• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鼻整形术后满意度的决定因素分析。

Analysis of Determinants of Postoperative Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty.

机构信息

Graduate Program in Surgery, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2022 Aug;132(8):1569-1575. doi: 10.1002/lary.29923. Epub 2021 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1002/lary.29923
PMID:34716715
Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To analyze different variables that influence postrhinoplasty quality of life outcomes to ascertain the determinants of postoperative satisfaction.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, observational study.

METHODS

This was a prospective, observational study where patients were divided into two groups based on the postoperative Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) score: high satisfaction group, when postoperative ROE scores were >50, and low satisfaction group, when postoperative ROE scores were ≤50. Patients' general characteristics, Portuguese version of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE-p) score, the Body Dysmorphic Disorder Examination, nasal angles, and measures from the esthetic facial analysis of postoperative photographs were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients were included: 19 in the low satisfaction group and 58 in the high satisfaction group. The median reduction in the NOSE-p score was -45 (interquartile range [IIQ] -20 to -60) (P < .001) in the high satisfaction group and -10 (IIQ -10 to -30) in the low satisfaction group (P = .053). The high satisfaction group had a significantly higher reduction in NOSE-p scores. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the analyzed facial parameters, although a significant difference was found when comparing them with the ones established in the literature as a pattern. Previous rhinoplasty, preoperative crooked nose, and higher NOSE-p scores were significantly associated with lower ROE scores (P < .05) in the robust Poisson regression model.

CONCLUSION

Functional results play an important role in satisfaction after rhinoplasty. Neoclassical canons were not fulfilled even in a group of patients with a high postoperative satisfaction evaluation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 132:1569-1575, 2022.

摘要

目的/假设:分析影响鼻整形术后生活质量结果的不同变量,以确定术后满意度的决定因素。

研究设计

前瞻性观察研究。

方法

这是一项前瞻性观察研究,根据术后鼻整形术结果评估(ROE)评分将患者分为两组:高满意度组,术后 ROE 评分>50;低满意度组,术后 ROE 评分≤50。比较两组患者的一般特征、葡萄牙语版鼻阻塞症状评估(NOSE-p)评分、躯体变形障碍检查表、鼻角和术后照片的美学面部分析测量值。

结果

共纳入 78 例患者:低满意度组 19 例,高满意度组 58 例。高满意度组的 NOSE-p 评分中位数降低-45(四分位距[IQR] -20 至-60)(P<0.001),低满意度组降低-10(IQR -10 至-30)(P=0.053)。高满意度组的 NOSE-p 评分降低更明显。两组分析的面部参数无显著差异,但与文献中作为模式的参数相比存在显著差异。在稳健泊松回归模型中,既往鼻整形术、术前歪鼻和较高的 NOSE-p 评分与 ROE 评分较低显著相关(P<0.05)。

结论

功能结果在鼻整形术后满意度中起着重要作用。即使在一组术后满意度评价较高的患者中,也未满足新古典主义美学标准。

证据水平

3 级喉镜,132:1569-1575,2022。

相似文献

1
Analysis of Determinants of Postoperative Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty.鼻整形术后满意度的决定因素分析。
Laryngoscope. 2022 Aug;132(8):1569-1575. doi: 10.1002/lary.29923. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
2
Functional and Esthetic Outcomes of L-Shaped Augmentation Rhinoplasty in Indonesian Noses.印尼人鼻型L形隆鼻术的功能与美学效果
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2023 May;132(5):492-496. doi: 10.1177/00034894221100026. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
3
Assessment of Patient Satisfaction With Evaluation Methods in Open Technique Septorhinoplasty.开放式鼻中隔成形术患者对评估方法的满意度评估
J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Mar;27(2):420-4. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002321.
4
Modified extracorporeal septoplasty: prospective study.改良体外鼻中隔成形术:前瞻性研究。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 May-Jun;90(3):101398. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2024.101398. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
5
Comparison of surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction after 2 different rhinoplasty techniques.两种不同隆鼻技术术后手术效果及患者满意度的比较。
J Craniofac Surg. 2014 Jul;25(4):1284-6. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000587.
6
Does a closed reduction improve aesthetical and functional outcome after nasal fracture?鼻骨骨折后进行闭合复位能否改善美学和功能效果?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 May;280(5):2299-2308. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07754-4. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
7
Aesthetic and Functional Results of Lateral Crural Repositioning.外侧脚重新定位的美学和功能效果。
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015 Jul-Aug;17(4):286-92. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2015.0590.
8
Evaluation of the effects of open and closed rhinoplasty on the psychosocial stress level and quality of life of rhinoplasty patients.评价开放式和封闭式隆鼻术对隆鼻患者社会心理压力水平及生活质量的影响。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Aug;72(8):1347-1354. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.03.020. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
9
The Effect of Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery, Body Appreciation, and Nasal Obstruction on Patient Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty.接受整容手术、对身体的欣赏和鼻塞对鼻整形术后患者满意度的影响。
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2023 May-Jun;25(3):206-211. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2022.0085. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
10
Awareness of Facial Asymmetry and Its Impact on Postoperative Satisfaction of Rhinoplasty Patient.对面部不对称的认知及其对鼻整形术后患者满意度的影响。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Feb;45(1):214-220. doi: 10.1007/s00266-020-01968-9. Epub 2020 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The Crooked Nose-Surgical Algorithm in Post-Traumatic Patient-Evaluation of Surgical Sequence.歪鼻——创伤后患者手术序列评估中的手术算法
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 27;14(1):87. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010087.
2
Postrhinoplasty Depression: A Systematic Review.隆鼻术后抑郁:一项系统评价
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Nov 25;12(11):e6321. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006321. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Bridging the Gap: Understanding Appalachian Patient Satisfaction in Cosmetic Rhinoplasty.弥合差距:了解阿巴拉契亚地区患者对鼻整形术的满意度。
Cureus. 2024 Jun 11;16(6):e62130. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62130. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Prospective Evaluation of Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes following Video-Assisted Rhino-Septoplasty.电视辅助鼻-鼻中隔成形术后美学与功能结果的前瞻性评估
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Dec;48(23):4855-4861. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04146-3. Epub 2024 May 31.
5
Harmonizing Beauty and Function: A Comprehensive Exploration of Patient Satisfaction in Rhinoplasty.协调美观与功能:隆鼻手术患者满意度的全面探索
World J Plast Surg. 2024;13(1):43-49. doi: 10.61186/wjps.13.1.43.
6
Comparison of Aesthetic and Functional Rhinoplasty Outcomes Between Patients with Body Dysmorphic Disorder and Normal Individuals.躯体变形障碍患者与正常个体的美容与功能鼻整形术效果比较。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Oct;48(20):4121-4129. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-03961-y. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
7
Prevalence of body dysmorphic disorder in rhinoplasty candidates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.隆鼻手术候选人中身体变形障碍的患病率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 17;6(8):e1495. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1495. eCollection 2023 Aug.