Diagnostic value of liquid-based cytology test in intrathoracic lymph nodes and lung lesions sampled by endobronchial ultrasonography-transbronchial needle aspiration.

BACKGROUNDS

Liquid-based cytology (LBC) has begun to be used in non-gynecological samples such as endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). This study aims to investigate the diagnostic value of LBC in intrathoracic lymph nodes and lung lesions sampled with EBUS-TBNA.

METHODS

In total, 174 cases that underwent EBUS-TBNA between July 2020 and February 2021 were included (75 and 99 cases were prepared using conventional and LBC methods, respectively). The two groups were compared in terms of diagnostic categories, number of slides, cell blocks, slides per location, locations sampled, immunohistochemical studies, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

The percentages of malignant, suspicious for malignancy, benign, and non-diagnostic (ND) cases were 51.8%, 1.1%, 39.6%, and 7.5%, respectively. The LBC and conventional group (CG) had similar rates in the diagnostic categories, except for ND (3.0% and 13.3%, respectively). The sensitivity of LBC and CG were 90.4% and 85.7%, respectively. There were no differences in the specificity and diagnostic accuracy between groups. There was a statistically significant difference between groups in terms of the number of slides, number of slides per location, number of cell blocks, and locations sampled (p < .001, p < .001, p < .05, p < .05).

CONCLUSION

The LBC technique can be used for samples taken with EBUS-TBNA. Rapid fixation and the absence of artificial problems greatly reduce the rate of ND samples in LBC slides. Other important advantages are a lower number of slides to examine and a greater number of cell blocks.