• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于预测马匹结局的绞痛评分系统的开发。

Development of a Colic Scoring System to Predict Outcome in Horses.

作者信息

Farrell Alanna, Kersh Kevin, Liepman Rachel, Dembek Katarzyna A

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.

Chaparral Veterinary Medical Center, Cave Creek, AZ, United States.

出版信息

Front Vet Sci. 2021 Oct 8;8:697589. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.697589. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fvets.2021.697589
PMID:34692803
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8531487/
Abstract

Acute abdominal pain in the horse is a common emergency presenting to equine practices. The wide variety of etiologies makes prognosticating survival a challenge. A retrospective, multi-institutional clinical study was performed to determine clinical parameters associated with survival of horses with colic, and to use them to develop a colic survival scoring system. The scoring system was then validated using clinical data in the prospective portion of the study. Medical records from 67 horses presenting for acute abdominal pain were evaluated to develop the colic assessment score. Twenty eight variables were compared between survivors and non-survivors and entered into logistic regression models for survival. Of these, six variables were included in the colic assessment score. A total colic assessment score range was from 0 to 12, with the highest score representing the lowest probability of survival. The optimal cutoff value to predict survival was seven resulting in an 86% sensitivity and 64% specificity with a positive predictive value of 88% and a negative predictive value of 57%. Data from 95 horses presenting for abdominal pain to two equine hospitals was then collected prospectively to validate the colic assessment score. Horses from the prospective portion of the study that received a score >7 were classified as predicted to die and those with a score ≤7 were predicted to survive. The classification was compared to the actual outcome, of which the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the colic assessment score were 84, 62, 88, and 52%, respectively.

摘要

马的急性腹痛是马匹医疗中常见的急症。病因种类繁多,使得预测存活率成为一项挑战。开展了一项回顾性、多机构临床研究,以确定与患绞痛马匹存活相关的临床参数,并利用这些参数建立绞痛存活评分系统。然后在研究的前瞻性部分使用临床数据对该评分系统进行验证。对67匹因急性腹痛就诊的马的病历进行评估,以制定绞痛评估评分。比较了存活者和非存活者之间的28个变量,并将其纳入存活的逻辑回归模型。其中,6个变量被纳入绞痛评估评分。绞痛评估总分范围为0至12分,分数越高表示存活概率越低。预测存活的最佳临界值为7分,敏感性为86%,特异性为64%,阳性预测值为88%,阴性预测值为57%。然后前瞻性收集了95匹到两家马匹医院因腹痛就诊的马的数据,以验证绞痛评估评分。研究前瞻性部分中得分>7分的马被归类为预测死亡,得分≤7分的马被预测存活。将该分类结果与实际结果进行比较,绞痛评估评分的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为84%、62%、88%和52%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d1/8531487/bb9904f8fda3/fvets-08-697589-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d1/8531487/2dc0716366b2/fvets-08-697589-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d1/8531487/bb9904f8fda3/fvets-08-697589-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d1/8531487/2dc0716366b2/fvets-08-697589-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d1/8531487/bb9904f8fda3/fvets-08-697589-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a Colic Scoring System to Predict Outcome in Horses.用于预测马匹结局的绞痛评分系统的开发。
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Oct 8;8:697589. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.697589. eCollection 2021.
2
Development of a colic severity score for predicting the outcome of equine colic.用于预测马属动物急腹症预后的急腹症严重程度评分系统的开发。
Vet Surg. 1995 Mar-Apr;24(2):97-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1995.tb01302.x.
3
[Evaluation of clinical examination parameters and a scoring system in equine colic as well as the assessment of their prognostic value].[马属动物急腹症临床检查参数及评分系统的评估及其预后价值的评定]
Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere. 2021 Oct;49(5):310-319. doi: 10.1055/a-1584-9150. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
4
Prognostic indicators in a Danish hospital-based population of colic horses.丹麦以医院为基础的患绞痛马匹群体的预后指标。
Equine Vet J Suppl. 2000 Jun(32):11-8. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2000.tb05328.x.
5
Evaluation of substance P as a biomarker for pain in equine colic.评价 P 物质作为马腹痛的生物标志物。
J Equine Vet Sci. 2024 Jan;132:104979. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104979. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
6
Monitoring acute equine visceral pain with the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Composite Pain Assessment (EQUUS-COMPASS) and the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Facial Assessment of Pain (EQUUS-FAP): A scale-construction study.使用马乌得勒支大学复合疼痛评估量表(EQUUS - COMPASS)和马乌得勒支大学面部疼痛评估量表(EQUUS - FAP)监测急性马内脏痛:一项量表构建研究。
Vet J. 2015 Dec;206(3):356-64. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.08.023. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
7
Development of a likelihood of survival scoring system for hospitalized equine neonates using generalized boosted regression modeling.使用广义增强回归模型开发住院马驹新生儿生存可能性评分系统。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 8;9(10):e109212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109212. eCollection 2014.
8
Reliability of using results of abdominal fluid analysis to determine treatment and predict lesion type and outcome for horses with colic: 218 cases (1991-1994).利用腹腔积液分析结果来确定马匹急腹症的治疗方案、预测病变类型及预后的可靠性:218例病例(1991 - 1994年)
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1998 Oct 1;213(7):1012-5.
9
Scoring System for Multiple Organ Dysfunction in Adult Horses with Acute Surgical Gastrointestinal Disease.成年马急性外科性胃肠疾病多器官功能障碍评分系统
J Vet Intern Med. 2016 Jul;30(4):1276-83. doi: 10.1111/jvim.14321. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
10
Serum amyloid A, haptoglobin, and ferritin in horses with colic: Association with common clinicopathological variables and short-term outcome.患急腹症马匹的血清淀粉样蛋白A、触珠蛋白和铁蛋白:与常见临床病理变量及短期预后的关联
Vet J. 2015 Jul;205(1):50-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.03.015. Epub 2015 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Alterations in the Peritoneal Fluid Proteome of Horses with Colic Attributed to Ischemic and Non-Ischemic Intestinal Disease.因缺血性和非缺血性肠道疾病导致腹痛的马匹腹膜液蛋白质组的变化
Animals (Basel). 2025 May 30;15(11):1604. doi: 10.3390/ani15111604.
2
Integration of machine learning and viscoelastic testing to improve survival prediction in horses experiencing acute abdominal pain at a veterinary teaching hospital.机器学习与粘弹性测试相结合以改善兽医教学医院急性腹痛马匹的生存预测
Equine Vet J. 2025 Apr 24. doi: 10.1111/evj.14517.
3
Extracted Plasma Cell-Free DNA Concentrations Are Elevated in Colic Patients with Systemic Inflammation.

本文引用的文献

1
Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Logistic regression.统计分析中的常见陷阱:逻辑回归
Perspect Clin Res. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):148-151. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_87_17.
2
Prognostic Value and Development of a Scoring System in Horses With Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome.全身炎症反应综合征马匹评分系统的预后价值及发展
J Vet Intern Med. 2017 Mar;31(2):582-592. doi: 10.1111/jvim.14670. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
3
Cognitive biases associated with medical decisions: a systematic review.与医疗决策相关的认知偏差:一项系统综述。
在患有全身炎症的绞痛患者中,提取的血浆游离DNA浓度升高。
Vet Sci. 2024 Sep 12;11(9):427. doi: 10.3390/vetsci11090427.
4
The prognostic importance of physiological and biochemical parameters in horses afflicted with colic.患有腹痛的马匹中生理和生化参数的预后重要性。
Open Vet J. 2024 Aug;14(8):1801-1807. doi: 10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i8.8. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
5
Long-Term Survival in 241 Cases of Intussusception in Cattle and Factors Associated with Mortality.241例牛肠套叠的长期存活情况及与死亡率相关的因素
Animals (Basel). 2024 Feb 21;14(5):676. doi: 10.3390/ani14050676.
6
Comparison of transrectal and transabdominal transducers for use in fast localized abdominal sonography of horses presenting with colic.用于患有绞痛马匹的快速局部腹部超声检查的经直肠和经腹探头的比较。
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Jan 4;10:1307938. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1307938. eCollection 2023.
7
Clinical predictive models in equine medicine: A systematic review.马医学中的临床预测模型:系统评价。
Equine Vet J. 2023 Jul;55(4):573-583. doi: 10.1111/evj.13880. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Nov 3;16(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0377-1.
4
Monitoring acute equine visceral pain with the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Composite Pain Assessment (EQUUS-COMPASS) and the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Facial Assessment of Pain (EQUUS-FAP): A scale-construction study.使用马乌得勒支大学复合疼痛评估量表(EQUUS - COMPASS)和马乌得勒支大学面部疼痛评估量表(EQUUS - FAP)监测急性马内脏痛:一项量表构建研究。
Vet J. 2015 Dec;206(3):356-64. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.08.023. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
5
Validation of two behaviour-based pain scales for horses with acute colic.验证两种基于行为的马匹急性腹痛疼痛量表。
Vet J. 2013 Sep;197(3):646-50. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
6
A behaviour-based pain scale for horses with acute colic: scale construction.基于行为的马急性腹痛疼痛评分量表:量表构建。
Vet J. 2013 Jun;196(3):394-401. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.10.008. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
7
Is there a statistical correlation between ultrasonographic findings and definitive diagnosis in horses with acute abdominal pain?患有急性腹痛的马匹的超声检查结果与最终诊断之间是否存在统计学相关性?
Equine Vet J Suppl. 2011 Aug(39):98-105. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00428.x.
8
Disorders of calcium and phosphate metabolism in horses.马的钙磷代谢紊乱
Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2011 Apr;27(1):129-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2010.12.010.
9
Visualizing and assessing discrimination in the logistic regression model.可视化和评估逻辑回归模型中的歧视。
Stat Med. 2010 Oct 30;29(24):2508-20. doi: 10.1002/sim.3994.
10
After-hours equine emergency admissions at a university referral hospital (1998-2007): causes and interventions.一所大学转诊医院的非工作时间马急诊入院情况(1998 - 2007年):病因与干预措施
J S Afr Vet Assoc. 2009 Sep;80(3):169-73. doi: 10.4102/jsava.v80i3.196.