Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, P.O. Box 3500, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan.
Musculoskeletal and Sports Medicine, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, P.O. Box 3500, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan.
Arch Osteoporos. 2021 Oct 26;16(1):158. doi: 10.1007/s11657-021-01032-2.
The International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) formulated a set of best practice framework as an international benchmark for secondary fracture prevention (SFP) and fracture liaison services (FLS), delineating essential elements of service delivery. The aim of this audit was to assess compliance with the IOF standards for patients ≥ 50 years presenting with fragility hip fractures at a tertiary care center in Pakistan.
A retrospective sample of hip fracture cases from Jan 2019 to Dec 2019, treated at the section of Orthopedic Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, was conducted. After excluding high energy trauma cases and patients younger than 50 years of age, medical records were audited, using a pre-structured Performa based on IOF standards. Compliance level of 0, 1, 2, and 3 was recorded as defined by IOF. Microsoft excel was used for data analysis.
A compliance level of 3 was recorded for patient identification and fall prevention services, whereas level 1 was attained for database maintenance for 25 (100%) cases. For medication initiation, level 0 was recorded for all the cases; however, 8 (32%) cases were prescribed calcium and vitamin D supplements. For the standards, including post-fracture assessment timing, evaluation of secondary causes of osteoporosis, multifaceted assessment, medication review, communication strategy, and long-term management, a level 0 was noted for 25 (100%) cases. Moreover, no recommended assessment guidelines were followed uniformly.
The care gaps identified require substantial efforts to ensure adequate implementation of the overall best practice standards for SFP, necessitating the need for FLS initiation and establishment of fracture care pathway.
国际骨质疏松基金会(IOF)制定了一套最佳实践框架,作为二级骨折预防(SFP)和骨折联络服务(FLS)的国际基准,划定了服务提供的基本要素。本次审计旨在评估巴基斯坦一家三级护理中心≥50 岁脆性髋部骨折患者符合 IOF 标准的情况。
对 2019 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月在卡拉奇 Aga Khan 大学骨科外科治疗的髋部骨折病例进行回顾性抽样。排除高能量创伤病例和年龄小于 50 岁的患者后,使用基于 IOF 标准的预构表格对病历进行审核。根据 IOF 的定义,记录符合 0、1、2 和 3 级的合规水平。使用 Microsoft excel 进行数据分析。
患者识别和跌倒预防服务的合规水平为 3 级,而数据库维护的合规水平为 1 级,25 例(100%)病例符合要求。所有病例均未开始药物治疗,记录为 0 级;然而,8 例(32%)患者开了钙和维生素 D 补充剂。对于骨折后评估时机、骨质疏松继发原因评估、多方面评估、药物审查、沟通策略和长期管理等标准,25 例(100%)病例的记录为 0 级。此外,没有统一遵循任何推荐的评估指南。
需要付出巨大努力来弥补这些护理差距,以确保充分实施 SFP 的总体最佳实践标准,这需要启动 FLS 并建立骨折护理途径。