Johann Pascal D, Wuchter Patrick, Trojanova Lenka, Sturm Dominik, Lu Kevin Hai-Ning, Kulozik Andreas E, Kunz Joachim B
Hopp Children's Cancer Center (KiTZ).
Swabian Childrens' Cancer Center, University Childrens' Hospital Augsburg and EU-RHAB Registry, Augsburg.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2022 Oct 1;44(7):e968-e975. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000002349. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
Granulocyte transfusions have long been used to bridge the time to neutrophil recovery in patients with neutropenia and severe infection. Recent randomized controlled trials did not prove a beneficial effect of granulocyte transfusions, but were likely underpowered and suffered from very heterogeneous study populations.
We retrospectively reviewed data of all patients treated with granulocyte transfusions at our pediatric center from 2004 to 2019. To identify parameters that predict the success of granulocyte transfusions, we stratified patients in 3 groups. Patients in group 1 cleared their infection, whereas patients in group 2 succumbed to an infection in neutropenia despite granulocyte transfusions. A third group included all patients who died of causes that were not related to infection.
We demonstrate that patients without respiratory or cardiocirculatory insufficiency are enriched in group 1 and more likely to benefit from granulocyte transfusions than patients who already require these intensive care measures. The effect of granulocyte transfusions correlates with the cell dose per body weight applied per time. With our standard twice weekly dosing, patients with a body weight below 40 kg are more likely to achieve a sufficient leukocyte increment and clear their infection in comparison to patients with a higher body weight.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that future studies on the benefits of granulocyte transfusions stratify patients according to clinical risk factors that include the need for respiratory or cardiocirculatory support and strive for a sufficient dose density of granulocyte transfusions.
长期以来,粒细胞输注一直被用于帮助中性粒细胞减少症和严重感染患者度过中性粒细胞恢复的时间。近期的随机对照试验并未证明粒细胞输注有有益效果,但这些试验可能效力不足,且研究人群差异很大。
我们回顾性分析了2004年至2019年在我们儿科中心接受粒细胞输注治疗的所有患者的数据。为了确定预测粒细胞输注成功的参数,我们将患者分为3组。第1组患者感染得到清除,而第2组患者尽管接受了粒细胞输注,但在中性粒细胞减少期仍死于感染。第三组包括所有因与感染无关的原因死亡的患者。
我们证明,与已经需要这些重症监护措施的患者相比,第1组中没有呼吸或心肺循环功能不全的患者更多,且更有可能从粒细胞输注中获益。粒细胞输注的效果与每次应用的每体重细胞剂量相关。按照我们标准的每周两次给药方案,与体重较高的患者相比,体重低于40千克的患者更有可能实现足够的白细胞增加并清除感染。
讨论/结论:我们建议,未来关于粒细胞输注益处的研究应根据临床风险因素对患者进行分层,这些因素包括是否需要呼吸或心肺循环支持,并努力实现足够的粒细胞输注剂量密度。