Prodel Eliza, Cavalcanti Thiago, Rocha Helena N M, Gondim Maitê L, Mira Pedro A C, Fisher James P, Nobrega Antonio C L
Laboratory of Exercise Science, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Fluminense Federal University, Niteroi, Brazil.
National Institute for Science & Technology - INCT, (In)activity & Exercise, Brazil.
Exp Physiol. 2021 Dec;106(12):2400-2411. doi: 10.1113/EP089954. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
What is the central question of this study? What is the role of β- and α-adrenergic receptors in the control of the coronary circulation during handgrip exercise and isolated muscle metaboreflex activation in humans? What is the main finding and its importance? β-Adrenergic receptor, but not α-adrenergic receptor, blockade significantly blunted the increases in coronary blood velocity observed during handgrip. Coronary blood velocity was unchanged from baseline during isolated muscle metaboreflex activation. This highlights the important role of β-adrenergic receptors in the coronary circulation during handgrip in humans, and the more limited involvement of the α-adrenergic receptors.
We sought to investigate the role of β- and α-adrenergic receptors in coronary circulation during static handgrip exercise and isolated muscle metaboreflex activation in humans. Seventeen healthy young men underwent two experimental sessions, consisting of 3 min of static handgrip exercise at a target force of 40% maximum voluntary force (not achieved for the full 3 min), and 3 min of metaboreflex activation (post-exercise ischaemia) in two conditions: (1) control and β-blockade (oral propranolol), and (2) control and α-blockade (oral prazosin). In both sessions, coronary blood velocity (CBV, echocardiography) was increased during handgrip (Δ8.0 ± 7.4 cm s ) but unchanged with metaboreflex activation (Δ2.5 ± 3.2 cm s ) under control conditions. β-Blockade abolished the increase in CBV during handgrip, while CBV was unchanged from control with α-blockade. Cardiac work, estimated from rate pressure product (RPP; systolic blood pressure multiplied by heart rate), increased during handgrip and metaboreflex in control conditions in both sessions. β-Blockade reduced RPP responses to handgrip and metaboreflex, whereas α-blockade increased RPP, but the responses to handgrip and metaboreflex were unchanged. CBV and RPP were only significantly correlated during handgrip under control (r = 0.71, P < 0.01) and β-blockade (r = 0.54, P = 0.03) conditions, and the slope of this relationship was unaltered with β-blockade. Collectively, these findings indicate that β-adrenergic receptors play the primary role to the increase of coronary circulation during handgrip exercise, but CBV is unchanged with metaboreflex activation, while α-adrenergic receptor stimulation seems to exert no effect in the control of the coronary circulation during handgrip exercise and isolated muscle metaboreflex activation in humans.
本研究的核心问题是什么?在人类进行握力运动和孤立肌肉代谢性反射激活过程中,β-肾上腺素能受体和α-肾上腺素能受体在冠状动脉循环控制中起什么作用?主要发现及其重要性是什么?β-肾上腺素能受体阻滞剂而非α-肾上腺素能受体阻滞剂,能显著减弱握力运动时观察到的冠状动脉血流速度增加。在孤立肌肉代谢性反射激活过程中,冠状动脉血流速度与基线相比无变化。这突出了β-肾上腺素能受体在人类握力运动时冠状动脉循环中的重要作用,以及α-肾上腺素能受体参与程度较有限。
我们试图研究β-和α-肾上腺素能受体在人类静态握力运动和孤立肌肉代谢性反射激活过程中对冠状动脉循环的作用。17名健康青年男性接受了两个实验环节,包括在目标力为最大自主力40%(在整个3分钟内未达到)的情况下进行3分钟静态握力运动,以及在两种情况下进行3分钟代谢性反射激活(运动后缺血):(1)对照和β-阻滞剂(口服普萘洛尔),以及(2)对照和α-阻滞剂(口服哌唑嗪)。在两个环节中,在对照条件下,握力运动期间冠状动脉血流速度(CBV,超声心动图测量)增加(Δ8.0±7.4厘米/秒),但代谢性反射激活时无变化(Δ2.5±3.2厘米/秒)。β-阻滞剂消除了握力运动时CBV的增加,而α-阻滞剂使CBV与对照时相比无变化。根据心率血压乘积(RPP;收缩压乘以心率)估算的心脏作功,在两个环节的对照条件下,握力运动和代谢性反射激活时均增加。β-阻滞剂降低了对握力运动和代谢性反射的RPP反应,而α-阻滞剂增加了RPP,但对握力运动和代谢性反射的反应无变化。仅在对照(r = 0.71,P < 0.01)和β-阻滞剂(r = 0.54,P = 0.03)条件下,握力运动期间CBV和RPP显著相关,且这种关系的斜率在β-阻滞剂作用下未改变。总体而言,这些发现表明β-肾上腺素能受体在握力运动期间冠状动脉循环增加中起主要作用,但代谢性反射激活时CBV无变化,而α-肾上腺素能受体刺激在人类握力运动和孤立肌肉代谢性反射激活过程中对冠状动脉循环控制似乎无作用。