Goldstein A M, Haile R W, Marazita M L, Paganini-Hill A
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1987 May;78(5):911-8.
A complex segregation analysis was conducted of breast cancer in 200 families with bilateral breast cancer. Results for two analyses are presented. The first analysis considered only premenopausal cases of breast cancer as affected. The results indicate that mendelian transmission of a single locus is not sufficient to explain the distribution of premenopausal breast cancer seen. A mixed model, i.e., a major locus plus other transmission (genetic and/or cultural), is necessary to explain the distribution. The second analysis added postmenopausal cases of breast cancer to the premenopausal ones, thus considering all breast cancer cases to be affected with the same disorder. The all-cases analysis is unable to reject a mixed model with no generation differences in heritability when tested against the general model, which allows for generation differences (i.e., the likelihoods for the two models were not significantly different). Approaches to studying etiologic heterogeneity in segregation analysis and results of other segregation analyses of breast cancer are presented.
对200个双侧乳腺癌家庭的乳腺癌进行了复杂分离分析。给出了两种分析结果。第一种分析仅将绝经前乳腺癌病例视为患病。结果表明,单一位点的孟德尔遗传不足以解释所观察到的绝经前乳腺癌的分布。需要一个混合模型,即一个主要位点加上其他传递方式(遗传和/或文化)来解释这种分布。第二种分析将绝经后乳腺癌病例添加到绝经前病例中,从而认为所有乳腺癌病例都患有同一种疾病。在与允许世代差异的一般模型进行检验时,全病例分析无法拒绝一个在遗传力上没有世代差异的混合模型(即两个模型的似然性没有显著差异)。介绍了在分离分析中研究病因异质性的方法以及其他乳腺癌分离分析的结果。