• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦汞合金修复体的修复治疗模式及使用寿命

Restorative treatment pattern and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark.

作者信息

Qvist V, Thylstrup A, Mjör I A

出版信息

Acta Odontol Scand. 1986 Dec;44(6):343-9. doi: 10.3109/00016358609094344.

DOI:10.3109/00016358609094344
PMID:3469862
Abstract

A survey has been made of the reasons for placement and replacement of 6052 amalgam restorations in Denmark. In patients more than 16 years of age 48% of all restorations were made because of primary caries, and 52% were replacements of failed restorations. In primary teeth 64% and in permanent teeth of children 83% of the restorations were made because of primary caries. The reasons for replacement of restorations were dependent on dentition, age of the patient, and type of restoration. Secondary caries was the most frequent reason for replacement of failed restorations in permanent teeth, comprising a third of all replacements. Marginal discrepancies and bulk fracture of fillings were the other two major reasons. In primary teeth fracture and loss of fillings were the two major reasons for replacement of amalgam restorations, whereas secondary caries caused less than a quarter of all restorations to be replaced. The age of the restorations replaced ranged from 0 to 38 years, and half of the restorations replaced in permanent teeth of adults were less than 7 years old. A shorter longevity of failed restorations was noted in primary teeth and permanent teeth of children.

摘要

一项针对丹麦6052颗汞合金修复体的放置和更换原因进行了调查。在16岁以上的患者中,所有修复体中有48%是因原发龋而进行的,52%是对失败修复体的更换。在乳牙中,64%的修复体是因原发龋而进行的;在儿童恒牙中,这一比例为83%。修复体更换的原因取决于牙列、患者年龄和修复体类型。继发龋是恒牙中失败修复体更换的最常见原因,占所有更换情况的三分之一。充填体边缘不密合和大块折断是另外两个主要原因。在乳牙中,充填体折断和脱落是汞合金修复体更换的两个主要原因,而继发龋导致更换的修复体不到所有修复体的四分之一。被更换修复体的使用年限为0至38年,在成人恒牙中被更换的修复体有一半使用年限不到7年。在乳牙和儿童恒牙中,失败修复体的使用年限较短。

相似文献

1
Restorative treatment pattern and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark.丹麦汞合金修复体的修复治疗模式及使用寿命
Acta Odontol Scand. 1986 Dec;44(6):343-9. doi: 10.3109/00016358609094344.
2
Placement and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark.
Acta Odontol Scand. 1990 Oct;48(5):297-303. doi: 10.3109/00016359009033620.
3
Restorative treatment pattern and longevity of resin restorations in Denmark.丹麦树脂修复体的修复治疗模式与使用寿命
Acta Odontol Scand. 1986 Dec;44(6):351-6. doi: 10.3109/00016358609094345.
4
Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark.
Acta Odontol Scand. 1990 Oct;48(5):305-11. doi: 10.3109/00016359009033621.
5
Replacements of restorations in the primary and young permanent dentition.乳牙和年轻恒牙修复体的替换
Swed Dent J. 1998;22(4):149-55.
6
Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Germany.
Oper Dent. 1994 Nov-Dec;19(6):228-32.
7
Placement and replacement of restorations in primary teeth.乳牙修复体的放置与更换。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2002 Jan;60(1):25-8. doi: 10.1080/000163502753471961.
8
The post-amalgam era: a selection of materials and their longevity in the primary and young permanent dentitions.汞合金修复后的时代:乳牙和年轻恒牙中材料的选择及其使用寿命
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2003 May;13(3):158-64. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-263x.2003.00453.x.
9
Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results.乳牙日常常规玻璃离子体和汞合金修复体的寿命及防龋效果:三年结果
J Dent Res. 1997 Jul;76(7):1387-96. doi: 10.1177/00220345970760070901.
10
Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.用于治疗乳牙龋齿的补牙材料。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15(2):CD004483. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004483.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of the Adhesive Properties of Two Generations of Dentin Bonding Agents by Checking the Microleakage in the Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study.通过检查乳牙微渗漏对两代牙本质粘结剂粘结性能的比较评价:一项体外研究
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011 Sep-Dec;4(3):195-202. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1109. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
2
A Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Etching by the Total Etch and Self-etch Dentin Bonding Systems in the Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Jan-Apr;8(1):30-6. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1279. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
3
A comparison of the resin tag penetration of the total etch and the self-etch dentin bonding systems in the primary teeth: An in vitro study.乳牙中全酸蚀和自酸蚀牙本质粘结系统的树脂突渗透比较:一项体外研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2012 Apr;3(2):158-63. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.96818.
4
Composites associated with pulp-protection material: color-stability analysis after accelerated artificial aging.与牙髓保护材料相关的复合材料:加速人工老化后的颜色稳定性分析
Eur J Dent. 2010 Jan;4(1):6-11.
5
Durability of amalgam in the restoration of class II cavities in primary molars: a systematic review of the literature.银汞合金用于乳牙Ⅱ类洞修复的耐久性:文献系统评价
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2007 Mar;8(1):5-13. doi: 10.1007/BF03262564.
6
[Dental fillings in school-children from the Alcalá la Real-Martos Health District (Jaén)].[阿尔卡拉拉雷亚尔 - 马托斯健康区(哈恩省)学童的牙科补牙情况]
Aten Primaria. 2002 Nov 15;30(8):496-500. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(02)79086-0.
7
What type of filling? Best practice in dental restorations.哪种补牙材料?牙齿修复的最佳实践。
Qual Health Care. 1999 Sep;8(3):202-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.3.202.