University College London, London, United Kingdom (M.S., A.E., M.P., L.R.S., P.M., K.C., D.A.I., C.J.D., M.R.E.).
University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom (C.G.).
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Dec;174(12):1647-1657. doi: 10.7326/M21-2078. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
B-cell depletion with rituximab is commonly used for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) that is refractory to conventional therapy, but it yields variable responses. We hypothesized that high B-cell activating factor (BAFF) levels after rituximab can cause disease flares, thereby limiting its effectiveness.
To obtain preliminary evidence for efficacy of the anti-BAFF therapeutic belimumab after rituximab in SLE.
Phase 2, randomized, double-blind (patients, assessors, researchers, care providers), placebo-controlled, parallel-group, superiority trial. (ISRCTN: 47873003).
England.
Fifty-two patients who had SLE that was refractory to conventional treatment and whose physicians had recommended rituximab therapy were recruited between 2 February 2017 and 28 March 2019.
Participants were treated with rituximab and 4 to 8 weeks later were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous belimumab or placebo for 52 weeks.
The prespecified primary end point was serum IgG anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibody levels at 52 weeks. Secondary outcomes included incidence of disease flares and adverse events.
At 52 weeks, IgG anti-dsDNA antibody levels were lower in patients treated with belimumab compared with placebo (geometric mean, 47 [95% CI, 25 to 88] vs. 103 [CI, 49 to 213] IU/mL; 70% greater reduction from baseline [CI, 46% to 84%]; < 0.001). Belimumab reduced risk for severe flare (BILAG-2004 grade A) compared with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.27 [CI, 0.07 to 0.98]; log-rank = 0.033), with 10 severe flares in the placebo group and 3 in the belimumab group. Belimumab did not increase incidence of serious adverse events. Belimumab significantly suppressed B-cell repopulation compared with placebo (geometric mean, 0.012 [CI, 0.006 to 0.014] vs. 0.037 [CI, 0.021 to 0.081] × 10/L) at 52 weeks in a subset of patients ( = 25) with available data.
Small sample size; biomarker primary end point.
Belimumab after rituximab significantly reduced serum IgG anti-dsDNA antibody levels and reduced risk for severe flare in patients with SLE that was refractory to conventional therapy. The results suggest that this combination could be developed as a therapeutic strategy.
Versus Arthritis.
利妥昔单抗诱导的 B 细胞耗竭常用于治疗对常规治疗无效的系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者,但疗效不一。我们假设利妥昔单抗治疗后 B 细胞激活因子(BAFF)水平升高可能导致疾病发作,从而限制其疗效。
初步评估抗 BAFF 治疗药物贝利尤单抗在利妥昔单抗治疗 SLE 中的疗效。
这是一项 2 期、随机、双盲(患者、评估者、研究者、医护人员)、安慰剂对照、平行组、优效性试验。(ISRCTN: 47873003)。
英国。
52 例对常规治疗无效且医生建议使用利妥昔单抗治疗的 SLE 患者于 2017 年 2 月 2 日至 2019 年 3 月 28 日期间入选。
患者接受利妥昔单抗治疗,4 至 8 周后随机(1:1)接受静脉注射贝利尤单抗或安慰剂治疗 52 周。
预先设定的主要终点是 52 周时血清 IgG 抗双链 DNA(抗 dsDNA)抗体水平。次要结局包括疾病发作和不良事件的发生率。
52 周时,贝利尤单抗治疗组患者的 IgG 抗 dsDNA 抗体水平低于安慰剂组(几何均数,47[95%CI,25 至 88]与 103[CI,49 至 213]IU/ml;基线降低 70%[CI,46%至 84%];<0.001)。与安慰剂相比,贝利尤单抗降低了严重发作(BILAG-2004 分级 A)的风险(风险比,0.27[CI,0.07 至 0.98];对数秩 = 0.033),安慰剂组发生 10 例严重发作,贝利尤单抗组发生 3 例。贝利尤单抗未增加严重不良事件的发生率。与安慰剂相比,在具有可用数据的(n=25)患者亚组中,贝利尤单抗在 52 周时显著抑制 B 细胞再增殖(几何均数,0.012[CI,0.006 至 0.014]与 0.037[CI,0.021 至 0.081]×10/L)(= 25)。
样本量小;生物标志物主要终点。
利妥昔单抗后贝利尤单抗可显著降低常规治疗无效的 SLE 患者的血清 IgG 抗 dsDNA 抗体水平,并降低严重发作的风险。结果提示,该联合治疗可能成为一种治疗策略。
英国关节炎协会。