Dietz Elizabeth
The School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Int J Transgend Health. 2021 Oct 26;22(1-2):191-202. doi: 10.1080/26895269.2020.1834483. eCollection 2021.
Some trans people want to create families in a variety of ways that include pregnancy, but often face obstacles in doing so.
This paper explores how trans pregnancy is treated as exceptional and out of the ordinary by reproductive institutions.
Analysis of case studies demonstrates the ubiquity of institutional obstacles to trans pregnancy and how reproductive institutions unnecessarily render trans pregnancy exceptional.
Reproductive institutions shape the kinds of people for whom achieving pregnancy is made easier, and often fail to imagine the possibility of trans parents. This failure of imagination is not rooted in biological fact, but rather in social logics that ought to be the site for transformations that expand access and shift provider attitudes.
Trans parents are unexceptional in the sense that, even though they may experience relatively more concentrated forms of adversity, they share many reproductive capabilities and obstacles with cis parents. In light of that concentrated adversity and the epistemic insights it might generate, how might prospective trans parents engage with new reproductive technologies? How might these engagements render them moral pioneers called to make decisions about the sorts of people created using reproductive biotechnologies?
一些跨性别者希望通过包括怀孕在内的多种方式组建家庭,但往往在这样做时面临障碍。
本文探讨生殖机构如何将跨性别者怀孕视为特殊且不寻常的情况。
对案例研究的分析表明,跨性别者怀孕面临机构性障碍的普遍性,以及生殖机构如何不必要地使跨性别者怀孕显得特殊。
生殖机构塑造了那些更容易实现怀孕的人群类型,并且常常无法想象跨性别者成为父母的可能性。这种想象力的缺失并非源于生物学事实,而是源于社会逻辑,而社会逻辑应该成为变革的场所,以扩大获取途径并改变提供者的态度。
跨性别者成为父母并非特殊情况,因为尽管他们可能经历相对更集中的逆境形式,但他们与顺性别父母有许多相同的生殖能力和障碍。鉴于这种集中的逆境以及它可能产生的认知见解,未来的跨性别者父母如何与新的生殖技术互动?这些互动如何使他们成为道德先驱,被要求就使用生殖生物技术创造的人群类型做出决策?