Gozzo Lucia, Romano Giovanni Luca, Romano Francesca, Brancati Serena, Longo Laura, Vitale Daniela Cristina, Drago Filippo
Clinical Pharmacology Unit/Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre, University Hospital of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Oct 8;12:755052. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.755052. eCollection 2021.
Even for centrally approved products, each European country is responsible for the effective national market access. This step can result in inequalities in terms of access, due to different opinions about the therapeutic value assessed by health technology assessment (HTA) bodies. Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) represent a major issue with regard to the HTA in order to make them available at a national level. These products are based on genes, tissues, or cells, commonly developed as one-shot treatment for rare or ultrarare diseases and mandatorily authorized by the EMA with a central procedure. This study aims to provide a comparative analysis of HTA recommendations issued by European countries (France, Germany, and Italy) following EMA approval of ATMPs. We found a low rate of agreement on the therapeutic value (in particular the "" compared to the standard of care) of ATMPs. Despite the differences in terms of clinical assessment, the access has been usually guaranteed, even with different timing and limitations. In view of the importance of ATMPs as innovative therapies for unmet needs, it is crucial to understand and act on the causes of disagreement among the HTA. In addition, the adoption of the new EU regulation on HTA would be useful to reduce disparities of medicine's assessment among European countries.
即使是获得中央批准的产品,每个欧洲国家仍负责其在本国市场的有效准入。由于卫生技术评估(HTA)机构对治疗价值的评估存在不同意见,这一步骤可能导致准入方面的不平等。为了使先进治疗药品(ATMPs)在国家层面可用,它们在HTA方面是一个重大问题。这些产品基于基因、组织或细胞,通常作为针对罕见或超罕见疾病的一次性治疗方法开发,并通过集中程序由欧洲药品管理局(EMA)强制授权。本研究旨在对欧洲国家(法国、德国和意大利)在EMA批准ATMPs后发布的HTA建议进行比较分析。我们发现,对于ATMPs的治疗价值(特别是与护理标准相比),各国之间的共识率较低。尽管在临床评估方面存在差异,但通常都能保证药品的准入,即使时间和限制有所不同。鉴于ATMPs作为满足未满足需求的创新疗法的重要性,了解HTA之间存在分歧的原因并采取相应行动至关重要。此外,采用新的欧盟HTA法规将有助于减少欧洲国家之间药品评估的差异。