Upton L G, Rajvanakarn M, Hayward J R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987 Mar;45(3):212-6. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(87)90117-0.
The fate of 52 nerves where there was altered sensation following sagittal ramus osteotomy and mandibular advancement, and 15 nerves where this occurred after third molar removal were evaluated through questionnaires involving both subjective and objective components. The study covered an interval between six and 54.5 months, with a mean of 31.9 months. Of the altered nerves from sagittal ramus osteotomy, 53.8% returned to normal, while 60% returned to normal in the third molar group. No correlation was found between terms used by the patient to describe the altered sensation and prognosis of nerve regeneration. In addition, correlation was not noted between the topographic distribution of altered sensation and the prognosis or residual deficit. No significant difference was found between the two methods of assessing nerve regeneration. A relationship was noted between age of the patient and increasing incidence of persistent altered sensation.
通过包含主观和客观成分的问卷,对矢状支截骨术和下颌前徙术后感觉改变的52条神经,以及第三磨牙拔除术后出现这种情况的15条神经的转归进行了评估。该研究涵盖了6至54.5个月的时间段,平均为31.9个月。矢状支截骨术导致感觉改变的神经中,53.8%恢复正常,而第三磨牙组中60%恢复正常。未发现患者用于描述感觉改变的术语与神经再生预后之间存在相关性。此外,感觉改变的地形分布与预后或残留缺损之间也未发现相关性。两种评估神经再生的方法之间未发现显著差异。注意到患者年龄与持续性感觉改变发生率增加之间存在关联。