School of Economics & Management, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(13):18891-18904. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16882-z. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
This research examines how financial transformative power sector reforms affect energy efficiency and the economy in a sample of economies from South Asia, the Middle East, and Europe. We applied two stages of OLS, Bayesian VAR, and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) methods to a panel data set from 1995 to 2018. According to empirical findings, institutional deficiency has a negative effect on electricity reforms, implying that the greater the impact of reforms on electricity performance, the higher the institutional efficiency, A collection of reform initiatives involving a variety of reform agencies will boost energy efficiency by up to 13% and per capita electricity access by 62%. Despite recent reforms and regulatory measures, the electricity sector continues to face challenges in terms of private investment and structural flaws such as energy inefficiency, significant technological and financial losses, low power quality, and outdated transmission and network infrastructure. Interestingly 13.2% increases can be found in energy efficiency after electricity reforms. Unlike previous studies, our findings reveal a conflict between the broader economic effects and the welfare impact on electricity consumers.
本研究考察了金融转型力量部门改革如何影响南亚、中东和欧洲经济体样本中的能源效率和经济。我们应用了两阶段 OLS、贝叶斯 VAR 和数据包络分析 (DEA) 方法,对 1995 年至 2018 年的面板数据集进行了分析。根据实证结果,制度缺陷对电力改革有负面影响,这意味着改革对电力绩效的影响越大,制度效率越高。一系列涉及各种改革机构的改革举措将使能源效率提高 13%,人均电力接入提高 62%。尽管最近进行了改革和监管措施,但电力部门在私人投资和结构性缺陷方面仍然面临挑战,例如能源效率低下、重大技术和财务损失、低电力质量以及过时的传输和网络基础设施。有趣的是,电力改革后能源效率提高了 13.2%。与以往的研究不同,我们的研究结果揭示了更广泛的经济影响与电力消费者福利影响之间的冲突。