• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

安置稳定性:不同类型的家庭寄养在其中扮演了什么角色?

Placement stability: What role do the different types of family foster care play?

机构信息

Centre de recherche universitaire sur les jeunes et les familles, 2915, avenue du Bourg-Royal, Québec, Québec G1C 3S2, Canada.

Département de psychologie, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (UQTR), 3351, boul. des Forges, C.P. 500, Trois-Rivières, Québec G9A 5H7, Canada.

出版信息

Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Aug;130(Pt 3):105359. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105359. Epub 2021 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105359
PMID:34702575
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Placement stability is a major concern after a child enters foster care. Several studies have focused on the different factors associated with the risk of moving the child. However, the role and effect of the type of family foster care is less clear.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to identify the characteristics of children and their biological mothers, which are associated with initial type of care (non-relative foster care (NRFC), kinship foster care (KFC) and foster-to-adopt family (FAF)), and to examine the association between the type of care and placement stability.

METHODS

Case files of 361 Canadian children aged <12 years (X = 4.64; SD = 3.75) were reviewed during the window period of five years after their first out-of-home placement (NRFC n = 156; KC n = 155; FAF n = 50).

RESULTS

Our results show that children in FAF and KFC are initially placed at a younger age than children in the NRFC group. They also indicate that children placed in NRFC have a more significant accumulation of problems than the other two groups (FAF and KFC). Also, boys are placed in NRFC more often than girls, who are more frequently placed in FAF. Multivariate analysis revealed that children placed in FAF are less likely to face a high number of movements, even after controlling for the child's age, gender, and cumulative problems.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the role of foster care type at entry into foster care. It supports clinical discussion for an optimal response for neglected and maltreated children, as well as better services for foster parents, according to their specific needs.

摘要

背景

儿童进入寄养家庭后,安置稳定性是一个主要关注点。已有多项研究聚焦于与儿童转移风险相关的各种因素。然而,家庭寄养类型的作用和影响尚不清楚。

目的

本研究旨在确定与儿童及其生母初始照料类型(非亲属寄养(NRFC)、亲属寄养(KFC)和寄养-收养家庭(FAF))相关的特征,并检验照料类型与安置稳定性之间的关联。

方法

对 361 名年龄<12 岁的加拿大儿童(X=4.64;SD=3.75)的案例档案进行回顾,这些儿童在首次离家安置后的五年窗口期内(NRFC 组 n=156;KFC 组 n=155;FAF 组 n=50)。

结果

我们的研究结果表明,FAF 和 KFC 中的儿童最初的安置年龄比 NRFC 组的儿童小。研究结果还表明,与其他两组(FAF 和 KFC)相比,NRFC 组的儿童问题积累更为显著。此外,男孩比女孩更常被安置在 NRFC 中,而女孩则更常被安置在 FAF 中。多变量分析表明,即使在控制了儿童的年龄、性别和累积问题后,FAF 中安置的儿童面临多次转移的可能性更小。

结论

本研究强调了进入寄养家庭时寄养类型的作用。它支持了根据儿童的具体需求,为被忽视和受虐待的儿童提供最佳应对方案以及为寄养父母提供更好服务的临床讨论。

相似文献

1
Placement stability: What role do the different types of family foster care play?安置稳定性:不同类型的家庭寄养在其中扮演了什么角色?
Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Aug;130(Pt 3):105359. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105359. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
2
Kinship care for the safety, permanency, and well-being of children removed from the home for maltreatment.亲属抚养是为了那些因遭受虐待而被带离家庭的儿童的安全、永久性安置和福祉。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21(1):CD006546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006546.pub2.
3
Permanency and Safety Among Children in Foster Family and Kinship Care: A Scoping Review.寄养和亲属照顾中的儿童的永久性和安全性:范围综述。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2017 Jul;18(3):268-286. doi: 10.1177/1524838015611673. Epub 2015 Oct 11.
4
The outcome of children placed in a welfare center or foster care before the age of 4: Prognostic factors.4 岁前被安置在福利院或寄养家庭的儿童的结果:预后因素。
Arch Pediatr. 2022 Oct;29(7):484-489. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2022.08.013. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
5
Factors associated with reunification and placement move for children placed in kinship care under the age of thirteen.与 13 岁以下安置在亲属照料中的儿童的 reunification 和 placement move 相关的因素。
Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Aug;130(Pt 3):105357. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105357. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
6
Impact of kinship care on behavioral well-being for children in out-of-home care.亲属照料对家庭外照料儿童行为福祉的影响。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 Jun;162(6):550-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.162.6.550. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
7
Health status and type of out-of-home placement: informal kinship care in an investigated sample.健康状况与家庭外安置类型:被调查样本中的非正式亲属照料
Acad Pediatr. 2014 Nov-Dec;14(6):559-64. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
8
Placement Stability, Cumulative Time in Care, and Permanency: Using Administrative Data from CPS to Track Placement Trajectories.安置稳定性、累计照料时间和永久性:利用 CPS 的行政数据跟踪安置轨迹。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 17;14(11):1405. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111405.
9
Children and youth in out-of-home care: What can predict an initial change in placement?离开家庭照顾的儿童和青少年:哪些因素可以预测最初的安置变化?
Child Abuse Negl. 2019 Jul;93:55-65. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 May 4.
10
Examining Foster Care Outcomes for American Indian Children in the Context of the Indian Child Welfare Act.审视印第安人福利法案背景下美国印第安儿童的寄养照顾结果。
Child Maltreat. 2023 Aug;28(3):527-538. doi: 10.1177/10775595231175649. Epub 2023 May 12.