• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨时区旅行与 1 型糖尿病:比较德谷胰岛素与甘精胰岛素 U100 的初步研究。

Traveling Across Time Zones With Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study Comparing Insulin Degludec With Insulin Glargine U100.

机构信息

1Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, CA.

2Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, CA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(1):67-73. doi: 10.2337/dc21-1524.

DOI:10.2337/dc21-1524
PMID:34716211
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

For people with type 1 diabetes, there are limited evidence-based resources to support self-management when traveling across multiple time zones. Here, we compared glycemic control on insulin degludec versus glargine U100 as the basal insulin for adults using multiple daily injections (MDI) while traveling across multiple time zones.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This randomized crossover pilot study compared insulin degludec versus glargine U100 for adults with type 1 diabetes using MDI insulin during long-haul travel to and from Hawaii to New York. Insulin degludec was administered daily at the same time regardless of time zone, and glargine was administered per travel algorithm. Primary end point was the percentage of time in range (TIR) between 70 and 140 mg/dL during the initial 24 h after each direction of travel. Secondary end points included standard continuous glucose monitoring metrics, jet lag, fatigue, and sleep.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 25 participants (56% women, mean ± SD age of 35 ± 14.5 years, HbA1c of 7.4 ± 1.2% [57 ± 13.1 mmol/mol], and diabetes duration of 20.6 ± 15 years). There was no significant difference in glycemic outcomes between the two arms of the study, including TIR, hypoglycemia, or hyperglycemia. Neither group achieved >70% TIR 70-180 mg/dL during travel. Jet lag was greater on glargine U100 in eastward travel but not westward. Fatigue was greater after westward travel on glargine. Sleep was not significantly different between basal insulins.

CONCLUSIONS

In adults with type 1 diabetes using MDI of insulin and traveling across multiple time zones, glycemic outcomes were similar comparing insulin degludec and glargine U100.

摘要

目的

对于 1 型糖尿病患者,在跨多个时区旅行时,支持自我管理的循证资源有限。在这里,我们比较了在跨多个时区旅行时使用多次注射(MDI)的基础胰岛素时,德谷胰岛素与 U100 甘精胰岛素对成年人的血糖控制情况。

研究设计和方法

这是一项随机交叉试点研究,比较了在往返夏威夷和纽约的长途旅行中使用 MDI 胰岛素的 1 型糖尿病成年人中德谷胰岛素与 U100 甘精胰岛素的疗效。无论时区如何,德谷胰岛素每天都在同一时间给药,而甘精胰岛素则根据旅行算法给药。主要终点是旅行前后 24 小时内,70-140mg/dL 范围内的时间百分比(TIR)。次要终点包括标准连续血糖监测指标、时差反应、疲劳和睡眠。

研究结果

该研究纳入了 25 名参与者(56%为女性,平均年龄为 35 ± 14.5 岁,HbA1c 为 7.4 ± 1.2%[57 ± 13.1mmol/mol],糖尿病病程为 20.6 ± 15 年)。在研究的两个臂之间,血糖控制结果没有显著差异,包括 TIR、低血糖和高血糖。两组在旅行期间均未达到>70%的 TIR 70-180mg/dL。向东旅行时,甘精 U100 的时差反应更大,但向西旅行时没有。甘精 U100 治疗后,向西旅行时疲劳感更大。两种基础胰岛素之间的睡眠没有显著差异。

结论

在使用 MDI 胰岛素并跨多个时区旅行的 1 型糖尿病成年人中,德谷胰岛素与 U100 甘精胰岛素的血糖控制结果相似。

相似文献

1
Traveling Across Time Zones With Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study Comparing Insulin Degludec With Insulin Glargine U100.跨时区旅行与 1 型糖尿病:比较德谷胰岛素与甘精胰岛素 U100 的初步研究。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(1):67-73. doi: 10.2337/dc21-1524.
2
Effect of insulin degludec versus insulin glargine U100 on time in range: SWITCH PRO, a crossover study of basal insulin-treated adults with type 2 diabetes and risk factors for hypoglycaemia.德谷胰岛素对比 U100 甘精胰岛素在达标时间方面的影响:SWITCH PRO,一项针对伴有低血糖风险因素的 2 型糖尿病及基础胰岛素治疗成人的交叉研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Nov;23(11):2572-2581. doi: 10.1111/dom.14504. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
3
Effect of Insulin Degludec vs Insulin Glargine U100 on Hypoglycemia in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The SWITCH 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.德谷胰岛素与甘精胰岛素U100对2型糖尿病患者低血糖影响的研究:SWITCH 2随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Jul 4;318(1):45-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7117.
4
Effect of Insulin Degludec vs Insulin Glargine U100 on Hypoglycemia in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: The SWITCH 1 Randomized Clinical Trial.德谷胰岛素与甘精胰岛素U100对1型糖尿病患者低血糖的影响:SWITCH 1随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Jul 4;318(1):33-44. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7115.
5
Weekly Icodec versus Daily Glargine U100 in Type 2 Diabetes without Previous Insulin.每周一次伊克多昔与每日一次甘精 U100 在无前期胰岛素的 2 型糖尿病中的应用比较。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Jul 27;389(4):297-308. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2303208. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
6
Cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec versus insulin glargine U100 in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in Bulgaria.在保加利亚,1 型和 2 型糖尿病成人患者中,德谷胰岛素相对于甘精胰岛素 U100 的成本效益分析。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2019 Dec 3;19(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12902-019-0460-6.
7
Insulin Glargine U100 Improved Glycemic Control and Reduced Nocturnal Hypoglycemia in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 3 and 4.精氨酸胰岛素 U100 改善 2 型糖尿病伴慢性肾脏病 3 期和 4 期患者的血糖控制并减少夜间低血糖。
Clin Ther. 2019 Oct;41(10):2008-2020.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.07.011. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
8
Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Recorded Hypoglycemia with Insulin Degludec or Insulin Glargine U100 in People with Type 1 Diabetes Prone to Nocturnal Severe Hypoglycemia.在夜间易发生严重低血糖的 1 型糖尿病患者中,德谷胰岛素或 U100 甘精胰岛素的连续血糖监测记录的低血糖
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 Sep;24(9):643-654. doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0567. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
9
Switching to Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec Versus Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100 in Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Daily Basal Insulin: A Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial.在每日基础胰岛素控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者中,转换使用每周一次的胰岛素伊克德与每日一次的甘精胰岛素 U100:一项 2 期随机对照试验。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jul;44(7):1586-1594. doi: 10.2337/dc20-2877. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
10
Hospitalization costs with degludec versus glargine U100 for patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk: Canadian costs applied to SAEs from a randomized outcomes trial.德谷胰岛素对比 U100 甘精胰岛素用于心血管高危 2 型糖尿病患者的住院费用:一项随机结局试验中 SAE 成本在加拿大的应用。
J Med Econ. 2021 Jan-Dec;24(1):1318-1326. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2021.2003804.

引用本文的文献

1
Travel health and people living with type 1 diabetes.旅行健康与1型糖尿病患者
Diabet Med. 2025 Jul;42(7):e70012. doi: 10.1111/dme.70012. Epub 2025 Feb 15.