Carbetocin versus oxytocin following vaginal and Cesarean delivery: a before-after study.

PURPOSE

A nationwide shortage of oxytocin in Canada resulted in a temporary switch from oxytocin to carbetocin for all postpartum women at our institution. This change offered a unique opportunity to conduct a pragmatic comparative assessment of the efficacy of carbetocin and oxytocin.

METHODS

In a retrospective before-after study, we reviewed the medical records from 641 women in the carbetocin group and 752 women in the oxytocin group . The standard carbetocin dosing was 100 µg iv following vaginal and intrapartum Cesarean delivery, while for elective Cesarean delivery it was 50 µg, with an additional 50 µg if required. The standard oxytocin dosing was 5 IU iv followed by 2.4 IU·hr for four to six hours after vaginal delivery, while for Cesarean delivery it was 1-3 IU iv, three minutes apart, up to 10 IU if required, followed by the same maintenance. In both modalities of delivery, if uterine tone was suboptimal, the maintenance dose of oxytocin could be increased to 4.8 IU·hr. In both groups, additional uterotonics were used as required. The primary outcome was the need for additional uterotonics. Secondary outcomes included estimated and calculated blood loss, the occurrence of postpartum hemorrhage, and the need for blood transfusion.

RESULTS

The incidence of additional uterotonic use was not different between the carbetocin and oxytocin groups (12.0% vs 8.8%; P = 0.05; odds ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.97 to 2.00). The incidence of postpartum hemorrhage was higher in the carbetocin group than in the oxytocin group (10.3% vs 6.6%; P = 0.01). Blood transfusion was more common in the carbetocin group (1.4% vs 0.3%; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in the use of additional uterotonics when carbetocin or oxytocin were used in a cohort of women undergoing vaginal deliveries and both elective and emergency Cesarean deliveries.