College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Department of Medical Oncology, Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Br J Cancer. 2022 Jan;126(1):42-47. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01606-4. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used concomitant to cancer treatment and they induce gut microbiota changes. It is increasingly apparent that gut dysbiosis can reduce the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). However, little is known about PPI effects on outcomes with ICIs, particularly in combination, ICI approaches. METHODS: Post hoc, Cox proportional hazard analysis of phase III trial, IMpower150 was conducted to assess the association between PPI use and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in chemotherapy-naive, metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer participants randomised atezolizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel (ACP), bevacizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel (BCP), or atezolizumab plus BCP (ABCP). PPI use was defined as any PPI administration between 30 days prior and 30 days after treatment initiation. RESULTS: Of 1202 participants, 441 (37%) received a PPI. PPI use was independently associated with worse OS (n = 748; hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 1.53 [1.21-1.95], P < 0.001) and PFS (1.34 [1.12-1.61], P = 0.002) in the pooled atezolizumab arms (ACP plus ABCP). This association was not apparent for BCP (n = 368; OS 1.01 [0.73-1.39], P = 0.969; PFS 0.97 [0.76-1.25], P = 0.827). The observed OS treatment effect (HR 95% CI) of the atezolizumab (ACP plus ABCP) arms vs BCP was 1.03 (0.77-1.36) for PPI users compared to 0.68 (0.54-0.86) for non-users (P [interaction] = 0.028). A similar association was noted for ABCP vs BCP (PPI users 0.96 [0.68-1.35]; PPI non-users 0.66 [0.50-0.87]; P [interaction] = 0.095). CONCLUSIONS: PPI use was a negative prognostic marker in patients treated with ACP or ABCP, but not BCP. The analysis suggests that PPIs negatively influence the magnitude of ICI efficacy.
背景:质子泵抑制剂 (PPI) 常用于癌症治疗的同时使用,它们会引起肠道微生物群的变化。越来越明显的是,肠道菌群失调会降低免疫检查点抑制剂 (ICI) 的疗效。然而,人们对 PPI 对 ICI 结果的影响知之甚少,尤其是在联合使用 ICI 方法时。
方法:对 III 期试验 IMpower150 进行事后 Cox 比例风险分析,以评估化疗初治转移性非鳞状非小细胞肺癌患者中 PPI 使用与总生存期 (OS) 和无进展生存期 (PFS) 之间的关联,这些患者随机接受阿替利珠单抗联合卡铂加紫杉醇 (ACP)、贝伐珠单抗联合卡铂加紫杉醇 (BCP) 或阿替利珠单抗联合 BCP (ABCP) 治疗。PPI 使用的定义为治疗开始前 30 天至治疗开始后 30 天之间的任何 PPI 给药。
结果:在 1202 名参与者中,441 名 (37%) 使用了 PPI。在 pooled atezolizumab 臂 (ACP 加 ABCP) 中,PPI 使用与更差的 OS (n = 748; 风险比 (HR) [95%置信区间 (CI)] = 1.53 [1.21-1.95], P < 0.001) 和 PFS (1.34 [1.12-1.61], P = 0.002) 独立相关。对于 BCP (n = 368; OS 1.01 [0.73-1.39], P = 0.969; PFS 0.97 [0.76-1.25], P = 0.827),这种关联并不明显。在接受阿替利珠单抗 (ACP 加 ABCP) 治疗的患者中,与 BCP 相比,PPI 使用患者的观察到的 OS 治疗效果 (HR 95% CI) 为 1.03 (0.77-1.36),而非使用者为 0.68 (0.54-0.86) (P [交互] = 0.028)。在 ABCP 与 BCP 之间也观察到类似的关联 (PPI 使用患者 0.96 [0.68-1.35]; PPI 非使用者 0.66 [0.50-0.87]; P [交互] = 0.095)。
结论:在接受 ACP 或 ABCP 治疗的患者中,PPI 使用是一个负面的预后标志物,但在接受 BCP 治疗的患者中则不是。该分析表明,PPI 会对 ICI 的疗效产生负面影响。
N Engl J Med. 2018-6-4
Clin Cancer Res. 2020-10-15
Oncologist. 2025-2-6
Clin Cancer Res. 2020-10-15
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020-9
Front Oncol. 2020-8-6