• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 2012 年固城化学物质泄漏灾难后主要烧伤标准的氟化氢暴露患者的比较分析。

Comparative Analysis of Hydrogen Fluoride-Exposed Patients Based on Major Burn Criteria After the 2012 Gumi City Chemical Leak Disaster.

机构信息

Environmental Health Center, Soonchunhyang University Gumi Hospital, Gumi, Republic of Korea and Department of Emergency Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.

Environmental Health Center, Soonchunhyang University Gumi Hospital, Gumi, Republic of Korea and Department of Emergency Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Burn Care Res. 2022 Jul 1;43(4):834-840. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irab206.

DOI:10.1093/jbcr/irab206
PMID:34698345
Abstract

This study conducted to analyze and compare the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of hydrogen fluoride-exposed patients based on major burn criteria for the appropriate emergency department (ED) response to a mass casualty chemical spill. This retrospective cross-sectional study included the records of patients (n = 199) who visited the ED of Gumi City University Hospital from September 27, 2012, to October 20, 2012. Subjects were included in the major burn group (MBG) if they presented with wounds that required referral to a burn center according to the American Burn Association guidelines or in the nonmajor burn group (NMBG) if not. Males were predominant in both the MBG (n = 55, 48 males) and NMBG (n = 144, 84 males; P < .05). The most prevalent timeline for visiting the ED was the phase which included 9-32 hours post-leak of hydrogen fluoride, including 45 patients (81.8%) in the MBG and 122 patients (84.7%) in the NMBG (P < .001). The respiratory tract was the site of greatest damage in patients in both the MBG and NMBG (n = 47, 85.5% vs n = 142, 98.6%, P < .001). Regarding dispositions, all patients in the NMBG were discharged (n = 144, 100%); however, eight patients (14.5%) in the MBG underwent other dispositions (discharge against medical advice, five patients; admission, one patient; death, two patients, P < .05). Patient outcomes after major chemical contamination events should be characterized in future studies to maximize the quality of patient care.

摘要

本研究旨在根据主要烧伤标准分析和比较氢氟酸暴露患者的流行病学和临床特征,以便为大规模化学事故伤患者提供适当的急诊(ED)反应。这是一项回顾性的横断面研究,纳入了 2012 年 9 月 27 日至 10 月 20 日期间到古米市大学医院 ED 就诊的 199 名患者的记录。如果患者的伤口根据美国烧伤协会指南需要转诊到烧伤中心,则将其纳入主要烧伤组(MBG);否则,将其纳入非主要烧伤组(NMBG)。在 MBG(n = 55,48 名男性)和 NMBG(n = 144,84 名男性)中,男性均占优势(P <.05)。就诊 ED 的最常见时间是氢氟酸泄漏后 9-32 小时,包括 MBG 中的 45 名患者(81.8%)和 NMBG 中的 122 名患者(84.7%)(P <.001)。呼吸道是 MBG 和 NMBG 中患者损伤最严重的部位(n = 47,85.5% vs n = 142,98.6%,P <.001)。关于处理结果,NMBG 中的所有患者均出院(n = 144,100%);然而,MBG 中有 8 名患者(14.5%)接受了其他处理(出院后无医嘱、5 例;入院、1 例;死亡、2 例,P <.05)。在未来的研究中,应描述重大化学污染事件后的患者结局,以最大限度地提高患者护理质量。

相似文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Hydrogen Fluoride-Exposed Patients Based on Major Burn Criteria After the 2012 Gumi City Chemical Leak Disaster.基于 2012 年固城化学物质泄漏灾难后主要烧伤标准的氟化氢暴露患者的比较分析。
J Burn Care Res. 2022 Jul 1;43(4):834-840. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irab206.
2
Lessons learned from reviewing a hospital's disaster response to the hydrofluoric acid leak in Gumi city in 2012.从审查医院应对 2012 年固济市氢氟酸泄漏灾难的经验中吸取的教训。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Mar 22;21(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00427-1.
3
Beyond surge: Coping with mass burn casualty in the closest hospital to the Formosa Fun Coast Dust Explosion.超越激增:应对福岛海滨爆炸事故中离爆炸地点最近的医院的大批烧伤伤员。
Burns. 2019 Jun;45(4):964-973. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.12.003. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
4
The role of preliminary hospitals in the management of a mass burn casualty disaster.基层医院在大规模烧伤伤员灾难管理中的作用。
Burns. 2018 Jun;44(4):800-806. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
5
Complex chemical burns following a mass casualty chemical plant incident: how optimal planning and organisation can make a difference.重大突发化学工厂事故后的复杂化学烧伤:优化规划和组织如何产生影响。
Burns. 2012 Aug;38(5):713-8. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.12.010. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
6
Response of a local hospital to a burn disaster: Contributory factors leading to zero mortality outcomes.当地一家医院对烧伤灾难的应对:实现零死亡结果的促成因素。
Burns. 2018 Aug;44(5):1083-1090. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 May 9.
7
[Analysis on clinical characteristics of 316 patients with hydrofluoric acid burns].316例氢氟酸烧伤患者临床特征分析
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2018 May 20;34(5):271-276. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.05.004.
8
Developing and implementing a plan for large-scale burn disaster response in New Jersey.制定并实施新泽西州大规模烧伤灾难应对计划。
J Burn Care Res. 2014 Jan-Feb;35(1):e14-20. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182779b59.
9
Management of the Formosa Color Dust Explosion: Lessons Learned from the Treatment of 49 Mass Burn Casualty Patients at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.台湾彩色粉尘爆炸事件的处理:长庚纪念医院救治49名大规模烧伤伤员的经验教训
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jun;137(6):1900-1908. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002148.
10
Cost Analysis of 48 Burn Patients in a Mass Casualty Explosion Treated at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.长庚纪念医院收治的48例大规模伤亡爆炸烧伤患者的成本分析。
Injury. 2017 Jan;48(1):80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Highly sensitive work function type room temperature gas sensor based on Ti doped hBN monolayer for sensing CO, CO, HS, HF and NO. A DFT study.基于Ti掺杂hBN单层的用于检测CO、CO、HS、HF和NO的高灵敏度功函数型室温气体传感器。一项密度泛函理论研究。 需注意,原文中“CO, CO”表述重复有误,可能影响准确理解,但按要求严格翻译如上。
RSC Adv. 2022 Nov 30;12(53):34185-34199. doi: 10.1039/d2ra06307g. eCollection 2022 Nov 29.