Cohen Matthew L, Harnish Stacy M, Lanzi Alyssa M, Brello Jennifer, Victorson David, Kisala Pamela A, Nandakumar Ratna, Tulsky David S
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Delaware, Newark.
Center for Health Assessment Research and Translation, University of Delaware, Newark.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Nov 8;64(11):4403-4412. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00071. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
Background Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures produce scores that do not always have obvious clinical meaning. The PRO-bookmarking procedure is a new and promising way to make PRO measures more meaningful and interpretable. However, the materials and procedures of the task may benefit from adaptations to be more accessible to individuals with cognitive and language disorders. Aims This study aims to provide an overview of the iterative refinement process used to modify the materials and procedures of the PRO-bookmarking task so that they are more accessible to adults with acquired cognitive and language impairments. Method and Procedures Our team of health psychologists, neuropsychologists, and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) conducted two focus groups with SLPs and care partners of people with aphasia using the same PRO-bookmarking materials and procedures as previous reports. These PRO-bookmarking materials and procedures were then refined iteratively based on discussion with those who participated in focus groups and among the research team, and three more times in the course of 16 additional focus groups of different stakeholders: people with Parkinson's disease, aphasia, or traumatic brain injury; care partners of people with those conditions; and SLPs who have experience with those, and other adult-acquired conditions. Outcomes and Results The PRO-bookmarking materials and procedures underwent four iterations to make them clearer, simpler, and more accessible. For example, the materials included more structured text and graphic supports where appropriate and the procedures were clustered into smaller discrete tasks and displayed graphically when possible and appropriate. Conclusions PRO-bookmarking materials and procedures were made simpler and more structured to increase their accessibility to adults with cognitive and language impairments. In fact, these adaptations made the tasks simpler and clearer for all types of stakeholders.
背景 患者报告结局(PRO)测量产生的分数并不总是具有明显的临床意义。PRO 书签程序是一种使 PRO 测量更有意义和可解释的新的且有前景的方法。然而,该任务的材料和程序可能需要进行调整,以便认知和语言障碍患者更容易理解。
目的 本研究旨在概述用于修改 PRO 书签任务的材料和程序的迭代优化过程,以使获得性认知和语言障碍的成年人更容易理解。
方法和程序 我们的健康心理学家、神经心理学家和言语语言病理学家(SLP)团队与 SLP 以及失语症患者的护理伙伴进行了两个焦点小组讨论,使用与之前报告相同的 PRO 书签材料和程序。然后,基于与参与焦点小组的人员以及研究团队的讨论,对这些 PRO 书签材料和程序进行了迭代优化,并且在另外 16 个不同利益相关者的焦点小组过程中又进行了三次优化,这些利益相关者包括:帕金森病、失语症或创伤性脑损伤患者;患有这些疾病的人的护理伙伴;以及有这些疾病和其他成人获得性疾病经验的 SLP。
结果 对 PRO 书签材料和程序进行了四次迭代,使其更清晰、更简单且更易于理解。例如,材料在适当的地方包括了更结构化的文本和图形支持,并且程序被聚类为更小的离散任务,并在可能且合适的情况下以图形方式显示。
结论 对 PRO 书签材料和程序进行了简化和结构化,以提高其对认知和语言障碍成年人的可及性。事实上,这些调整使所有类型的利益相关者都能更简单、更清晰地完成任务。