Bruggeman Laurence, Millasseau Julien, Yuen Ivan, Demuth Katherine
The MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
ARC Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Dec 13;64(12):4631-4648. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00311. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
Children with hearing loss (HL), including those with hearing aids (HAs) and cochlear implants (CIs), often have difficulties contrasting words like " " versus " " and " " versus " " due to challenges producing systematic voicing contrasts. Even when acoustic contrasts are present, these may not be perceived as such by others. This can cause miscommunication, leading to poor self-esteem and social isolation. Acoustic evidence is therefore needed to determine if these children have established distinct voicing categories before entering school and if misperceptions are due to a lack of phonological representations or due to a still-maturing implementation system. The findings should help inform more effective early intervention.
Participants included 14 children with HL (eight HA users, five CI users, and one bimodal) and 20 with normal hearing, all English-speaking preschoolers. In an elicited imitation task, they produced consonant-vowel-consonant minimal pair words that contrasted voicing in word-initial (onset) or word-final (coda) position at all three places of articulation (PoAs).
Overall, children with HL showed acoustically distinct voicing categories for both onsets and codas at all three PoAs. Contrasts were less systematic for codas than for onsets, as also confirmed by adults' perceptual ratings.
Preschoolers with HL produce acoustic differences for voiced versus voiceless onsets and codas, indicating distinct phonological representations for both. Nonetheless, codas were less accurately perceived by adult raters, especially when produced by CI users. This suggests a protracted development of the phonetic implementation of codas, where CI users, in particular, may benefit from targeted intervention.
听力损失(HL)儿童,包括佩戴助听器(HA)和人工耳蜗(CI)的儿童,由于在产生系统的浊音对比方面存在困难,往往难以区分诸如“ ”与“ ”以及“ ”与“ ”这样的单词。即使存在声学对比,其他人可能也无法将其识别出来。这可能导致沟通不畅,进而导致自尊心低落和社交孤立。因此,需要声学证据来确定这些儿童在入学前是否已建立起不同的浊音类别,以及误解是由于缺乏音系表征还是由于实施系统仍在发育成熟。这些发现应有助于为更有效的早期干预提供信息。
参与者包括14名HL儿童(8名HA使用者、5名CI使用者和1名双模使用者)以及20名听力正常的儿童,均为说英语的学龄前儿童。在一个诱发模仿任务中,他们产出了辅音-元音-辅音最小对单词,这些单词在所有三个发音部位(PoA)的词首(起首)或词尾(韵尾)位置形成浊音对比。
总体而言,HL儿童在所有三个PoA的起首和韵尾处都表现出了声学上不同的浊音类别。韵尾的对比不如起首的对比系统,这也得到了成人感知评分的证实。
患有HL的学龄前儿童在浊音与清音的起首和韵尾处产生了声学差异,表明两者都有不同的音系表征。尽管如此,成人评分者对韵尾的感知不太准确,尤其是由CI使用者产出时。这表明韵尾的语音实施发展较为缓慢,特别是CI使用者可能会从有针对性的干预中受益。