The Lidya and Carol Kittner, Lea and Benjamin Davidai Cardiovascular Division, Poriya Medical Center, Lower Galilee, Israel.
The Azrieli Faculty of Medicine in the Galilee, Bar-Ilan University, 8 Henrietta Szold street, Safed, Israel.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Mar;38(3):543-549. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02425-7. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
Assessment of diastolic function by echocardiography may be indeterminate as demonstrated in previous studies where diastolic measurement is a discrepant. We aimed to assess whether left atrial (LA) function may contribute to left ventricle filling evaluation in patients with indeterminate diastolic function (IndtDFx). This retrospective study included 3 groups of patients based on diastolic function: normal diastolic function (NDFx), definite diastolic dysfunction (DDFx) and IndtDFx. All patients had sinus rhythm with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 45%. Diastolic function was determined according to the following echocardiographic parameters: mitral E', mitral E/E' ratio, LA maximal volume index, and pulmonary pressure. NDFx was defined as having less than 2 abnormal parameters, DDFx as more than 2 abnormal parameters, and IndtDFx as 2 abnormal parameters. LA function analysis was performed in all patients using echocardiographic 2D speckle tracking. Sixty seven patients were included in strain analysis. The DDFx group (n = 21) and IndtDFx (n = 19) were significantly different from NDFx (27) in some demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, presentation and echocardiographic parameters. Some of the phasic LA function (phasic LA volumes and strains) parameters in the IndtDFx group were similar to DDFx and significantly different from the NDFx group, while other parameters fell in between the two groups. Phasic LA minimal volume index was found to be associated with heart failure symptoms. The IndtDFx group is a heterogeneous group demonstrating clinical and echocardiographic profiles that closely resemble that of DDFx group. LA phasic function analysis may help in re-classification of patients with IndtDFx as actual DDFx or as NDFx.
超声心动图评估舒张功能可能不确定,如先前研究所示,其中舒张测量存在差异。我们旨在评估左心房(LA)功能是否有助于评估舒张功能不确定(IndtDFx)患者的左心室充盈。这项回顾性研究根据舒张功能将患者分为 3 组:正常舒张功能(NDFx)、明确舒张功能障碍(DDFx)和 IndtDFx。所有患者均为窦性心律,左心室射血分数≥45%。舒张功能根据以下超声心动图参数确定:二尖瓣 E'、二尖瓣 E/E'比值、LA 最大容积指数和肺动脉压。NDFx 定义为少于 2 个异常参数,DDFx 为多于 2 个异常参数,IndtDFx 为 2 个异常参数。对所有患者使用超声心动图二维斑点追踪进行 LA 功能分析。有 67 例患者进行应变分析。DDFx 组(n=21)和 IndtDFx 组(n=19)在一些人口统计学、心血管危险因素、表现和超声心动图参数方面与 NDFx 组(27)明显不同。IndtDFx 组的一些相 LA 功能(相 LA 容积和应变)参数与 DDFx 相似,与 NDFx 差异显著,而其他参数则介于两者之间。相 LA 最小容积指数与心力衰竭症状相关。IndtDFx 组是一个异质性组,表现出与 DDFx 组非常相似的临床和超声心动图特征。LA 相功能分析可能有助于将 IndtDFx 患者重新分类为实际的 DDFx 或 NDFx。