Suppr超能文献

数字乳腺断层合成摄影术(DBT)联合合成二维乳腺 X 线摄影术(s2D)在乳腺癌筛查中与单纯数字乳腺 X 线摄影术(DM)相比,与更高的癌症检出率和更低的召回率相关:系统评价和荟萃分析的结果。

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) in breast cancer screening is associated with higher cancer detection and lower recalls compared to digital mammography (DM) alone: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

National Reference Centre Mammography Munich, Sonnenstraße 29, 80331, Munich, Germany.

, FFB gGmbH, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2022 Apr;32(4):2301-2312. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08308-8. Epub 2021 Oct 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus digital mammography (DM) in screening is problematic due to increased radiation by the double exposure. Synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) calculated from DBT datasets at no additional dose appears a sensible alternative compared to adding DM. This systematic review and meta-analysis focuses on screening performance outcomes in women screened with DBT plus s2D compared to DM alone.

METHODS

PubMed was searched from January 1, 2010, to September 2, 2020. Studies comparing DBT plus s2D to DM alone in breast cancer screening were included. Pooled risk ratios (RR) were estimated for cancer detection rates (CDR), recall rates, interval cancer rates (ICR), biopsy rates, and positive predictive values for recalls (PPV-1), for biopsies recommended (PPV-2), and for biopsies performed (PPV-3). Sensitivity analyses were performed using the leave-one-out approach. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 tool.

RESULTS

Twelve papers covering 414,281 women were included from 766 records identified. CDR is increased ([RR, 95% CI] 1.35, 1.20-1.52), recall rates are decreased (0.79, 0.64-0.98), and PPV-1 is increased (1.69, 1.45-1.96) when using DBT plus s2D compared to DM alone. ICR and biopsy rates did not differ, but PPV-2 respectively PPV-3 increased with DBT plus s2D (1.57, 1.08-2.28 respectively 1.36, 1.17-1.58). Overall RoB of studies was assessed to be low.

CONCLUSION

Results show improved diagnostic outcomes with DBT plus s2D compared to DM alone and underline the value of DBT in combination with s2D in breast cancer screening.

KEY POINTS

• DBT plus s2D is associated with higher CDR, lower recall rates, and a higher PPV-1 compared to DM alone in breast cancer screening. • No differences in biopsy rates were found between screening modalities, but PPV-2 and PPV-3 were higher in women screened with DBT plus s2D compared to DM alone. • We identified inconsistent results of ICR in two studies comparing DBT plus s2D to DM alone-resulting in no differences when pooling ICR in meta-analysis.

摘要

目的

由于双重曝光,数字乳腺断层合成术(DBT)加数字乳腺摄影术(DM)在筛查中存在问题。从 DBT 数据集中计算出的合成二维乳腺摄影术(s2D)在不增加剂量的情况下似乎是一种明智的替代方法,而不是增加 DM。本系统评价和荟萃分析重点关注与单独使用 DM 相比,在接受 DBT 加 s2D 筛查的女性中筛查性能的结果。

方法

从 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 9 月 2 日,在 PubMed 上进行了检索。纳入了比较乳腺癌筛查中 DBT 加 s2D 与单独使用 DM 的研究。对于癌症检出率(CDR)、召回率、间期癌率(ICR)、活检率以及推荐活检的阳性预测值 1(PPV-1)、推荐活检的阳性预测值 2(PPV-2)和进行活检的阳性预测值 3(PPV-3),计算了合并风险比(RR)。使用剔除一个研究的方法进行敏感性分析。使用诊断准确性研究的质量评估(QUADAS-2)工具评估偏倚风险(RoB)。

结果

从 766 条记录中确定了 12 篇涵盖 414281 名女性的论文。与单独使用 DM 相比,DBT 加 s2D 可增加 CDR([RR,95%CI] 1.35,1.20-1.52)、降低召回率(0.79,0.64-0.98)和增加 PPV-1(1.69,1.45-1.96)。ICR 和活检率没有差异,但 DBT 加 s2D 后 PPV-2 和 PPV-3 分别增加(1.57,1.08-2.28 分别为 1.36,1.17-1.58)。研究的整体 RoB 被评估为低。

结论

结果表明,与单独使用 DM 相比,DBT 加 s2D 可改善诊断结果,并强调了 DBT 在乳腺癌筛查中的组合应用在联合 s2D 时的价值。

关键点

• DBT 加 s2D 与单独使用 DM 相比,在乳腺癌筛查中可提高 CDR、降低召回率和增加 PPV-1。• 两种筛查方法的活检率没有差异,但 DBT 加 s2D 组的 PPV-2 和 PPV-3 高于单独使用 DM 组。• 我们发现,在两项比较 DBT 加 s2D 与单独使用 DM 的研究中,ICR 的结果不一致,因此在荟萃分析中合并 ICR 时没有差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c3/8921114/7e42c4e9889c/330_2021_8308_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验