• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术和开放手术修复术的生存率。

The survival rate among endovascular and open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

作者信息

Abdel Rahim Ahmed, Ibrahim Rashid, Yao Lu, Khalf Ahmed, Ismail Mohammed

机构信息

Plymouth University Hospital NHS Trust, United Kingdom.

Aswan University Hospitals, Egypt.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Oct 5;71:102913. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102913. eCollection 2021 Nov.

DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102913
PMID:34703583
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8524105/
Abstract

A best evidence topic has been constructed using a described protocol. The three-part question addressed was: In patients with Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), Does endovascular abdominal aortic repair (EVAR), AS compared to open surgical repair (OSR), has higher Survival rates? The outcomes assessed were the overall survival rates in both techniques. The best evidence showed that there is no statistically significant difference between EVAR and OSR in survival rates.

摘要

一个最佳证据主题已按照所描述的方案构建。所涉及的三部分问题是：在肾下腹主动脉瘤（AAA）患者中，与开放手术修复（OSR）相比，血管内腹主动脉修复（EVAR）的生存率是否更高？评估的结果是两种技术的总体生存率。最佳证据表明，EVAR和OSR在生存率方面没有统计学上的显著差异。

相似文献

1
The survival rate among endovascular and open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术和开放手术修复术的生存率。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Oct 5;71:102913. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102913. eCollection 2021 Nov.
2
Re-intervention rate in endovascular vs open surgical repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms.腹主动脉瘤血管内修复与开放手术修复的再干预率。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Aug 10;69:102703. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102703. eCollection 2021 Sep.
3
Incidence of secondary rupture after abdominal aortic aneurysms (endovascular vs. open surgical repair).腹主动脉瘤（血管腔内修复术与开放手术修复）后二次破裂的发生率。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Sep 9;70:102831. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102831. eCollection 2021 Oct.
4
Comparison of Outcomes in Elective Endovascular Aortic Repair vs Open Surgical Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.择期血管内主动脉修复术与开放手术修复腹主动脉瘤的结局比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e196578. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6578.
5
Meta-analysis of phase-specific survival after elective endovascular versus surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm from randomized controlled trials and propensity score-matched studies.择期血管内与手术修复腹主动脉瘤的随机对照试验和倾向评分匹配研究的特定阶段生存的荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Oct;72(4):1464-1472.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.03.041. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
6
Inferior Mid-term Durability with Comparable Survival for Younger Patients Undergoing Elective Endovascular Infrarenal versus Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.对于接受选择性血管腔内肾下型与开放性腹主动脉瘤修复术的年轻患者，中期耐久性较差，但生存率相当。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Apr;64:143-150.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.10.039. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
7
Long-term survival following successful abdominal aortic aneurysm repair evaluated using Australian administrative data.利用澳大利亚行政数据评估成功的腹主动脉瘤修复后的长期生存情况。
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Mar;90(3):339-344. doi: 10.1111/ans.15598. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
8
Effect of Endovascular Treatment Rate on Population Level Outcomes and Survival After Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.血管内治疗率对完整腹主动脉瘤修复后人群水平结局和生存的影响。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Nov;58(5):698-707. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.04.027. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
9
Long-term survival after endovascular and open repair in patients with anatomy outside instructions for use criteria for endovascular aneurysm repair.不符合血管内动脉瘤修复使用说明标准的患者行血管内和开放修复后的长期生存。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Dec;70(6):1823-1830. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.081. Epub 2019 May 21.
10
Endovascular and open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: A comparative analysis of western and Chinese studies.血管内和开放手术修复腹主动脉瘤：西方和中国研究的比较分析。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Mar 30;21(1):75-92. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm.2020.01.513.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the Short and Long-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Repair and Open Surgical Repair in the Treatment of Unruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.血管内修复与开放手术修复治疗未破裂腹主动脉瘤的短期和长期结果比较：荟萃分析与系统评价
Cureus. 2020 Aug 12;12(8):e9683. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9683.
2
Open versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.腹主动脉瘤的开放修复与血管内修复。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 30;380(22):2126-2135. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1715955.
3
Long-term survival and secondary procedures after open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.腹主动脉瘤开放修复或血管腔内修复后的长期生存情况及二次手术
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Nov;66(5):1379-1389. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.05.122.
4
Short-term and long-term results of endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in Germany.德国腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术和开放修复术的短期及长期结果
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Dec;66(6):1704-1711.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.040. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
5
Ten-Year Single-Center Results of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Treatment: Endovascular versus Open Repair.腹主动脉瘤治疗的十年单中心结果：血管内修复与开放修复对比
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Oct;44:113-118. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 May 22.
6
Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years' follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): a randomised controlled trial.英国血管内动脉瘤修复试验 1（EVAR 试验 1）15 年随访的血管内与开放修复腹主动脉瘤的比较：一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2016 Nov 12;388(10058):2366-2374. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31135-7. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
7
Comparison of outcomes after endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in low-risk patients.低危患者腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术与开放修复术的结局比较。
Br J Surg. 2016 Jul;103(8):989-94. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10139. Epub 2016 May 3.
8
Outcome after open and endovascular repairs of abdominal aortic aneurysms in matched cohorts using propensity score modeling.使用倾向评分模型对匹配队列中腹主动脉瘤进行开放修复和血管内修复后的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Aug;62(2):304-11.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.02.039. Epub 2015 May 2.
9
Towards evidence-based medicine in surgical practice: best BETs.迈向外科实践中的循证医学：最佳最佳证据。
Int J Surg. 2011;9(8):585-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.08.001. Epub 2011 Aug 9.