• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Laparoendoscopic single-site compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological acute abdomen in pregnant women.腹腔镜单孔与传统腹腔镜手术治疗孕妇妇科急腹症的比较。
J Int Med Res. 2021 Oct;49(10):3000605211053985. doi: 10.1177/03000605211053985.
2
Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.妇科机器人腹腔镜单孔手术:可行性、安全性和技术的前瞻性分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;212(2):179.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.057. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
3
Safety and feasibility of a single-port laparoscopic adnexal surgery during pregnancy.妊娠期经单孔腹腔镜附件手术的安全性和可行性。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Nov-Dec;20(6):864-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.06.002. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
4
Pregnancy-preserving Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery for Gynecologic Disease: A Case Series.保留妊娠的腹腔镜单孔手术治疗妇科疾病:病例系列。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Nov-Dec;27(7):1588-1597. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
5
Gasless laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for management of adnexal masses during pregnancy.无气腹腹腔镜单孔手术治疗妊娠期附件肿物
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Sep;180:28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.06.019. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
6
Laparoendoscopic Single-site Compared With Conventional Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy for Ovarian Endometrioma.腹腔镜单孔与传统腹腔镜卵巢囊肿切除术治疗卵巢子宫内膜异位症的比较
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Jul-Aug;22(5):813-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.03.012. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
7
Management of pediatric and adolescent adnexal masses by gasless laparoendoscopic single-site surgery.无气腹腔镜单孔手术治疗小儿及青少年附件肿物
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Oct;181:66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.07.021. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
8
Comparison of single-port and three-port laparoscopic salpingectomy in the management for tubal pregnancy.比较单孔腹腔镜与三孔腹腔镜输卵管切除术治疗输卵管妊娠的效果。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2018 May;81(5):469-474. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
9
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments and glove port technique in gynecology: a single surgeon's experience.在妇科中使用传统腹腔镜器械和手套端口技术的腹腔镜单孔手术:一位外科医生的经验。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Jan;22(1):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Jul 19.
10
Single-port laparoscopic salpingectomy for surgical treatment of tubal pregnancy: comparison with multi-port laparoscopic salpingectomy.单孔腹腔镜输卵管切除术治疗输卵管妊娠:与多孔腹腔镜输卵管切除术的比较。
Int J Med Sci. 2013 Jun 24;10(8):1073-8. doi: 10.7150/ijms.5994. Print 2013.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery for adnexal mass in pregnant women.评价腹腔镜单孔手术治疗孕妇附件包块。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Oct 4;24(1):647. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06829-w.
2
Single-port laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy of benign adnexal masses during pregnancy: a retrospective case-control study.单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜治疗妊娠期良性附件肿块的回顾性病例对照研究。
J Int Med Res. 2022 Oct;50(10):3000605221128153. doi: 10.1177/03000605221128153.
3
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for adnexal disease during pregnancy: A single-center preliminary experience.妊娠期附件疾病的经脐单孔腹腔镜手术:单中心初步经验
Front Surg. 2022 Oct 14;9:994360. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.994360. eCollection 2022.
4
Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Adnexal Mass Removal During Pregnancy: The Initial Experience of a Single Institute.单孔腹腔镜手术治疗孕期附件肿物:单中心的初步经验
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 15;8:800180. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.800180. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic Single-site "In-bag" Ovarian Dermoid Cystectomy in a 16-week- pregnant Patient.腹腔镜下单部位“内袋法”卵巢皮样囊肿切除术在 16 周妊娠患者中的应用。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Sep;28(9):1569-1570. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.04.016. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
2
Correction: Evidence-Based Guideline on Laparoscopy in Pregnancy: Commissioned by the British Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (BSGE) Endorsed by the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists (RCOG).更正:《妊娠期腹腔镜检查循证指南》:由英国妇科内镜学会(BSGE)委托编写,经皇家妇产科医师学院(RCOG)认可。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2020 Jan 24;11(3):261.
3
Pregnancy-preserving Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery for Gynecologic Disease: A Case Series.保留妊娠的腹腔镜单孔手术治疗妇科疾病:病例系列。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Nov-Dec;27(7):1588-1597. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
4
Non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy - an eleven-year retrospective analysis.妊娠期非产科手术——一项十一年的回顾性分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Oct 25;19(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2554-6.
5
Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery for Management of Heterotopic Pregnancy: A Case Report and Review of Literature.腹腔镜单孔手术治疗异位妊娠:一例报告及文献复习
Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul 4;2018:7232637. doi: 10.1155/2018/7232637. eCollection 2018.
6
Postoperative Pain After Single-Site Versus Multiport Hysterectomy.单孔与多孔子宫切除术后的疼痛
JSLS. 2017 Oct-Dec;21(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2017.00065.
7
Screening for anxiety and depression: reassessing the utility of the Zung scales.焦虑和抑郁筛查:重新评估zung量表的效用
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Sep 8;17(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1489-6.
8
SAGES guidelines for the use of laparoscopy during pregnancy.SAGES关于孕期腹腔镜检查使用的指南。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):3767-3782. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5637-3. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
9
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜单孔手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗子宫切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 May;295(5):1089-1103. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4323-y. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
10
Progesterone in normal and pathological pregnancy.正常与病理性妊娠中的孕酮
Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig. 2016 Jul 1;27(1):35-48. doi: 10.1515/hmbci-2016-0038.

腹腔镜单孔与传统腹腔镜手术治疗孕妇妇科急腹症的比较。

Laparoendoscopic single-site compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological acute abdomen in pregnant women.

机构信息

Graduate School, 36674Dalian Medical University, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.

Department of Gynaecology, Shenyang Women's and Children's Hospital, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 2021 Oct;49(10):3000605211053985. doi: 10.1177/03000605211053985.

DOI:10.1177/03000605211053985
PMID:34719992
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8562634/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the safety and feasibility of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in pregnant patients with acute abdomen.

METHODS

Baseline characteristics, surgical results, and obstetric and neonatal outcomes were retrospectively compared between single and multiport procedures in patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy between 2017 and 2021.

RESULTS

Fifty-four pregnant patients were included: 26 who underwent LESS (salpingectomy, 11 cases/cystectomy, 15 cases) and 28 who underwent conventional laparoscopic surgeries (salpingectomy, 12 cases/cystectomy, 16 cases) during pregnancy. One patient in the single-port group required additional ports. No patients converted to laparotomy. In patients undergoing salpingectomy, the single-port group showed lower 8- and 24-h postoperative pain scores, shorter hospital stays, and lower Self-rating Anxiety Scale scores prior to discharge versus conventional laparoscopy. One patient experienced postoperative vaginal bleeding and a missed abortion during follow-up. In patients receiving cystectomy, 8- and 24-h pain scores, postoperative hospital stay, and anxiety scores were lower in the single-port versus multiport group. Other outcomes were comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy is similar between single- or multiport routes, however, the single-port route may be associated with less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay, and lower anxiety.

摘要

目的

评估腹腔镜单部位手术(LESS)在妊娠急腹症患者中的安全性和可行性。

方法

回顾性比较 2017 年至 2021 年期间行腹腔镜手术的妊娠患者中单部位和多部位手术的基线特征、手术结果以及产科和新生儿结局。

结果

共纳入 54 例妊娠患者:26 例行 LESS(输卵管切除术 11 例/囊肿切除术 15 例),28 例行传统腹腔镜手术(输卵管切除术 12 例/囊肿切除术 16 例)。单端口组有 1 例患者需要额外的端口。无一例患者转为开腹手术。在输卵管切除术患者中,单端口组术后 8 小时和 24 小时的疼痛评分较低,住院时间较短,出院前的自评焦虑量表评分较低,与传统腹腔镜相比。1 例患者在随访中出现术后阴道出血和稽留流产。在接受囊肿切除术的患者中,单端口组术后 8 小时和 24 小时的疼痛评分、术后住院时间和焦虑评分均低于多端口组。其他结果两组间无差异。

结论

在妊娠期间,腹腔镜手术的可行性和疗效在单部位或多部位途径之间相似,但单部位途径可能与术后疼痛减轻、住院时间缩短和焦虑降低有关。