School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Wound Repair Regen. 2022 Jan;30(1):24-33. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12978. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
Australia has the second highest rate of non-traumatic lower extremity amputation (LEA) globally. Australia's large geographical size is one of the biggest challenges facing limb preservation services and may be contributing to LEA. The aim of this study was to determine what factors contribute to the likelihood of LEA in people with active foot ulceration in regional Australia. This retrospective cohort study audited patients with active foot ulceration in a multidisciplinary high risk foot service (HRFS) in regional Australia. Neurological, vascular and wound characteristics were systematically extracted, along with demographic information. Participants were followed for at least 12 months until healing or LEA occurred. Correlations between LEA and clinical and demographic characteristics were assessed using the Pearson's product moment correlation coefficient and chi squared test for independence. Significant variables (p < 0.05) were included in the model. Direct logistic regression assessed the independent contribution of significantly correlated variables on the likelihood of LEA. Of note, 1876 records were hand screened with 476 participants (25%) meeting the inclusion criteria. Geographical distance from the HRFS, toe systolic pressure (TSP), diabetes and infection were all significantly correlated with LEA and included in the logistic regression model. TSP decrease of 1 mmHg (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03), increased geographical distance (1 km) from HRFS (OR 1.006, 95% CI 1.001-1.01) infection (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.06-4.07) and presence of diabetes (OR 3.77, 95% CI 1.12-12.65) were all significantly associated with increased likelihood of LEA. HRFS should account for the disparity in outcomes between patients living in close proximity to their service, compared to those in rural areas. Optimal management of diabetes, vascular perfusion and control of infection may also contribute to preventing LEA in people with active foot ulceration.
澳大利亚的下肢非创伤性截肢(LEA)发生率居全球第二。澳大利亚地域辽阔,这是保肢服务面临的最大挑战之一,可能也是导致 LEA 的原因之一。本研究旨在确定在澳大利亚地区患有活动性足部溃疡的人群中,哪些因素会导致 LEA。这项回顾性队列研究对澳大利亚地区一家多学科高危足部服务(HRFS)中患有活动性足部溃疡的患者进行了审核。系统地提取了神经、血管和伤口特征,以及人口统计学信息。对参与者进行了至少 12 个月的随访,直至愈合或发生 LEA。使用 Pearson 积矩相关系数和卡方检验评估 LEA 与临床和人口统计学特征之间的相关性。将有显著意义的变量(p<0.05)纳入模型。直接逻辑回归评估显著相关变量对 LEA 可能性的独立贡献。值得注意的是,手工筛查了 1876 份记录,其中 476 名参与者(25%)符合纳入标准。与 LEA 显著相关的变量包括 HRFS 的地理距离、足趾收缩压(TSP)、糖尿病和感染,均纳入逻辑回归模型。TSP 降低 1mmHg(OR 1.02,95%CI 1.01-1.03),HRFS 距离增加 1 公里(OR 1.006,95%CI 1.001-1.01)、感染(OR 2.08,95%CI 1.06-4.07)和糖尿病(OR 3.77,95%CI 1.12-12.65)均与 LEA 发生的可能性增加显著相关。HRFS 应考虑到居住在服务附近的患者与居住在农村地区的患者之间的结果差异。优化糖尿病、血管灌注和感染控制的管理也可能有助于预防活动性足部溃疡患者的 LEA。