Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
PD Biometrics, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Ann Oncol. 2020 Apr;31(4):525-531. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.01.006. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
Preclinical data have shown that proton pump inhibitors (PPI) can modulate the microbiome, and single-arm studies suggested that antibiotics (ATB) may decrease the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), but randomized controlled trial data are lacking. This pooled analysis evaluated the effect of ATB and PPI on outcome in patients randomized between ICI and chemotherapy.
This retrospective analysis used pooled data from the phase II POPLAR (NCT01903993) and phase III OAK (NCT02008227) trials, which included 1512 patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) randomly assigned to receive atezolizumab (n = 757) or docetaxel (n = 755). The main objective of this analysis was to assess the impact of ATB and PPI use on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
A total of 169 (22.3%) patients in the atezolizumab group and 202 (26.8%) in the docetaxel group received ATB, and 234 (30.9%) and 260 (34.4%), respectively, received PPI. Multivariate analysis in all patients revealed that ATB were associated with shorter OS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.39], as was PPI (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.10-1.44). Within the atezolizumab population, OS was significantly shorter in patients who received ATB (8.5 versus 14.1 months, HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.06-1.63, P = 0.01) or PPI (9.6 versus 14.5 months, HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.20-1.75, P = 0.0001). PPI use was associated with shorter PFS in the atezolizumab population (1.9 versus 2.8 months, HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.10-1.53, P = 0.001). There was no association between ATB and PPI use and PFS or OS within the docetaxel population.
In this unplanned analysis from two randomized trials, data suggest that ATB or PPI use in patients with metastatic NSCLC is associated with poor outcome and may influence the efficacy of ICI.
临床前数据表明质子泵抑制剂(PPI)可以调节微生物组,单臂研究表明抗生素(ATB)可能降低免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的疗效,但缺乏随机对照试验数据。这项汇总分析评估了 ATB 和 PPI 对接受 ICI 和化疗随机分组的患者结局的影响。
这是一项使用 II 期 POPLAR(NCT01903993)和 III 期 OAK(NCT02008227)试验的汇总数据进行的回顾性分析,包括 1512 例先前治疗的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者,随机分配接受阿特珠单抗(n=757)或多西他赛(n=755)治疗。该分析的主要目的是评估 ATB 和 PPI 应用对总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的影响。
在阿特珠单抗组中,共有 169 例(22.3%)患者和在多西他赛组中 202 例(26.8%)患者接受了 ATB,分别有 234 例(30.9%)和 260 例(34.4%)患者接受了 PPI。所有患者的多变量分析显示,ATB 与较短的 OS 相关[风险比(HR)1.20,95%置信区间(CI)1.04-1.39],PPI 也是如此(HR 1.26,95% CI 1.10-1.44)。在阿特珠单抗人群中,接受 ATB 治疗的患者 OS 显著缩短(8.5 个月与 14.1 个月,HR 1.32,95% CI 1.06-1.63,P=0.01)或 PPI(9.6 个月与 14.5 个月,HR 1.45,95% CI 1.20-1.75,P=0.0001)。在阿特珠单抗人群中,PPI 与较短的 PFS 相关(1.9 个月与 2.8 个月,HR 1.30,95% CI 1.10-1.53,P=0.001)。在多西他赛人群中,ATB 和 PPI 与 PFS 或 OS 之间无关联。
在这两项随机试验的一项未计划的分析中,数据表明转移性 NSCLC 患者使用 ATB 或 PPI 与不良结局相关,可能影响 ICI 的疗效。