• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Vulnerability Factors among Women Victimized by Intimate Partner Violence and the Presence of Children.亲密伴侣暴力受害女性中的脆弱因素及子女的存在情况。
J Fam Violence. 2022;37(7):1057-1069. doi: 10.1007/s10896-021-00328-8. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
2
Rural Differences in Victim Vulnerability and Revictimization of Intimate Partner Violence.亲密伴侣暴力中受害者脆弱性及再次受害情况的农村差异
Violence Vict. 2023 Apr 1;38(2):185-202. doi: 10.1891/VV-2022-0046. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
3
The Influence of Victim Vulnerability and Gender on Police Officers' Assessment of Intimate Partner Violence Risk.受害者脆弱性和性别对警察评估亲密伴侣暴力风险的影响
J Fam Violence. 2017;32(1):125-134. doi: 10.1007/s10896-016-9905-0. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
4
Intimate partner violence during COVID-19 lockdown in Norway: the increase of police reports.新冠疫情封锁期间挪威的亲密伴侣暴力:警方报案数量增加。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec 16;21(1):2292. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12408-x.
5
Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization--national intimate partner and sexual violence survey, United States, 2011.性暴力、跟踪和亲密伴侣暴力受害的流行率和特征——2011 年美国全国亲密伴侣和性暴力调查。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Sep 5;63(8):1-18.
6
When the Cop Is the Victim: A Test of Target Congruence Theory on Intimate Partner Violence Victimization Experienced by Police Officers.当警察成为受害者:目标一致性理论在警察遭受亲密伴侣暴力侵害中的检验。
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Sep;35(17-18):3622-3642. doi: 10.1177/0886260517709801. Epub 2017 May 29.
7
Prevalence and Factors Associated With Intimate Partner Violence Among Women in Haiti: Understanding Household, Individual, Partner, and Relationship Characteristics.海地妇女中与亲密伴侣暴力相关的流行情况和因素:理解家庭、个人、伴侣和关系特征。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Dec;36(23-24):11356-11384. doi: 10.1177/0886260519898443. Epub 2020 Jan 12.
8
Children, Parental Alcohol Consumption, and Intimate Partner Violence: A Multicountry Analysis by Perpetration Versus Victimization and Sex.儿童、父母饮酒与亲密伴侣暴力:基于加害与受害及性别视角的多国家分析。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jun;36(11-12):5608-5634. doi: 10.1177/0886260518804182. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
9
Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Violence: A Comparison of Antisocial and Family-Only Perpetrators.亲密伴侣暴力的风险因素:反社会型施暴者与仅涉及家庭内部施暴者的比较
J Interpers Violence. 2019 Jan;34(2):219-239. doi: 10.1177/0886260516640547. Epub 2016 Mar 27.
10
Predictors of Severe Intimate Partner Violence Among Antisocial and Family-Only Perpetrators: Victims' and Offenders' Characteristics.反社会型和仅家庭型施害者中严重亲密伴侣暴力的预测因素:受害者和施害者的特征。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Mar;37(5-6):NP2791-NP2822. doi: 10.1177/0886260520943714. Epub 2020 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Police-reported family violence: are there differences amongst South Asian Australians and Australian-born Australians?警方报告的家庭暴力:澳大利亚南亚裔人与澳大利亚出生的澳大利亚人之间存在差异吗?
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2024 Jan 11;32(1):68-91. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2280517. eCollection 2025.
2
Beyond the Initial Assault: Characterizing Revictimization in Intimate Partner Violence and Its Implications for Women's Health.超越初始侵害:亲密伴侣暴力中的再受害特征及其对女性健康的影响。
Psychosoc Interv. 2024 May 1;33(2):65-72. doi: 10.5093/pi2024a4. eCollection 2024 May.

本文引用的文献

1
A Blue Step Forward: An Exploratory Study of Law Enforcement Perceptions of Intimate Partner Violence in the Southern United States.向前迈出的蓝色一步:美国南部执法部门对亲密伴侣暴力认知的探索性研究
J Interpers Violence. 2022 May;37(9-10):NP6514-NP6534. doi: 10.1177/0886260520966675. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
2
Barriers to police addressing risk to children exposed to domestic violence.警察在处理遭受家庭暴力的儿童所面临的风险时遇到的障碍。
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Aug;106:104554. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104554. Epub 2020 May 24.
3
Remembering the forgotten victims: Child-Related themes in domestic violence fatality reviews.记住被遗忘的受害者:家庭暴力致死案件回顾中的儿童相关主题。
Child Abuse Negl. 2019 Dec;98:104223. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104223. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
4
Mothers and Children Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence: A Review of Treatment Interventions.暴露于亲密伴侣暴力下的母亲和儿童:治疗干预措施的综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 7;15(9):1955. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091955.
5
Victims of Domestic Violence in Shelters: Impacts on Women and Children.庇护所中的家庭暴力受害者:对妇女和儿童的影响
Span J Psychol. 2018 Jun 1;21:E18. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2018.21.
6
Risk and Protective Factors for Intimate Partner Violence Against Women: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Prospective-Longitudinal Studies.风险和保护因素与针对妇女的亲密伴侣暴力:前瞻性纵向研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Jul;108(7):e1-e11. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304428. Epub 2018 May 17.
7
Intimate Partner Violence in Urban, Rural, and Remote Areas: An Investigation of Offense Severity and Risk Factors.城乡及偏远地区的亲密伴侣暴力:犯罪严重程度和风险因素调查。
Violence Against Women. 2019 Feb;25(2):188-207. doi: 10.1177/1077801218766611. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
8
The Influence of Victim Vulnerability and Gender on Police Officers' Assessment of Intimate Partner Violence Risk.受害者脆弱性和性别对警察评估亲密伴侣暴力风险的影响
J Fam Violence. 2017;32(1):125-134. doi: 10.1007/s10896-016-9905-0. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
9
Secondary Victimization: Domestic Violence Survivors Navigating the Family Law System.二次受害:家庭暴力幸存者在家庭法律体系中的困境。
Violence Against Women. 2017 Oct;23(11):1314-1335. doi: 10.1177/1077801216659942. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
10
Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Violence: A Comparison of Antisocial and Family-Only Perpetrators.亲密伴侣暴力的风险因素:反社会型施暴者与仅涉及家庭内部施暴者的比较
J Interpers Violence. 2019 Jan;34(2):219-239. doi: 10.1177/0886260516640547. Epub 2016 Mar 27.

亲密伴侣暴力受害女性中的脆弱因素及子女的存在情况。

Vulnerability Factors among Women Victimized by Intimate Partner Violence and the Presence of Children.

作者信息

Petersson Joakim, Thunberg Sara

机构信息

School of Law, Psychology and Social Work, Örebro University, Fakultetsgatan 1, 702 82 Örebro, Sweden.

出版信息

J Fam Violence. 2022;37(7):1057-1069. doi: 10.1007/s10896-021-00328-8. Epub 2021 Oct 18.

DOI:10.1007/s10896-021-00328-8
PMID:34690422
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8520893/
Abstract

This study aimed to a) examine the presence of children in relation to victim vulnerability factors and assessed risk for intimate partner violence (IPV) re-victimization, and b) examine the police response, in terms of risk management, in IPV cases with and without children, respectively. Data from a sample of 1407 women who had reported IPV victimization to the Swedish police was analyzed. The material consisted of risk assessments conducted by the police using the Swedish version of the Brief Spousal Assault Form for the Evaluation of Risk (B-SAFER) checklist, as well as the recommended risk management strategies. A series of chi-square tests of independence revealed that women with and without children, respectively, displayed different vulnerability factors to different extents. Women with children expressed more extreme fear of the perpetrator and were more likely to have an unsafe living situation, whereas women without children displayed more inconsistent attitudes or behaviors and health problems. However, binary logistic regression analyses showed that the victim vulnerability factors that were most strongly associated with an elevated risk rating for IPV re-victimization were generally the same for both groups of victims. Finally, the presence of children was related to a higher risk rating for imminent IPV re-victimization and to recommendations of more than standard levels of risk management strategies. The results indicate that the Swedish police consider the presence of children in relation to a victim's risk for re-victimization as well as in terms of recommended risk management strategies.

摘要

本研究旨在

a)考察儿童的存在与受害者脆弱性因素的关系,并评估亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)再次受害的风险;b)分别考察在有儿童和无儿童的IPV案件中,警方在风险管理方面的应对措施。对向瑞典警方报案称遭受IPV侵害的1407名女性样本的数据进行了分析。材料包括警方使用瑞典版《简易配偶攻击风险评估表》(B-SAFER)清单进行的风险评估,以及推荐的风险管理策略。一系列独立性卡方检验表明,有儿童和无儿童的女性分别在不同程度上表现出不同的脆弱性因素。有儿童的女性对施暴者表现出更极度的恐惧,且更有可能生活在不安全的环境中,而无儿童的女性则表现出更多不一致的态度或行为以及健康问题。然而,二元逻辑回归分析表明,两组受害者中,与IPV再次受害风险评级升高最密切相关的受害者脆弱性因素通常是相同的。最后,儿童的存在与IPV近期再次受害的较高风险评级以及高于标准水平的风险管理策略建议相关。结果表明,瑞典警方在考虑受害者再次受害风险以及推荐的风险管理策略时会顾及儿童的存在。