Li Wenyue, Song Yi, Sun Wanshu, Yang Xi, Liu Xuebo, Sun Lijun
College of Food Science and Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang, China.
Front Nutr. 2021 Oct 7;8:766756. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.766756. eCollection 2021.
The inhibition mechanism of four caffeic and tartaric acid derivates, including caffeic acid (CA), tartaric acid (TA), caftaric acid (CFA) and chicoric acid (CHA) against α-glucosidase was characterized by substrate depletion, fluorescence quenching, isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) and molecular docking. TA and CA were found with the highest and no inhibition effect respectively, and caffeoyl substitution at 2 and/or 3-OH of TA significantly decreased its inhibition. The enzyme inhibition effects of organic acids were not in an inhibitor concentration-dependent mode, and there was a rush increase in inhibition at a respective acidic pH value, especially for CFA and CHA, suggesting the important role of acidic pH in the enzyme inhibition for both compounds. Besides, CA, CFA and CHA were shown with strong quenching effects on α-glucosidase fluorescence because of π-conjugations between aromatic ring of caffeoyl moiety and that of enzyme fluorescent residues. However, no fluorescence quenching effect was observed for TA due to lack of aromatic ring. Additionally, a direct binding interaction behavior was observed for TA with α-glucosidase according to the fitted independent binding model in ITC, but not for CFA and CHA. Therefore, both acidic pH and binding interactions of TA with α-glucosidase resulted in the enzyme inhibition.
通过底物消耗、荧光猝灭、等温滴定量热法(ITC)和分子对接等方法,对包括咖啡酸(CA)、酒石酸(TA)、咖啡酰酒石酸(CFA)和菊苣酸(CHA)在内的四种咖啡酸和酒石酸衍生物对α-葡萄糖苷酶的抑制机制进行了表征。结果发现,TA的抑制作用最强,而CA没有抑制作用,并且在TA的2-和/或3-羟基处进行咖啡酰取代会显著降低其抑制作用。有机酸对酶的抑制作用并非呈抑制剂浓度依赖性模式,并且在各自的酸性pH值下抑制作用会急剧增加,尤其是对于CFA和CHA,这表明酸性pH值在这两种化合物对酶的抑制作用中起着重要作用。此外,由于咖啡酰部分的芳香环与酶荧光残基的芳香环之间存在π共轭,CA、CFA和CHA对α-葡萄糖苷酶荧光具有很强的猝灭作用。然而,由于缺乏芳香环,未观察到TA的荧光猝灭效应。此外,根据ITC中的拟合独立结合模型,观察到TA与α-葡萄糖苷酶存在直接的结合相互作用行为,但CFA和CHA则没有。因此,酸性pH值以及TA与α-葡萄糖苷酶的结合相互作用均导致了酶抑制作用。