• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国黑人与拉丁裔父母/照顾者参与儿童数字健康肥胖干预措施的系统评价

Black American and Latinx Parent/Caregiver Participation in Digital Health Obesity Interventions for Children: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Sanchez-Flack Jennifer, Buscemi Joanna, O'Donnell Alexander, Clark Withington Margaret H, Fitzgibbon Marian

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.

University of Illinois Cancer Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.

出版信息

Front Digit Health. 2021 Jun 15;3:687648. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.687648. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2021.687648
PMID:34713158
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8522024/
Abstract

Parents/caregivers are consistently described as integral targets given their influential role in supporting and managing behaviors such as diet and physical activity. Identifying effective obesity prevention interventions to enhance and sustain parent participation is needed. Digital obesity prevention interventions are a promising strategy to improve parent/caregiver participation. Digital health interventions demonstrate acceptable participation and retention among parents/caregivers. However, our understanding of digital obesity prevention interventions targeting Black American and Latinx parents/caregivers is limited. This systematic review aims to identify Black American and Latinx parents'/caregivers' level of participation in digital obesity prevention and treatment interventions and determine the relationship between parent/caregiver participation and behavioral and weight status outcomes. This review adheres to PRISMA guidelines and is registered in PROSPERO. Eligibility criteria include: intervention delivered by digital technology, targeted Black American and Latinx parents/caregivers of young children (2-12 years), reported parent/caregiver participation outcomes, targeted diet or physical activity behaviors, and randomized controlled trial study design. Searches were conducted in September 2020 in ERIC, PsychInfo, PubMed, and Web of Science. Initial searches returned 499 results. Four reviewers screened records against eligibility criteria and 12 studies met inclusion criteria. Across all studies, parent/caregiver participation ranged from low to high. Only half of the included studies reported significant improvements in behavioral or weight status outcomes for parents/caregivers and/or children. Of these studies, three reported high parental/caregiver participation rates, and three reported high satisfaction rates. These findings suggest that participation and satisfaction may impact behavior change and weight status. The small number of studies indicates that additional research is needed to determine whether engagement or other factors predict responsiveness to the digital health intervention. Our results lay the groundwork for developing and testing future digital health interventions with the explicit goal of parental/caregiver participation and considers the need to expand our digital health intervention research methodologies to address obesity inequities among diverse families better.

摘要

父母/照顾者一直被视为重要目标,因为他们在支持和管理饮食及体育活动等行为方面发挥着重要作用。需要确定有效的肥胖预防干预措施,以提高并维持父母的参与度。数字肥胖预防干预措施是提高父母/照顾者参与度的一项有前景的策略。数字健康干预措施在父母/照顾者中显示出可接受的参与度和留存率。然而,我们对针对美国黑人及拉丁裔父母/照顾者的数字肥胖预防干预措施的了解有限。本系统评价旨在确定美国黑人及拉丁裔父母/照顾者参与数字肥胖预防和治疗干预措施的程度,并确定父母/照顾者参与度与行为及体重状况结果之间的关系。本评价遵循PRISMA指南,并已在PROSPERO注册。纳入标准包括:通过数字技术实施的干预措施、针对美国黑人及拉丁裔幼儿(2至12岁)的父母/照顾者、报告了父母/照顾者的参与结果、针对饮食或体育活动行为,以及随机对照试验研究设计。于2020年9月在教育资源信息中心(ERIC)、心理学文摘数据库(PsychInfo)、医学期刊数据库(PubMed)和科学引文索引数据库(Web of Science)中进行了检索。初步检索返回499条结果。四名评审员根据纳入标准对记录进行筛选,12项研究符合纳入标准。在所有研究中,父母/照顾者的参与度从低到高不等。只有一半的纳入研究报告称父母/照顾者和/或儿童的行为或体重状况结果有显著改善。在这些研究中,三项报告了较高的父母/照顾者参与率,三项报告了较高的满意度。这些发现表明,参与度和满意度可能会影响行为改变和体重状况。研究数量较少表明,需要进行更多研究以确定参与度或其他因素是否能预测对数字健康干预措施的反应。我们的结果为未来以父母/照顾者参与为明确目标的数字健康干预措施的开发和测试奠定了基础,并考虑到需要扩展我们的数字健康干预研究方法,以更好地解决不同家庭间的肥胖不平等问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92af/8522024/a82fc64e637d/fdgth-03-687648-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92af/8522024/a82fc64e637d/fdgth-03-687648-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92af/8522024/a82fc64e637d/fdgth-03-687648-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Black American and Latinx Parent/Caregiver Participation in Digital Health Obesity Interventions for Children: A Systematic Review.美国黑人与拉丁裔父母/照顾者参与儿童数字健康肥胖干预措施的系统评价
Front Digit Health. 2021 Jun 15;3:687648. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.687648. eCollection 2021.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Digital Interventions to Improve Health Literacy Among Parents of Children Aged 0 to 12 Years With a Health Condition: Systematic Review.数字干预措施提高健康素养的父母的孩子年龄 0 至 12 岁的健康状况:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 22;23(12):e31665. doi: 10.2196/31665.
4
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
The effectiveness of web-based programs on the reduction of childhood obesity in school-aged children: A systematic review.基于网络的项目对学龄儿童肥胖症减轻的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(42 Suppl):1-14. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-248.
7
8
9
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer.针对癌症患者非正式照护者的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 17;6(6):CD009912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009912.pub2.
10

引用本文的文献

1
mHealth Applications for Childhood Anxiety Disorders: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions.用于儿童焦虑症的移动健康应用程序:现状、挑战与未来方向。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2025 May 9. doi: 10.1007/s11920-025-01613-9.
2
User-centered design and development of a web-based tool to support healthy feeding practices by parents of urban minority youth at risk for childhood obesity.以用户为中心设计和开发一个基于网络的工具,以支持有儿童肥胖风险的城市少数族裔青少年的父母养成健康的喂养习惯。
Digit Health. 2024 Dec 5;10:20552076241298433. doi: 10.1177/20552076241298433. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Mobile Technologies for Supporting Mental Health in Youths: Scoping Review of Effectiveness, Limitations, and Inclusivity.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers and Enablers to Adoption of Digital Health Interventions to Support the Implementation of Dietary Guidelines in Early Childhood Education and Care: Cross-Sectional Study.采用数字健康干预措施支持幼儿教育和保育中饮食指南实施的障碍和促进因素:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 20;22(11):e22036. doi: 10.2196/22036.
2
Understanding Health Behavior Technology Engagement: Pathway to Measuring Digital Behavior Change Interventions.理解健康行为技术参与度:衡量数字行为改变干预措施的途径。
JMIR Form Res. 2019 Oct 10;3(4):e14052. doi: 10.2196/14052.
3
An iterative, interdisciplinary, collaborative framework for developing and evaluating digital behavior change interventions.
支持青少年心理健康的移动技术:有效性、局限性和包容性的范围综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2023 Aug 23;10:e46949. doi: 10.2196/46949.
4
Exploring Social Media Preferences for Healthy Weight Management Interventions Among Adolescents of Color: Mixed Methods Study.探索有色人种青少年对健康体重管理干预措施的社交媒体偏好:混合方法研究
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2023 May 8;6:e43961. doi: 10.2196/43961.
一种迭代的、跨学科的、协作的框架,用于开发和评估数字行为改变干预措施。
Transl Behav Med. 2020 Dec 31;10(6):1538-1548. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz109.
4
Creating an mHealth App for Colorectal Cancer Screening: User-Centered Design Approach.创建一款用于结直肠癌筛查的移动健康应用程序:以用户为中心的设计方法。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2019 May 8;6(2):e12700. doi: 10.2196/12700.
5
Emerging cancer trends among young adults in the USA: analysis of a population-based cancer registry.美国年轻人中癌症发病趋势的研究:基于人群的癌症登记数据分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Mar;4(3):e137-e147. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30267-6. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
6
The impact of a multilevel childhood obesity prevention intervention on healthful food acquisition, preparation, and fruit and vegetable consumption on African-American adult caregivers.多层次儿童肥胖预防干预对非裔美国成年照护者健康食品获取、准备和水果及蔬菜消费的影响。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 May;22(7):1300-1315. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018003038. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
7
Developing an implementation strategy for a digital health intervention: an example in routine healthcare.制定数字健康干预措施的实施策略:常规医疗保健中的一个实例
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 19;18(1):794. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3615-7.
8
Association of Obesity With Risk of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Among Women.肥胖与女性早发性结直肠癌风险的关联。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jan 1;5(1):37-44. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4280.
9
Trends in Obesity and Severe Obesity Prevalence in US Youth and Adults by Sex and Age, 2007-2008 to 2015-2016.美国青少年和成年人按性别和年龄划分的肥胖和重度肥胖流行趋势,2007-2008 年至 2015-2016 年。
JAMA. 2018 Apr 24;319(16):1723-1725. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3060.
10
Young Adult Cancer: Influence of the Obesity Pandemic.青年癌症:肥胖大流行的影响。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2018 Apr;26(4):641-650. doi: 10.1002/oby.22137.