• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在急诊科中,使用简单临床评分(SCS)和快速急诊医学评分(REMS)预测脓毒症患者的严重程度和死亡率的表现。

Performance of the Simple Clinical Score (SCS) and the Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) to predict severity level and mortality rate among patients with sepsis in the emergency department.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Rangsit University, Pathumthani, Thailand.

College of Digital Innovation and Information Technology, Rangsit University, Pathumthani, Thailand.

出版信息

Australas Emerg Care. 2022 Jun;25(2):121-125. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2021.09.002. Epub 2021 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.auec.2021.09.002
PMID:34696995
Abstract

Nurses play a key role as the first line of service for patients with medical conditions and injuries in the emergency department (ED), which includes assessing patients for sepsis. The researchers evaluated tools to examine the performance of the Simple Clinical Score (SCS) and the Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) to predict sepsis severity and mortality among sepsis patients in the ED. A retrospective survey was performed, selecting participants by using a purposive sampling method, and including the medical records of all patients diagnosed with sepsis admitted to the ED at Singburi Hospital, Thailand. Data were analysed using the ROC curve and the Area Under Curve (AUC) to calculate the accuracy of each patient's mortality prediction. A total of 225 patients diagnosed with sepsis was identified, with a mortality rate of 59.11% after admission to the medical service and intensive care unit. The AUC analysis showed that the accuracy of the model generated from the REMS (88.6%) was higher than that of the SCS (76.7%). The authors also recommend that key variables identified in this research should be used to develop screening and assessment tools for sepsis in the context of the ED.

摘要

护士在急诊科(ED)中扮演着重要的角色,是为有医疗状况和受伤的患者提供服务的第一线人员,其中包括评估患者是否患有败血症。研究人员评估了用于检查简单临床评分(SCS)和快速急诊医学评分(REMS)在 ED 中预测败血症患者严重程度和死亡率的性能的工具。采用目的抽样法进行回顾性调查,选择参与者,并纳入所有在泰国 Singburi 医院急诊科被诊断为败血症的患者的病历。使用 ROC 曲线和曲线下面积(AUC)分析来计算每个患者死亡率预测的准确性。共确定了 225 名被诊断为败血症的患者,他们在入住医疗服务和重症监护病房后的死亡率为 59.11%。AUC 分析显示,REMS 生成的模型的准确性(88.6%)高于 SCS(76.7%)。作者还建议,应根据 ED 的情况,使用本研究中确定的关键变量来开发败血症的筛查和评估工具。

相似文献

1
Performance of the Simple Clinical Score (SCS) and the Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) to predict severity level and mortality rate among patients with sepsis in the emergency department.在急诊科中,使用简单临床评分(SCS)和快速急诊医学评分(REMS)预测脓毒症患者的严重程度和死亡率的表现。
Australas Emerg Care. 2022 Jun;25(2):121-125. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2021.09.002. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
2
The utility of the rapid emergency medicine score (REMS) compared with SIRS, qSOFA and NEWS for Predicting in-hospital Mortality among Patients with suspicion of Sepsis in an emergency department.快速急诊医学评分(REMS)与 SIRS、qSOFA 和 NEWS 相比,在预测急诊科疑似脓毒症患者住院死亡率方面的效用。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00396-x.
3
Predictive accuracy and feasibility of risk stratification scores for 28-day mortality of patients with sepsis in an emergency department.急诊科脓毒症患者28天死亡率风险分层评分的预测准确性及可行性
Eur J Emerg Med. 2015 Oct;22(5):331-7. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000185.
4
Internal validation and comparison of the prognostic performance of models based on six emergency scoring systems to predict in-hospital mortality in the emergency department.基于 6 种急诊评分系统的模型对急诊科住院病死率预测的预后性能的内部验证和比较。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Jun 10;21(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00459-7.
5
Sepsis patients in the emergency department: stratification using the Clinical Impression Score, Predisposition, Infection, Response and Organ dysfunction score or quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score?急诊科脓毒症患者:使用临床印象评分、易感性、感染、反应和器官功能障碍评分或快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分进行分层?
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;25(5):328-334. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000460.
6
The comparison of modified early warning score with rapid emergency medicine score: a prospective multicentre observational cohort study on medical and surgical patients presenting to emergency department.改良早期预警评分与快速急诊医学评分的比较:一项针对就诊于急诊科的内科和外科患者的前瞻性多中心观察性队列研究。
Emerg Med J. 2014 Jun;31(6):476-81. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202444. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
7
Performance Assessment of the Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis Score, Modified Early Warning Score, Rapid Emergency Medicine Score, and Rapid Acute Physiology Score in Predicting Survival Outcomes of Adult Renal Abscess Patients in the Emergency Department.在急诊科预测成人肾脓肿患者生存结局方面,对死亡率在急诊科脓毒症评分、改良早期预警评分、快速急诊医学评分和快速急性生理学评分的评估。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Sep 19;2018:6983568. doi: 10.1155/2018/6983568. eCollection 2018.
8
Assessment of disease-severity scoring systems for patients with sepsis in general internal medicine departments.评估普通内科病房脓毒症患者的疾病严重程度评分系统。
Crit Care. 2011;15(2):R95. doi: 10.1186/cc10102. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
9
[Comparison of national early warning score, rapid emergency medicine score and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score for predicting outcome among emergency severe patients].[比较国家早期预警评分、快速急诊医学评分和急性生理与慢性健康状况评估II评分对急诊重症患者预后的预测作用]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017 Dec;29(12):1092-1096. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.12.008.
10
Comparison of the Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis Score, Modified Early Warning Score, Rapid Emergency Medicine Score and Rapid Acute Physiology Score for predicting the outcomes of adult splenic abscess patients in the emergency department.比较急诊科脓毒症评分、改良早期预警评分、快速急诊医学评分和快速急性生理学评分对预测成人脾脓肿患者在急诊科治疗结局的死亡率。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 1;12(11):e0187495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187495. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Construction and application of emergency critical care patient care plan based on Delphi method.基于德尔菲法的急诊重症患者护理计划的构建与应用
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 15;104(33):e42752. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042752.
2
Predictive Value of the Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) for Non-trauma Geriatric Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department: A Prospective Observational Study.快速急诊医学评分(REMS)对急诊科非创伤性老年患者的预测价值:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Cureus. 2025 May 10;17(5):e83853. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83853. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Predictive ability of the REMS and HOTEL scoring systems for mortality in geriatric patients with pulmonary embolism.
REMS和HOTEL评分系统对老年肺栓塞患者死亡率的预测能力。
Egypt Heart J. 2024 Aug 9;76(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s43044-024-00531-0.
4
Unveiling the performance of the prehospital Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (pREMS): How the predictive score impacts in-hospital outcomes in traumatic brain injury (TBI): A retrospective observational cohort study.揭示院前快速急诊医学评分(pREMS)的表现:预测评分如何影响创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的院内结局:一项回顾性观察队列研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Aug 2;24(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01063-1.
5
The value of the INFECTIONS scoring system in identifying bacterial infections among patients presenting at the emergency department of a middle-income country: A pilot study.INFECTIONS 评分系统在识别中低收入国家急诊科就诊患者细菌感染中的价值:一项试点研究。
Chin J Traumatol. 2024 Mar;27(2):77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2023.09.001. Epub 2023 Sep 4.