Department of Ultrasound, Medical Imaging Center, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Department of Ultrasound, Yancheng First Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School (The First People's Hospital of Yancheng), Yancheng, China.
J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Jul;41(7):1753-1761. doi: 10.1002/jum.15858. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
To explore the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) combined with the Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (C-TIRADS) for differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules.
A retrospective analysis of the conventional ultrasound and CEUS data of 388 nodules in 355 patients who had undergone thyroid nodule resection was conducted. All nodules had clear pathological results. The CEUS observation indexes included the enhancement degree in the arterial phase (no enhancement, scant punctate-linear enhancement, mild enhancement, moderate enhancement, and high enhancement) and wash-out patterns (rapid wash-out, slow wash-out, and isochronous wash-out). Chi-square test between groups and receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were used to determine the malignant (+1 point) and benign (-1 point) observation indexes that were statistically significant for the differentiation between benign and malignant thyroid nodules. The CEUS and C-TIRADS malignant and benign indexes were combined to score and draw the ROC curve, which was compared with the ROC curve scored by C-TIRADS alone to compare the diagnostic efficacy of the two methods for differentiating between benign and malignant thyroid nodules.
Among the CEUS observation indexes, mild enhancement and rapid wash-out were malignant indexes, while isochronous wash-out was a benign index. The best diagnostic cut-off value for the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules using the C-TIRADS score and the C-TIRADS and CEUS combined score (C-TIRADS + CEUS score) was 2. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV) of the two methods were 79.97, 75.48, 82.9, 70.5%, and 89.7, 72.9, 83.3, 82.5%, respectively. The area under the curve values were 0.840 and 0.877 (P < .001), respectively.
The CEUS feature of mild enhancement in the arterial phase and rapid wash-out pattern are suggestive of malignancy and isochronous wash-out pattern is suggestive of benignity. The C-TIRADS + CEUS score has a higher value for distinguishing benign from malignant thyroid nodules than the C-TIRADS score alone.
探讨超声造影(CEUS)联合中国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(C-TIRADS)对甲状腺良恶性结节的诊断价值。
回顾性分析 355 例甲状腺结节切除术患者的 388 个结节的常规超声和 CEUS 资料,所有结节均有明确的病理结果。CEUS 观察指标包括动脉期增强程度(无增强、稀疏点状-线状增强、轻度增强、中度增强、高度增强)和洗脱模式(快进快出、慢进慢出、等时洗脱)。采用卡方检验对组间差异进行比较,应用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)确定对甲状腺良恶性结节有统计学意义的良、恶性观察指标(良性+1 分,恶性-1 分)。将 CEUS 和 C-TIRADS 的良、恶性指标进行联合评分,并绘制 ROC 曲线,与单独使用 C-TIRADS 评分绘制的 ROC 曲线进行比较,比较两种方法对甲状腺良恶性结节的诊断效能。
在 CEUS 观察指标中,轻度增强和快进快出是恶性指标,而等时洗脱是良性指标。使用 C-TIRADS 评分和 C-TIRADS 联合 CEUS 评分(C-TIRADS+CEUS 评分)对甲状腺良恶性结节进行区分的最佳诊断截断值为 2。两种方法的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为 79.97%、75.48%、82.9%、70.5%和 89.7%、72.9%、83.3%、82.5%,曲线下面积分别为 0.840 和 0.877(P<0.001)。
动脉期轻度增强和快进快出洗脱模式提示恶性,等时洗脱模式提示良性。与单独使用 C-TIRADS 评分相比,C-TIRADS+CEUS 评分对鉴别甲状腺良恶性结节具有更高的价值。