• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索新型任务程序化与运动模拟之间的联系。

Exploring the Link between Novel Task Proceduralization and Motor Simulation.

作者信息

Palenciano Ana F, González-García Carlos, de Houwer Jan, Brass Marcel, Liefooghe Baptist

机构信息

Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium.

Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium.

出版信息

J Cogn. 2021 Sep 27;4(1):57. doi: 10.5334/joc.190. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.5334/joc.190
PMID:34693200
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8485871/
Abstract

Our ability to generate efficient behavior from novel instructions is critical for our adaptation to changing environments. Despite the absence of previous experience, novel instructed content is quickly encoded into an action-based or procedural format, facilitating automatic task processing. In the current work, we investigated the link between proceduralization and motor simulation, specifically, whether the covert activation of the task-relevant responses is used during the assembly of action-based instructions representations. Across three online experiments, we used a concurrent finger-tapping task to block motor simulation during the encoding of novel stimulus-response (S-R) associations. The overlap between the mappings and the motor task at the response level was manipulated. We predicted a greater impairment at mapping implementation in the overlapping condition, where the mappings' relevant response representations were already loaded by the motor demands, and thus, could not be used in the upcoming task simulation. This hypothesis was robustly supported by the three datasets. Nonetheless, the overlapping effect was not modulated by further manipulations of proceduralization-related variables (preparation demands in Exp.2, mapping novelty in Exp.3). Importantly, a fourth control experiment ruled out that our results were driven by alternative accounts as fatigue or negative priming. Overall, we provided strong evidence towards the involvement of motor simulation during anticipatory task reconfiguration. However, this involvement was rather general, and not restricted to novelty scenarios. Finally, these findings can be also integrated into broader models of anticipatory task control, stressing the role of the motor system during preparation.

摘要

我们根据新指令生成有效行为的能力对于我们适应不断变化的环境至关重要。尽管缺乏先前的经验,但新的指令内容会迅速被编码为基于动作或程序的格式,从而促进自动任务处理。在当前的研究中,我们调查了程序化与运动模拟之间的联系,具体而言,在基于动作的指令表征的组装过程中是否会使用与任务相关反应的隐蔽激活。在三项在线实验中,我们使用了一个并发的手指敲击任务来在新刺激-反应(S-R)关联的编码过程中阻断运动模拟。在反应水平上,操纵了映射与运动任务之间的重叠。我们预测,在重叠条件下映射实施会受到更大的损害,在这种情况下,映射的相关反应表征已经被运动需求所加载,因此无法用于即将到来的任务模拟。这一假设得到了三个数据集的有力支持。尽管如此,重叠效应并未因与程序化相关变量的进一步操纵(实验2中的准备需求,实验3中的映射新颖性)而受到调节。重要的是,第四个对照实验排除了我们的结果是由疲劳或负启动等其他因素驱动的可能性。总体而言,我们提供了有力证据表明运动模拟在预期任务重新配置过程中发挥了作用。然而,这种作用相当普遍,并不局限于新颖的情境。最后,这些发现也可以整合到更广泛的预期任务控制模型中,强调运动系统在准备过程中的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f30a/8485871/928f07a8b758/joc-4-1-190-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f30a/8485871/153fe487b4aa/joc-4-1-190-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f30a/8485871/51e24ad7cc04/joc-4-1-190-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f30a/8485871/8b10929fffde/joc-4-1-190-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f30a/8485871/6b738949b897/joc-4-1-190-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f30a/8485871/ae133dca4c0d/joc-4-1-190-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f30a/8485871/928f07a8b758/joc-4-1-190-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f30a/8485871/153fe487b4aa/joc-4-1-190-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f30a/8485871/51e24ad7cc04/joc-4-1-190-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f30a/8485871/8b10929fffde/joc-4-1-190-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f30a/8485871/6b738949b897/joc-4-1-190-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f30a/8485871/ae133dca4c0d/joc-4-1-190-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f30a/8485871/928f07a8b758/joc-4-1-190-g6.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the Link between Novel Task Proceduralization and Motor Simulation.探索新型任务程序化与运动模拟之间的联系。
J Cogn. 2021 Sep 27;4(1):57. doi: 10.5334/joc.190. eCollection 2021.
2
Concurrent response and action effect representations across the somatomotor cortices during novel task preparation.在新任务准备过程中,躯体感觉皮质中同时存在反应和动作效果的表示。
Cortex. 2024 Aug;177:150-169. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.05.003. Epub 2024 May 28.
3
The effects of declaratively maintaining and proactively proceduralizing novel stimulus-response mappings.陈述性维持和主动程序性新刺激-反应映射的效果。
Cognition. 2020 Aug;201:104295. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104295. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
4
[Inhibition and resource capacity during normal aging: a confrontation of the dorsal-ventral and frontal models in a modified version of negative priming].正常衰老过程中的抑制与资源容量:在负启动修正版中背腹侧模型与额叶模型的对比
Encephale. 2006 Mar-Apr;32(2 Pt 1):253-62. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(06)76152-8.
5
Neural oscillations track the maintenance and proceduralization of novel instructions.神经振荡跟踪新指令的维持和程序化。
Neuroimage. 2021 May 15;232:117870. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117870. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
6
On the Assimilation of Instructions: Stimulus-response Associations are Implemented but not Stimulus-task Associations.关于指令的同化:刺激-反应关联得以实现,但刺激-任务关联则不然。
J Cogn. 2019 Jul 31;2(1):20. doi: 10.5334/joc.78.
7
Benefits and costs of self-paced preparation of novel task instructions.自主制定新任务说明的益处与成本。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Oct 6;8(10):210762. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210762. eCollection 2021 Oct.
8
Attentional prioritization reconfigures novel instructions into action-oriented task sets.注意优先级将新指令重新配置为面向行动的任务集。
Cognition. 2020 Jan;194:104059. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104059. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
9
Characterising the declarative-procedural transformation in instruction-based learning.刻画基于指令学习中的陈述性-程序性转变。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Mar 28:17470218241238164. doi: 10.1177/17470218241238164.
10
The Role of Effector-Specific Task Representations in Voluntary Task Switching.效应器特定任务表征在自愿任务切换中的作用。
J Cogn. 2023 Jan 13;6(1):9. doi: 10.5334/joc.255. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Initial learning in the brain: From rules to action.大脑中的初始学习:从规则到行动。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Aug 20;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00274. eCollection 2024.
2
Instructing item-specific switch probability: expectations modulate stimulus-action priming.指导项目特异性转换概率:期望调节刺激-动作启动。
Psychol Res. 2022 Oct;86(7):2195-2214. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01641-z. Epub 2022 Jan 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Automatic effects of covert practice.内隐练习的自动效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Oct;74(10):1697-1708. doi: 10.1177/17470218211007138. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
2
Neural oscillations track the maintenance and proceduralization of novel instructions.神经振荡跟踪新指令的维持和程序化。
Neuroimage. 2021 May 15;232:117870. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117870. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
3
Frontoparietal action-oriented codes support novel instruction implementation.额顶面向动作的代码支持新指令的执行。
Neuroimage. 2021 Feb 1;226:117608. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117608. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
4
How Abstract (Non-embodied) Linguistic Representations Augment Cognitive Control.抽象(非具身)语言表征如何增强认知控制。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 15;11:1597. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01597. eCollection 2020.
5
The effects of declaratively maintaining and proactively proceduralizing novel stimulus-response mappings.陈述性维持和主动程序性新刺激-反应映射的效果。
Cognition. 2020 Aug;201:104295. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104295. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
6
Motor Imagery Practice and Cognitive Processes.运动想象练习与认知过程
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 3;11:394. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00394. eCollection 2020.
7
Attentional prioritization reconfigures novel instructions into action-oriented task sets.注意优先级将新指令重新配置为面向行动的任务集。
Cognition. 2020 Jan;194:104059. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104059. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
8
The role of language in novel task learning.语言在新任务学习中的作用。
Cognition. 2020 Jan;194:104036. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104036. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
9
Neural correlates of action: Comparing meta-analyses of imagery, observation, and execution.动作的神经关联:对表象、观察和执行的元分析进行比较。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Nov;94:31-44. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
10
Following new task instructions: Evidence for a dissociation between knowing and doing.遵循新的任务指令:知与行之间存在分离的证据。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Oct;81(Pt A):16-28. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.012.