maeno Masahiko, Nara Yoichiro

机构信息

Department of Adhesive Dentistry, School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo, The Nippon Dental University, 1-9-20 Fujimi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-8159, Japan.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2021 Oct 13;14(20):6037. doi: 10.3390/ma14206037.

Abstract

Incremental techniques are always required for clinical cases of deep and/or large cavities restored with resin composite materials. The purpose of this study was to examine the bonding states of class 2 direct resin composite restoration applied by various incremental techniques after cyclic loading to simulate the intra-oral environment to define the appropriate technique. Three types of resin composites, namely, bulk-fill (B), flowable (F), and conventional resin composite (C), were applied to standardized class 2 cavities by incremental techniques with single- or bi-resin restoratives. After cyclic loading, the micro-tensile bond strength (μ-TBS) of the dentin cavity floor was measured. The Weibull modulus and Weibull stress values at 10%/90% probability of failure were analyzed. Single-resin incremental restorations with B or F and bi-resin incremental restorations with F + B and F + C demonstrated superior μ-TBS (quantitative ability), bonding reliability, and durability (qualitative ability) compared with the single-resin restoration with C (as control). Furthermore, F + B and F + C restoration yielded an excellent performance compared with the single-resin restorations with B, F, and C. In particular, the F + C restoration, which indicates not only the maximum mean µ-TBS, but also the highest values of the Weibull parameters, may be the optimal restoration method, including the esthetic benefits.

摘要

对于用树脂复合材料修复的深和/或大窝洞的临床病例,总是需要采用分层技术。本研究的目的是检查在模拟口腔环境的循环加载后,通过各种分层技术应用的2类直接树脂复合材料修复体的粘结状态,以确定合适的技术。三种类型的树脂复合材料,即大块充填型(B)、流动型(F)和传统树脂复合材料(C),通过使用单树脂或双树脂修复材料的分层技术应用于标准化的2类窝洞。在循环加载后,测量牙本质洞底的微拉伸粘结强度(μ-TBS)。分析了失效概率为10%/90%时的威布尔模量和威布尔应力值。与作为对照的单树脂C修复体相比,使用B或F的单树脂分层修复体以及使用F + B和F + C的双树脂分层修复体表现出更好的μ-TBS(定量能力)、粘结可靠性和耐久性(定性能力)。此外,与使用B、F和C的单树脂修复体相比,F + B和F + C修复体表现出优异的性能。特别是,F + C修复体不仅显示出最大的平均μ-TBS,而且威布尔参数值最高,可能是最佳的修复方法,包括美学益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1ab/8541412/5768227b1d31/materials-14-06037-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验