Suppr超能文献

先进治疗药品的卫生技术评估:三个欧洲国家之间的比较

Health Technology Assessment of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products: Comparison Among 3 European Countries.

作者信息

Gozzo Lucia, Romano Giovanni Luca, Romano Francesca, Brancati Serena, Longo Laura, Vitale Daniela Cristina, Drago Filippo

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacology Unit/Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre, University Hospital of Catania, Catania, Italy.

Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2021 Oct 8;12:755052. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.755052. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Even for centrally approved products, each European country is responsible for the effective national market access. This step can result in inequalities in terms of access, due to different opinions about the therapeutic value assessed by health technology assessment (HTA) bodies. Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) represent a major issue with regard to the HTA in order to make them available at a national level. These products are based on genes, tissues, or cells, commonly developed as one-shot treatment for rare or ultrarare diseases and mandatorily authorized by the EMA with a central procedure. This study aims to provide a comparative analysis of HTA recommendations issued by European countries (France, Germany, and Italy) following EMA approval of ATMPs. We found a low rate of agreement on the therapeutic value (in particular the "" compared to the standard of care) of ATMPs. Despite the differences in terms of clinical assessment, the access has been usually guaranteed, even with different timing and limitations. In view of the importance of ATMPs as innovative therapies for unmet needs, it is crucial to understand and act on the causes of disagreement among the HTA. In addition, the adoption of the new EU regulation on HTA would be useful to reduce disparities of medicine's assessment among European countries.

摘要

即使是获得中央批准的产品,每个欧洲国家仍负责其在本国市场的有效准入。由于卫生技术评估(HTA)机构对治疗价值的评估存在不同意见,这一步骤可能导致准入方面的不平等。为了使先进治疗药品(ATMPs)在国家层面可用,它们在HTA方面是一个重大问题。这些产品基于基因、组织或细胞,通常作为针对罕见或超罕见疾病的一次性治疗方法开发,并通过集中程序由欧洲药品管理局(EMA)强制授权。本研究旨在对欧洲国家(法国、德国和意大利)在EMA批准ATMPs后发布的HTA建议进行比较分析。我们发现,对于ATMPs的治疗价值(特别是与护理标准相比),各国之间的共识率较低。尽管在临床评估方面存在差异,但通常都能保证药品的准入,即使时间和限制有所不同。鉴于ATMPs作为满足未满足需求的创新疗法的重要性,了解HTA之间存在分歧的原因并采取相应行动至关重要。此外,采用新的欧盟HTA法规将有助于减少欧洲国家之间药品评估的差异。

相似文献

7
Market access pathways for cell therapies in France.法国细胞疗法的市场准入途径。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2015 Nov 18;3. doi: 10.3402/jmahp.v3.29094. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

6
Editorial: Innovative treatments for neuro-psychiatric diseases.社论:神经精神疾病的创新疗法
Front Neurosci. 2023 Jul 7;17:1247681. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1247681. eCollection 2023.
7
Fluoxetine Protects Retinal Ischemic Damage in Mice.氟西汀可保护小鼠视网膜缺血性损伤。
Pharmaceutics. 2023 Apr 29;15(5):1370. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15051370.

本文引用的文献

6
Implementation of Value-based Pricing for Medicines.药品基于价值的定价实施。
Clin Ther. 2020 Jan;42(1):15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.11.006. Epub 2019 Dec 24.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验